Does anybody else besides me find those bodyside/window layouts and sizes a little odd. It's as if they've tried to copy the Desiro windows then ran out of space. That said, I'm still not made up on the design of the unit - The Chin and narrow cab windscreens still make it look odd.
I think the front face is smart looking, but having seen it from the side I'm having second thoughts about the unit in it's entirety. Makes me wonder why Transport Scotland didn't go for British built Electrostars that are coming into fashion down south just now. Worried at the gap between windows would result in poor window|seat alignment which is becoming the norm over the national rail network, and not to mention the god damned ironing boards invading most trains left right and centre.
A British built class 387 with similar seats to class 379 would've been less hassle I'd of thought than importing new trains from Japan. As long as the seats are aligned with the windows then they'll remain on my good books; although I never understand why TOCs don't maximise comfort where possible. For example they could of used class 395 seats in standard class and have the first class seats the same as that on the 800s - pointless in my opinion how they've laid out the interior.
Never the less I'm still a fan of the 385s, I just hope they live up to what Scotrail said they would do and hopefully prove us wrong.
Last thing I want come electrification is mediocre stock coming up my way.