• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Railway General Knowledge.

Peter Mugridge

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Apr 2010
Messages
17,799
Location
Epsom
08 600 - that was Ivor ( at Slade Green depot, but not in capital stock ) wasn't it?

Floor's open if I'm right.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

D6975

Established Member
Joined
26 Nov 2009
Messages
3,046
Location
Bristol
Wasn't one of them named Thor to replace the one named Thor that was written off. Don't know it's d number but was 47 091.
d1671 was the written off loco & d1677 was then given the name.
If correct, What was 08 600 named when in departmental use?

That's right, the replacement Thor D1677 was the next to be named.
 

clagmonster

Established Member
Joined
8 Jun 2005
Messages
2,442
Thomas was 08500 at Doncaster was it not? I don't recall it entering departmental stock.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Would it be 97801 Pluto, the RTC loco at Mickleover?
 

Mvann

Member
Joined
19 Mar 2010
Messages
790
Location
Peterborough
Thomas was 08500 at Doncaster was it not? I don't recall it entering departmental stock.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Would it be 97801 Pluto, the RTC loco at Mickleover?

Pluto is correct.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
What was the cause of the 1924 lytham accident and what technology might have prevented it.
 

Johnuk123

Established Member
Joined
19 Mar 2012
Messages
2,800
It was a broken engine tyre which caused a derailment and collision with a bridge and signalbox.

The investigating officer urged research into ways of finding flaws in metal.
Of course Ultrasonic testing was a long time away then but now it is brilliant and can detect the smallest faults.
 

Johnuk123

Established Member
Joined
19 Mar 2012
Messages
2,800
A dedicated group are hoping to reopen a line which is still connected to Network Rail.

This line is classed as a siding and is 10 miles long, where is it ?
 

Welshman

Established Member
Joined
11 Mar 2010
Messages
3,068
OK, while LE Greys is having his bath, try this:-

What distiinctive feature did the 1st gen Cravens dmu cabs have, compared with the other 1st gen dmus?
 

Welshman

Established Member
Joined
11 Mar 2010
Messages
3,068
They did, but I specifically asked about the cabs, cf. the cabs of other 1st gen dmus.
 

Welshman

Established Member
Joined
11 Mar 2010
Messages
3,068
Yes, they did, but that did not distinguish them from other dmus as some of the later Swindon "Cross-Country" [later Cl.120] and "Intercity" units had just two larger windows.
Think about the driver's desk itself.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
As I'm going to be away from my computer for a few days, the answer I had in mind was that the Cravens dmus had an angled driver's desk [it sloped down towards the driver], as opposed to, I think, all the rest, which were horizontal.
I don't know whether that was suppose to make it easier for the driver to handle the controls, but it did create a problem as to where to stand your mug of tea!
 

LE Greys

Established Member
Joined
6 Mar 2010
Messages
5,389
Location
Hitchin
OK, I'll move back in, but might be a bit slow in replying. A simple question, which was the fastest non-streamlined steam locomotive and who were the crew?
 

Mvann

Member
Joined
19 Mar 2010
Messages
790
Location
Peterborough
Not the one I was thinking of. This one has had two names during its time as part of the national network and the third in preservation.
 

Johnuk123

Established Member
Joined
19 Mar 2012
Messages
2,800
Not the one I was thinking of. This one has had two names during its time as part of the national network and the third in preservation.

I think you may need to provide a clue in this one or it will still be current at Christmas.
 

Top