• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Project Mapping all stations map

Status
Not open for further replies.

tractakid

Member
Joined
12 Nov 2012
Messages
852
Location
Milton Keynes
You raise an interesting point. I guess the crux of the issue is the difference between regularity and frequency.

On this track, FGW is regular but infrequent, SWT is irregular but more frequent.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
34,269
I don't see that really, for weekdays at least - the only thing FGW have going for their service is that weekends are much better than SWT.

On a weekday, SWT's eastbound trains are just as regular as FGW's single service, in fact the afternoon SWT service (Fareham to Waterloo via Havant) only runs an hour or two after FGWs Great Malvern to Brighton. The two real oddballs are SWT's late evening Havant to Fareham passenger services, they are very much out of the ordinary pattern.
 

kieron

Established Member
Joined
22 Mar 2012
Messages
3,277
Location
Connah's Quay
How is the decision made on whether to show a route as 'limited'? SWT run more weekday passenger services (five) along the top of the Farlington triangle than FGW (three), so why are SWT shown limited and FGW 'normal'?
I think the upper limit is supposed to be somewhere near 1tpd each way. I make both operators to run 10tpw eastbound and 15tpw west, comfortably above that figure.

The map isn't on the Project Mapping site yet. When it is, it should hopefully say what was supposed to have changed this time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top