By '47' I also include its spiritual descendent, the 67.
Jealousy??? Come 'ere and say that!
Eh, but you like the 67s?
Anyway, descendant? 67s are nothing like a 47. Just because 67s replaced 47s off of the mail traffic. By that anylysis, 47s must be the spiritual descendants of all these locos you loved. Obviously you wont like that, but it makes as much sense as what you said.
67s are are poorly built and poorly designed locos that struggle to find work, and are restricted with what they can do.
47s are a versatile sturdy workhorse, that even now still have just as many locos in traffic as the 67s have. In their day they were 500 strong, and were at home on virtually any type of train.
The 67s are quite clearly a poor mans loco. Designed with one thing in mind, and struggles to do even that.
The 47 and 67 are miles apart, even if the 67s were built to replace the last of the 47s.
Anyway, as you seem to include 67 when you mention 47, from now on, when I say a class, you will have absolutely no idea what loco im on about. I may say 47, but i may mean 26. Or I may mean 46.
Anyway, dont be ashamed of your jealousy. At least deep down you know 47s are the best, even if you cant come out and say it.