• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

RMT Talks

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Joined
8 Jul 2014
Messages
393
These things of course are subjective. Myself personally would quite happily give up my priv if they offered me a larger pay increase. In the 6 years I’ve been on the railway I’ve used my priv twice and saved a whole £20. It’s a benefit I just don’t use and I’d rather have extra pay per month in lieu of it.
 

GPR

Member
Joined
16 Oct 2011
Messages
228
Location
Liverpool
These things of course are subjective. Myself personally would quite happily give up my priv if they offered me a larger pay increase. In the 6 years I’ve been on the railway I’ve used my priv twice and saved a whole £20. It’s a benefit I just don’t use and I’d rather have extra pay per month in lieu of it.
+1.
It would work well for people soon to retire but not anybody else.
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
19,800
Location
East Anglia
Yes
Wow, I am out of touch. I thought this was already the case. My grand mother had priv travel because of my grand father.
Yes I am one of the lucky ones who as long as I keep my nose clean and leave under the two R's then it's free and priv travel for the rest of my life.
 

Kipperthecat

Member
Joined
22 Aug 2020
Messages
52
Location
Manchester
RMT members accepted a deal that required the second year to be negotiated with the TOCS for the 4% as I recall. None of the RMT members down my way have had the 4% for 23/24 only the 5% for 22/23. So RMT will definitely be looking for a 24/25 settlement but suspect it has proven tricky to go back on a previous agreement and seek a better deal. Might be what is holding an RMT offer up.
I dont think that is quite what is being said , what is being said at NR is that they are awaiting a new mandate from the government to make a better pay offer than the one that was previously rejected . And that this is similar to the situation at the TOC's .

So TOC staff have had a 0.75% increase on top of the 4% they had previously accepted for 23/24 ?

NR staff have already received the 23/24 increase, so presumably they will be offered 4.5% for 24/25 ?

In addition, the workforce changes are postponed (unlike the modernising maintenance at NR).

Are the RMT trying to revisit the previously agreed deal for NR staff to align with the TOC / ASLEF deals ?
 

scrapy

Established Member
Joined
15 Dec 2008
Messages
2,301
So TOC staff have had a 0.75% increase on top of the 4% they had previously accepted for 23/24 ?

NR staff have already received the 23/24 increase, so presumably they will be offered 4.5% for 24/25 ?

In addition, the workforce changes are postponed (unlike the modernising maintenance at NR).

Are the RMT trying to revisit the previously agreed deal for NR staff to align with the TOC / ASLEF deals ?
No the deal was only ever 5% or £1750 (whatevers greater) for 22/23.

The 4% was part of a previous strings attached offer that was rejected. 23/24 is still to be settled (although looks likely to be with this offer).
 

kw12

Member
Joined
12 Jan 2017
Messages
233
No the deal was only ever 5% or £1750 (whatevers greater) for 22/23.

The 4% was part of a previous strings attached offer that was rejected. 23/24 is still to be settled (although looks likely to be with this offer).
The deal that was accepted last year was a two year deal, 5% for 22/23 and 4% for 23/24.

See, for example:


The deal comes after Network Rail amended its previously rejected offer of a 5% pay rise for 2022 and a 4% increase this year.

The government did not put any more money on the table, but the tweaked proposals backdated this year's pay increase by three months, meaning workers end up with a bigger lump sum upfront.

The RMT - the country's biggest rail union - said the offer amounted to an uplift on salaries of between 14.4% for the lowest paid grades to 9.2% for the highest paid.
 

muz379

Established Member
Joined
23 Jan 2014
Messages
2,500
Are the RMT trying to revisit the previously agreed deal for NR staff to align with the TOC / ASLEF deals ?
I doubt the unuion would get anywhere trying to reopen negotiations on a deal that was previously agreed . At least from what I can gather from the communications from the union there has been no intention to attempt to revisit previously agreed pay deals .

So will the pay rise happen for both 23/24 & 24/25 for NR staff ?
There was already a rise for 23/24 and it was 4%

So currently the pay claim is for 24/25 . Dont forget the NWR pay anniversary was shifted to Janurary .
 
Joined
8 Jul 2014
Messages
393
+1.
It would work well for people soon to retire but not anybody else.
If it changed so I’d keep facilities after retirement then maybe it would be different, but as it stands it’s a colossal waste for me…
 

janb

Member
Joined
16 Jul 2008
Messages
833
The deal that was accepted last year was a two year deal, 5% for 22/23 and 4% for 23/24.

See, for example:

No, the link you offer refers to Network Rail staff. Scrapy was talking about the deal for TOC staff which was only for 22/23 (5% or £1750) and an agreement to talk about 23/24 and reforms on a TOC by TOC basis.
 

KM1991

Member
Joined
3 Sep 2013
Messages
229
Interesting that there doesn’t seem to be any underpin this time around….?
Yep, no minimum uplift is a horrible deal.

Some workers on 20k getting a 4.75% rise when inflation was over 10% last April. Was this really the best deal the negotiating team could get?
 

CaptainHaddock

Established Member
Joined
10 Feb 2011
Messages
2,711
Wow, I am out of touch. I thought this was already the case. My grand mother had priv travel because of my grand father.
All depends on when you joined the railway, I believe. Safeguarded staff who joined before privatisation keep their priv when they retire, those of us who only got priv travel last year as part of the last Network Rail pay deal lose all their facilities on leaving the company. That's why many of us value keeping priv travel on retirement far higher than an extra per cent on the next pay deal.
 

GardenRail

Member
Joined
26 Mar 2023
Messages
504
All depends on when you joined the railway, I believe. Safeguarded staff who joined before privatisation keep their priv when they retire, those of us who only got priv travel last year as part of the last Network Rail pay deal lose all their facilities on leaving the company. That's why many of us value keeping priv travel on retirement far higher than an extra per cent on the next pay deal.
I've got 20 more years to do, I want a pensionable pay increase every year, not reduced rate travel. Imagine foregoing pay rises, then die a week into retirement.
 

scrapy

Established Member
Joined
15 Dec 2008
Messages
2,301
Yep, no minimum uplift is a horrible deal.

Some workers on 20k getting a 4.75% rise when inflation was over 10% last April. Was this really the best deal the negotiating team could get?
Are any TOC workers on 20k for a full time contract?
 

Geeves

Established Member
Joined
6 Jan 2009
Messages
2,616
Location
Rochdale
So the email yesterday to all the grades specifically said the offer was for all grades except drivers how ever according to the TSSA that was incorrect and the deal for the RMT was purely for drivers in the union hence why it's the same deal as ASLEF. #shrugs

There hasn't been any communication from the RMT to its members today.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_2024-08-31-22-12-34-22_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12.jpg
    Screenshot_2024-08-31-22-12-34-22_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12.jpg
    481.5 KB · Views: 118

winks

Member
Joined
11 Jun 2009
Messages
623
U can’t keep doing a minimum underpin - unfortunately it leads to compression in the pay bands and that in itself causes problems.

As rail staff are classed as public sector workers now it won’t get much better in future years in terms of percentage increases.
 

DMckduck

Member
Joined
26 Jul 2020
Messages
488
So the email yesterday to all the grades specifically said the offer was for all grades except drivers how ever according to the TSSA that was incorrect and the deal for the RMT was purely for drivers in the union hence why it's the same deal as ASLEF. #shrugs

There hasn't been any communication from the RMT to its members today.
TOC drivers negotiations are done by ASLEF whether they represent them or not.
 
Joined
8 Jul 2014
Messages
393
You certainly CAN do an underpin to bring the raises up to date as it’s been dragging a year or two out of sync and inflation was much higher then. After we are all up to date, remove the underpin by all means as then inflation figures are relevant to the actual year you’re negotiating for….
 

Towers

Established Member
Joined
30 Aug 2021
Messages
2,964
Location
UK
So the email yesterday to all the grades specifically said the offer was for all grades except drivers how ever according to the TSSA that was incorrect and the deal for the RMT was purely for drivers in the union hence why it's the same deal as ASLEF. #shrugs

There hasn't been any communication from the RMT to its members today.
That makes very little sense; whilst some drivers are indeed RMT members their pay is negotiated by Aslef as they represent the overwhelming majority, and staff are not paid differently according to their union membership - drivers with RMT membership receive whatever paydeal Aslef negotiates for the driving grade at their particular TOC. The wording of the RMT communication shared earlier in the thread was very clear that it was all grades, so unless there has been an almighty communication issue between the RMT and DfT negotiation teams it would seem that TSSA have got their wires crossed somewhere.

Over to the RMT!
 
Joined
8 Jul 2014
Messages
393
Beginning of last email sent - this was the header:

TO ALL RMT MEMBERS (EXCLUDING DRIVERS) AT TRAIN OPERATING COMPANIES

I think that clears it up.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top