deltic1989
Established Member
Myth no oh I don't know abot 250 by now? Pacers are perfectly fit for purpose and are in no way out dated or pointless.
Myth no oh I don't know abot 250 by now? Pacers are perfectly fit for purpose and are in no way out dated or pointless.
Myth no oh I don't know abot 250 by now? Pacers are perfectly fit for purpose and are in no way out dated or pointless.
Semaphore signalling for one!Again what would you have done at the time? I'm sure a lot of people on here that moan about Pacers either:
1) Think BR had pots of gold
2) Have never ridden on one in their life
3) Think new rolling stock can appear at the click of a finger.
Pacers do their job well, and there are other things that are older and still working on the railway.
Myth xxxx - the rapid beeping does not mean the doors are about to close, it's a signal for you to lean out of the carriage and peer menacingly up and down the (now empty) platform.
(Must be a January thing, last night and tonight I witnessed the same thing, two different individuals).
Here's a thought; have a guillotine-type razor edge to the doors and make them close very, very, very quickly......might provide some entertainment?
![]()
Myth no oh I don't know abot 250 by now? Pacers are perfectly fit for purpose and are in no way out dated or pointless.
I think it's about myth no. 3. Everything else is just people having a moan.
And deltic1989s' post isn't an unfounded moan about Pacers??
Of course it is. But where did I say it isn't?
You stated that it could be myth number 3 and that "everything else is just people having a moan", which suggested to me that you validated that one as an actual myth, and not just another moan. Just a misunderstanding then if that isn’t the case!
The majority of passengers prefer my favourite type of coach/ engine/ haulage (or agree with my views on other things)
Its funny how often you hear phrases like "most passengers prefer Mk III coaches to Pendolinos" or "most passengers prefer trollies to buffets" or "most passengers think that the 158s were better than the 170s"...
TBH I rarely hear passengers actually talk about the trains they are on, but its funny how often other people overhear conversations which happen to agree with the prejudice of the listener...![]()
Myth 12: DVTs are too light to stay on the track in the event of a crash
(DBSOs are a different story....)
It might be a myth now, but it didn't used to be. There was a serious accident some years ago involving some cows that strayed onto the operational railway (more info here) after which, as I understand it, several tonnes of ballast in the form of a concrete slab, were added to the floor area of DVTs.
Yes, I can't recall overhearing anyone talking about one train over another. That is unless I'm in someway involved with the conversation, and that's rare as nobody else would have a clue what I was talking about if I started talking about trains by their class.
My wife had to go to Manchester yesterday, and I asked her what her journey was like and she said it was fine except she had no window! She didn't seem that bothered mind, and certainly didn't compare it to any other type of train.
In her mind, it was a train that went along tracks and got her from A to B. I am sure most people think like that.
I know we obsess about these things, but I've had conversations with people after journeys where they couldn't remember the colour of the train, whether it had "manual" doors, whether it was a double decker (in the case of bus journeys)... people don't pay the attention that we do
I've never really seen the point of DVTs...Wouldn't it have made more sense just to stick another 91 on the south end? It'd give the train a lot more power and speed for only a little extra weight!Even when the 225 sets were entering service, i believe it was reiterated that the DVT was weighted down enough to cope with such a scenario, to reassure the public if anything else.
A DVT weighs something in the region of 45 tonnes unladen. When you consider its still a short, empty, unpowered van with a cab, it makes you think how much added concrete there must be to bring it up to ~45t.