Loppylugs
Member
Anyone know what the problem is at Kemble? 6C52 held for 40 minutes, disruption all afternoon and now a 1Z99 on it's way there from Gloucester.
Many thanks for the info. 6C52 was held at Minety Crossing from around 13-30 until 14-10.6J83 broken down - line blocked in the Swindon to Standish Jn direction only.
I'm unaware of the 6C52 in the region.
Services for South Wales and Cheltenham Spa services are diverting via Bristol Parkway (with reversal there) before heading up to Gloucester to continue the journey, adding about 35m to journey times.
We don't put dets down as part of assistance protection any more, so on that basis the driver of the failed train was correct.Just coupling up now, delayed more as the failed train never put any detts down until prompted!
Just coupling up now, delayed more as the failed train never put any detts down until prompted!
We don't put dets down as part of assistance protection any more, so on that basis the driver of the failed train was correct.
We still don't put dets down, we just go to the place where we would've placed then prior to the Rule Book change.Unless…….the Stroud Valley isn’t a very good place for GSMR reception in places, also sight lines aren’t good again in places so detonation protection might well of been required.
Except….always an exception to the rule.We still don't put dets down, we just go to the place where we would've placed then prior to the Rule Book change.
6J83 was a Tamper/ Track mtce machine , the fact that unusually TWO rescue locos were reqd could mean the failed machine had no operational brakes and was rescued in a through brake pipe situation.
nevertheless it caused much unwanted disruption to passenger services for several hours.
I trust a full investigation will be undertaken by NR with the operating/mtce Contractor responsible for the operation and maintenance of this track machine.
There's no exceptions to this rule – assistance protection doesn't include dets! No, I'm not at all keen on it either.Except….always an exception to the rule.
Personally I don’t agree with it, another cost/time saving cut to the rules to suit the performance driven railway.
Oh go on, be a devil.Having read the log (which I won’t repeat, nor should anyone else)