• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

RailUK banners

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Gizmogle

Established Member
Joined
28 Aug 2006
Messages
6,015
ruk1zg0.jpg


961x134 FCC Banner.

I would use that!
 

P156KWJ

Established Member
Joined
26 Nov 2007
Messages
4,226
Location
Nottinghamshire
re-done the Sheffield departure one with better (and more professional specially for D306 and Gizmogle :p) text.
 

Attachments

  • Ruk10.jpg
    Ruk10.jpg
    108 KB · Views: 15

devon_metro

Established Member
Joined
11 Oct 2005
Messages
7,715
Location
London
Most of the recent photos in here aren't good enough quality. Don't see whats professional about Italic font anyway 156401 :?

I'll agree with Gizmogle that there is a limit on banners.
 

Gizmogle

Established Member
Joined
28 Aug 2006
Messages
6,015
Italic is about as professional as you can get with MS Paint, right 156401?

I don't like the font used on the banners. What happened to the old RailUK font? Apparently TC gave you (Mojo and the admins I assume?) a copy. It was called "Eurostar" or something.

What happened to the themes that Tom Cairns made? They were great. I would have a different one every day cause I liked them all so much.
 

P156KWJ

Established Member
Joined
26 Nov 2007
Messages
4,226
Location
Nottinghamshire
Italic is about as professional as you can get with MS Paint, right 156401?

I don't like the font used on the banners. What happened to the old RailUK font? Apparently TC gave you (Mojo and the admins I assume?) a copy. It was called "Eurostar" or something.

What happened to the themes that Tom Cairns made? They were great. I would have a different one every day cause I liked them all so much.

I dont use bloody paint! I use Adobe Photoshop for the text and Microsoft picture manager for the cropping - and for some reason photoshop doesn't allow you to make it bold or italic etc on certain fonts. I use Tahoma usually, you can't get the eurostar font on XP
 

Gizmogle

Established Member
Joined
28 Aug 2006
Messages
6,015
hellfireol0.png


I agree with the image.

And 156401, if you use Photoshop, then why not add some shading or something to make the text stand out a little more.
 

Mintona

Established Member
Joined
8 Jan 2006
Messages
3,592
Location
South West
I'm using the CrossCountry one, but I also rather like the FGW HST at Cockwood Harbour and the green 47 at Rugeley Trent Valley.
I don't think any of the banners are bad per se, I just prefer some over others. But I think to say they're ugly is a bit harsh, because someone took that photo, and Mojo spent time creating them for your use.
 

Gizmogle

Established Member
Joined
28 Aug 2006
Messages
6,015
Yeah, fair enough, that was a little harsh, but there are very few of these themes that I would use.

I'm still on the default theme.

Now, the CrossCountry one is good, but it's just the way the image is slightly too sharp and distorted that bothers me.
 

Mintona

Established Member
Joined
8 Jan 2006
Messages
3,592
Location
South West
I don't think it looks too sharp or distorted in any way, this is the original image, which doesn't look too bad in my opinion.
But then, maybe I'm biased as it is my photo? :p
 

P156KWJ

Established Member
Joined
26 Nov 2007
Messages
4,226
Location
Nottinghamshire
right, this time, it's not had anything stupid done to it (not that I call italic stupid :?) but it is still white, as I still think it goes better, as the background is busier
 

Attachments

  • RUK4 copy2.jpg
    RUK4 copy2.jpg
    107.8 KB · Views: 15

devon_metro

Established Member
Joined
11 Oct 2005
Messages
7,715
Location
London
ruk7-1.jpg


Or if we use the true RUK font give or take a few minor details:
ruk8.jpg

Something I quickly knocked up. Mojo I notice that the shadow on many of you 1600xXXX banners seems to end unusually?
 

Gizmogle

Established Member
Joined
28 Aug 2006
Messages
6,015
Ohh, I like that Liam, just a shame my res is too small to appreciate the best part of the picture!
The first one is best.


rukfarnorthcw0.jpg

Credit to Tom Cairns
 

P156KWJ

Established Member
Joined
26 Nov 2007
Messages
4,226
Location
Nottinghamshire
so after me listening to people's views and redoing a banner four times to get it right, no-one comments :roll:;)
 

Gizmogle

Established Member
Joined
28 Aug 2006
Messages
6,015
Liam I would definately use the flipped one :)

Yes, 156401, you're pictures have a somewhat dark, grainy vintage look to them. Which isn't really a good thing when you're photting units.
 

P156KWJ

Established Member
Joined
26 Nov 2007
Messages
4,226
Location
Nottinghamshire
and most of your train pics don't even come out that well. they're all to dark and they're occasionally blury

that's cos I used to use 35mm film, as I am also interested in other aspects of photography. Video is more my thing really these days.
Also, on your banners of the choppers and the EWS 08, it looks like it's snowing, so you can't criticise me for my 'blury' pics - when yours aren't exactly superior either.also, if you knew that much about photography and understood about depth of field, you'd understand more, but obviously you don't. Also, I would like a decent digital camera as well as my camcorder, but unfortunately I cannot possibly afford it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top