• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Railway Myths

Status
Not open for further replies.

deltic1989

Established Member
Joined
21 Sep 2010
Messages
1,483
Location
Nottingham
Myth no oh I don't know abot 250 by now? Pacers are perfectly fit for purpose and are in no way out dated or pointless.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

sprinterguy

Veteran Member
Joined
4 Mar 2010
Messages
11,571
Location
Macclesfield
Myth no oh I don't know abot 250 by now? Pacers are perfectly fit for purpose and are in no way out dated or pointless.

They're in no way pointless: They're operating services that woud otherwise be unable to run as there would be insufficient trains avaialable: Quite a high proportion of the services on the Northern network in fact.
 

142094

Established Member
Joined
7 Nov 2009
Messages
8,789
Location
Newcastle
Myth no oh I don't know abot 250 by now? Pacers are perfectly fit for purpose and are in no way out dated or pointless.

Again what would you have done at the time? I'm sure a lot of people on here that moan about Pacers either:

1) Think BR had pots of gold

2) Have never ridden on one in their life

3) Think new rolling stock can appear at the click of a finger.

Pacers do their job well, and there are other things that are older and still working on the railway.
 

Flamingo

Established Member
Joined
26 Apr 2010
Messages
6,806
Again what would you have done at the time? I'm sure a lot of people on here that moan about Pacers either:

1) Think BR had pots of gold

2) Have never ridden on one in their life

3) Think new rolling stock can appear at the click of a finger.

Pacers do their job well, and there are other things that are older and still working on the railway.
Semaphore signalling for one!
 

chuckles1066

Member
Joined
24 Nov 2010
Messages
361
Myth xxxx - the rapid beeping does not mean the doors are about to close, it's a signal for you to lean out of the carriage and peer menacingly up and down the (now empty) platform.

(Must be a January thing, last night and tonight I witnessed the same thing, two different individuals).

Here's a thought; have a guillotine-type razor edge to the doors and make them close very, very, very quickly......might provide some entertainment?

:D
 

MCR247

Established Member
Joined
7 Nov 2008
Messages
10,291
Myth xxxx - the rapid beeping does not mean the doors are about to close, it's a signal for you to lean out of the carriage and peer menacingly up and down the (now empty) platform.

(Must be a January thing, last night and tonight I witnessed the same thing, two different individuals).

Here's a thought; have a guillotine-type razor edge to the doors and make them close very, very, very quickly......might provide some entertainment?

:D

Reminds me when on a 96ts at Wembley Park, the guy jumped on when the doors were beeping, assuming that they'd open again, like lift doors, it was a bit of a shock when they just kept pushing. Made a few commuters giggle :lol:
 

Flamingo

Established Member
Joined
26 Apr 2010
Messages
6,806
Myth no whatever: If you are in a railway uniform, what you really want to spend your day doing is talking to rail enthusiasts about the minutiae of routes / stock / history of the railway.
 

sprinterguy

Veteran Member
Joined
4 Mar 2010
Messages
11,571
Location
Macclesfield
Of course it is. But where did I say it isn't?

You stated that it could be myth number 3 and that "everything else is just people having a moan", which suggested to me that you validated that one as an actual myth, and not just another moan. Just a misunderstanding then if that isn’t the case!
 

Striker

Member
Joined
6 Dec 2010
Messages
503
You stated that it could be myth number 3 and that "everything else is just people having a moan", which suggested to me that you validated that one as an actual myth, and not just another moan. Just a misunderstanding then if that isn’t the case!

I was merely commenting on the fact that there are about 3 genuine myths in this thread. However, on re-reading it, you are correct and it does appear I was validating the myth about Pacers. I would be harsh on anybody else so it's only fair that I am equally harsh on myself.
 
Last edited:

scotsman

Established Member
Joined
6 Jul 2010
Messages
3,252
Myth { (2SinX-1)^2 when x=3} There is little skill required to drive a train
 

tbtc

Veteran Member
Joined
16 Dec 2008
Messages
18,054
Location
Reston City Centre
I think one Myth that has to be repeated is:

The majority of passengers prefer my favourite type of coach/ engine/ haulage (or agree with my views on other things)

Its funny how often you hear phrases like "most passengers prefer Mk III coaches to Pendolinos" or "most passengers prefer trollies to buffets" or "most passengers think that the 158s were better than the 170s"...

TBH I rarely hear passengers actually talk about the trains they are on, but its funny how often other people overhear conversations which happen to agree with the prejudice of the listener... ;)
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
32,909
Location
Fenny Stratford
I often ask passengers actually! I instiagte a conversation. You get lots of intresting info if you actually talk to people rather than just hand out a questionairre.
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
30,885
Location
UK
Its funny how often you hear phrases like "most passengers prefer Mk III coaches to Pendolinos" or "most passengers prefer trollies to buffets" or "most passengers think that the 158s were better than the 170s"...

TBH I rarely hear passengers actually talk about the trains they are on, but its funny how often other people overhear conversations which happen to agree with the prejudice of the listener... ;)

Yes, I can't recall overhearing anyone talking about one train over another. That is unless I'm in someway involved with the conversation, and that's rare as nobody else would have a clue what I was talking about if I started talking about trains by their class.

My wife had to go to Manchester yesterday, and I asked her what her journey was like and she said it was fine except she had no window! She didn't seem that bothered mind, and certainly didn't compare it to any other type of train.

In her mind, it was a train that went along tracks and got her from A to B. I am sure most people think like that.
 

Broken Viking

On Moderation
Joined
23 Oct 2006
Messages
1,666
Location
some place west of France
Myth 66601: The maximum safe speed for trains on the ECML, WCML and WoE lines is (A pitiful) 125mph.
Myth 66602: Eurostars are still capable of calling at Waterloo Intl. in times of need without additional traction.
Myth 66603: The Advanced Passenger Train wasn't the greatest piece of engineering in BR's history, ;)
Myth 66604: No train may pass through Rugby, Gjorvik, Manchester Picadilly, Birmingham New St, or Ash at any speed greater than 90mph.
Myth 66605: HSTs will be fitted with powered sliding doors.
Myth 66606: Pacers are incapable of speeds over 45mph.
Myth 66607: Pacers would be unsafe at speeds above 90mph.
Myth 66608: Pacers can't be upgraded for 175mph operation along the WCML... <D

I'll come up with some more after dinner... ;)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Joined
26 Sep 2009
Messages
556
Location
Bishops Stortford
Myth 12: DVTs are too light to stay on the track in the event of a crash

(DBSOs are a different story....)

It might be a myth now, but it didn't used to be. There was a serious accident some years ago involving some cows that strayed onto the operational railway (more info here) after which, as I understand it, several tonnes of ballast in the form of a concrete slab, were added to the floor area of DVTs.
 

Eng274

Member
Joined
19 Aug 2010
Messages
796
It might be a myth now, but it didn't used to be. There was a serious accident some years ago involving some cows that strayed onto the operational railway (more info here) after which, as I understand it, several tonnes of ballast in the form of a concrete slab, were added to the floor area of DVTs.

Even when the 225 sets were entering service, i believe it was reiterated that the DVT was weighted down enough to cope with such a scenario, to reassure the public if anything else.

A DVT weighs something in the region of 45 tonnes unladen. When you consider its still a short, empty, unpowered van with a cab, it makes you think how much added concrete there must be to bring it up to ~45t.
 

tbtc

Veteran Member
Joined
16 Dec 2008
Messages
18,054
Location
Reston City Centre
Yes, I can't recall overhearing anyone talking about one train over another. That is unless I'm in someway involved with the conversation, and that's rare as nobody else would have a clue what I was talking about if I started talking about trains by their class.

My wife had to go to Manchester yesterday, and I asked her what her journey was like and she said it was fine except she had no window! She didn't seem that bothered mind, and certainly didn't compare it to any other type of train.

In her mind, it was a train that went along tracks and got her from A to B. I am sure most people think like that.

I know we obsess about these things, but I've had conversations with people after journeys where they couldn't remember the colour of the train, whether it had "manual" doors, whether it was a double decker (in the case of bus journeys)... people don't pay the attention that we do
 

ralphchadkirk

Established Member
Joined
20 Oct 2008
Messages
5,754
Location
Essex
I know we obsess about these things, but I've had conversations with people after journeys where they couldn't remember the colour of the train, whether it had "manual" doors, whether it was a double decker (in the case of bus journeys)... people don't pay the attention that we do

Hence why the people who make Great British Railway Journey's probably don't care about whether they reverse footage or not!
 

Broken Viking

On Moderation
Joined
23 Oct 2006
Messages
1,666
Location
some place west of France
Even when the 225 sets were entering service, i believe it was reiterated that the DVT was weighted down enough to cope with such a scenario, to reassure the public if anything else.

A DVT weighs something in the region of 45 tonnes unladen. When you consider its still a short, empty, unpowered van with a cab, it makes you think how much added concrete there must be to bring it up to ~45t.
I've never really seen the point of DVTs...Wouldn't it have made more sense just to stick another 91 on the south end? It'd give the train a lot more power and speed for only a little extra weight! <D

Myth 3xx+0: Railcard discounts are available on all tickets types at all times. :oops:
Myth 3xx+1: Toilets still should not be flushed in stations. (Only applies to HSTs and railtours now.)
Myth 3xx+2: AToC know what they're doing. ;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top