TheWierdOne
Member
In other Chunnel news, the ORR has accepted Eurostar’s appeal over how LSPH allocated Virgin track access rights.
www.railmagazine.com
I’m no railway legal expert but I’d be surprised if that is sufficient to overturn the track access decision? Surely the onus is on Eurostar to get themselves sorted and make an application so they can have their plans considered first?
Eurostar appeal over Virgin HS1 track access agreement accepted
Office of Rail and Road asking for representations after Eurostar complains about "unfair" process of London St Pancras Highspeed.
The Office of Rail and Road (ORR) has started a formal process which will look into the procedure followed by LSPH in relation to the allocation of HS1 track capacity.
Eurostar submitted an appeal within days of ORR pre-approving the agreement for Virgin to have HS1 pathsfrom October 2030. It accused LPSH of giving “special status” to Virgin and “unlawfully reserving capacity” for its future rival.
Describing the process as “non-transparent and unfair”, Eurostar said: “The position of (LSPH) amounts to the assertion that there is a ‘first come, first served’ regulatory obligation in respect of competing applications or requests for capacity but it is unable to point to any specific regulatory basis for this assertion.”
Well I bet that’s going to make the negotiations over Temple Mills access quite awkward. Eurostar seem to be claiming that LSPH made an error by not judging Virgin’s request against a potential future Eurostar request.Representations must be made by October 2 with a decision due by December 4.
I’m no railway legal expert but I’d be surprised if that is sufficient to overturn the track access decision? Surely the onus is on Eurostar to get themselves sorted and make an application so they can have their plans considered first?