I couldn’t agree more.
I think how much more beautiful Cannon St might have been had the glass barrel-vaulted roof survived the War too.
Indeed !
I couldn’t agree more.
I think how much more beautiful Cannon St might have been had the glass barrel-vaulted roof survived the War too.
Did you by any chance have the opportunity to talk to anybody with a mobility impairment, heavy luggage, a buggy with small children, etc. who had just struggled up from the Westbound Hammersmith & City line platform or from the Central Line whether they also regarded retention of the pastiche roof as a vital priority?I ended up travelling through Liverpool Street this xmas due to the Cross being closed and I made sure to have a good look around on the Concourse.
It struck me once again just what a good job BR did in the 1980's. The roof is what a station roof should be and the new section enhances the beauty of the Victorian train shed beyond what it was within the constriction of the original buildings.
It will be a travesty if it is destroyed.
Did you by any chance have the opportunity to talk to anybody with a mobility impairment, heavy luggage, a buggy with small children, etc. who had just struggled up from the Westbound Hammersmith & City line platform or from the Central Line whether they also regarded retention of the pastiche roof as a vital priority?
Did you by any chance have the opportunity to talk to anybody with a mobility impairment, heavy luggage, a buggy with small children, etc. who had just struggled up from the Westbound Hammersmith & City line platform or from the Central Line whether they also regarded retention of the pastiche roof as a vital priority?
The original coverage, e.g. a New Civil Engineer article in October 2022, stated that there would be step free access to all London Underground lines.Liverpool street Tube station would be much improved by step free access to all lines and platforms; However, wouldn't that be a TfL project (as TfL own the tube station) and it certainly wouldn't require as massive a project as proposed here
I must have missed that, my apologies; the step free access to the central line and westbound subsurface lines would be the only part of the project I would accept as a benefit (and a major one at that); I'd still maintain that it doesn't require building a massive structure on-topThe original coverage, e.g. a New Civil Engineer article in October 2022, stated that there would be step free access to all London Underground lines.
I think that the issue is one of where TfL would fund such a project from, on their own. Even if they could find the cash there would presumably be an opportunity cost insofar as it might have been spent at another lift-less station - places like Baker Street or Oxford Circus spring immediately to mind.I must have missed that, my apologies; the step free access to the central line and westbound subsurface lines would be the only part of the project I would accept as a benefit (and a major one at that); I'd still maintain that it doesn't require building a massive structure on-top
“It’s time the station becomes a destination in its own right, to handle the demands of the future.”
The Sidings got completed at a bad time for commercial property. Once they redevelop the grim blocks next to it then it should get an upsurge in demand as it becomes a route into the station from the Wheel direction (unless they get round to building the southern entrance under the platforms)Is that really the case? Hasn’t Waterloo, (The Sidings), shown that to be a flawed position?
Don’t most people just want a seamless onward journey to their real destination, with minimal delays as they pass through the terminus to/from other modes such as Underground or Crossrail in this case?
On the surface this does look like a better plan than the previous one which was roundly condemned.Network rails plan for the redevelopment of Liverpool Street http://www.timeforliverpoolstreet.co.uk/
Press Release
![]()
It's time for Liverpool Street Station
Network Rail Property launches consultation on new plans to transform Britain’s busiest station.gloo.to
Possibly for the ‘classic commuter’. But station retail and refreshment facilities are really useful to many travellers.Don’t most people just want a seamless onward journey to their real destination, with minimal delays as they pass through the terminus to/from other modes such as Underground or Crossrail in this case?
Hasn’t St Pancras proved the opposite?Is that really the case? Hasn’t Waterloo, (The Sidings), shown that to be a flawed position?
Don’t most people just want a seamless onward journey to their real destination, with minimal delays as they pass through the terminus to/from other modes such as Underground or Crossrail in this case?
Taking the latest plans at face value, they do seem a big improvement on the original plans.
Agree - this looks better though I'm still interested to see what's planned for the plaza area by the McDonalds.
It will have a lot more passing traffic now it has a Spoons!The Sidings isn’t in a good location for the current passenger flows. Little passing traffic and it’s a pain to get to (relatively speaking). Both St P and Liverpool Street have much better sited retail.
The footfall in the Sidings increased dramatically while the main station toilets were closed! All back to normal though now.The Sidings isn’t in a good location for the current passenger flows. Little passing traffic and it’s a pain to get to (relatively speaking). Both St P and Liverpool Street have much better sited retail.
The footfall in the Sidings increased dramatically while the main station toilets were closed! All back to normal though now.
The Sidings isn’t in a good location for the current passenger flows. Little passing traffic and it’s a pain to get to (relatively speaking). Both St P and Liverpool Street have much better sited retail.
![]()
Major UK railway station's £1.5bn expansion plans scaled back following backlash
An 'ugly and uninspired' proposal to revamp one of the UK's most historic train stations has been scaled back and redrawn - following thousands of objections.www.mirror.co.uk
Major UK railway station's £1.5bn expansion scaled back after 'disproportionate' plans slammed
An 'ugly and uninspired' proposal to revamp one of the UK's most historic train stations has been scaled back and redrawn - following thousands of objections.
Ambitious plans to redevelop one of the UK's most popular train station have been sent back to the drawing board.
Network Rail had been previously working Sellar - a property giant known for developing The Shard - on a £1.5 billion scheme to significantly revamp London's Liverpool Street station (not to be confused with Liverpool Lime Street). Proposals submitted last year included a part demolition of the Victorian station, a controversial multi-storey tower cantilevered above the Grade II listed Andaz Hotel, to be used as offices.
I have heard of it happening at Norwich, one of the few stations with direct services to bothThe following news story is in The Mirror today. I do not know if London Liverpool Street Station is ever confused with Liverpool Lime Street Station.
That would rend to reinforce the unkind things said about Norfolkians in general.I have heard of it happening at Norwich, one of the few stations with direct services to both
I mean, only stations with services to both Liverpool Lime street and London Liverpool street are locations where this confusion could occur. Unless I've missed some, that is really just Norwich and Ely.That would rend to reinforce the unkind things said about Norfolkians in general.