I don't really see how TOC level pay talks work, given the TOCs aren't really businesses any more and are all being controlled from the centre by proxy.
The TOCs aren’t really businesses any more? Are you sure about that? It’ll certainly be news to the shareholders of the owning groups, someone had better write to them!
It’s a nonsensical statement.
It makes some sense to separate pay and conditions, as long as the latter can still be imposed, which was how Southern DOO strikes finally got resolved. DOO has existed for 40yrs now, it makes no sense to allow another 18 months of DOO strikes on SWR when DOO has existed for decades across the footbridge at Waterloo East.
Actually the Southern dispute was resolved primarily because DOO had already been agreed with ASLEF many years prior, and was in the drivers’ contracts. I detect that you just like the idea of conditions being unilaterally imposed.
You’ll find there are also still many trains running through Waterloo East which carry guards.
Some TOCs have Sunday working and DOO already so it doesn't make sense to have a national dispute around those issues. But the guiding mind of GBR shouldn't lose sight of the fact the railway needs reliable and robust Sunday services, and has for many years, but currently has neither.
And, as above, many TOCs have robust Sunday working and have done for years.
Overall another post which shows how little you really understand about the railway’s ownership structure and the operational aspects you weigh in to discuss.