• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Poor modern train toilets

Status
Not open for further replies.

Liverpool 507

Member
Joined
17 Jan 2018
Messages
642
Location
Merseyside
As a former train cleaner, it is easier to clean metal toilet basins as they block very rarely. I used to dread cleaning toilets on units with porcelain toilets (142s, 319s and 323s before PRM mods) as they blocked easily and didn't lock out if the water tanks had dried out. CETing units with non vacuum flush also took forever and is quicker on those with vacuum toilets.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Joined
21 May 2014
Messages
964
I've noticed on the new 197s if you try to dry your hands, the sensor for the hand drier is too close to the water sensor and you just end up getting wetter hands!

I had exactly this on a CrossCountry 170 a couple of weeks back. I expect it's the same or similar tap/soap/dryer unit.
 

Doomotron

Established Member
Joined
25 Jun 2018
Messages
1,423
Location
Kent
I was on a GA 720 yesterday, and the sliding door on the accessible loo would not stay shut - luckily the poor woman who wanted to use the loo had yet to sit down to commence proceedings.

Personally I think the most functional if not the most upmarket on-train loo I've used in the last few years was on a SE 466 - manual "slam door", simple lock, wide enough door to easily get in and out (not PRM compliant obviously), enough water in the vacuum loo to keep the bowl clean, press button tap with decent water flow and temperature, and a slightly raised lip across the sink front to stop any water sloshing on to the floor. Oh and a wall mounted fairly powerful hand dryer (typical of restaurant loos).

Very decent IMO.
I also found the frosted window to be very nice in the Networkers, having some might in there was a nice change.
 

antharro

Member
Joined
20 Dec 2006
Messages
709
The 442s also had the frosted window. I think it was fairly common on BR stock; I recall SWR's 158s and 159s having it, and I think 315s and 317s.
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
19,833
Location
East Anglia
Outdated
at least one thing is broken.
often find them very dirty
loose panels
sink is small

I suppose they serve a purpose at times of need although I do find them really outdated now in comparison with new rolling stock especially 755s. I must admit that on my patch EMR keep them nice & as clean as possible.
 

fandroid

Established Member
Joined
9 Nov 2014
Messages
2,560
Location
Hampshire
Porcelain was used due to it being made to last, and still look new 50 years down the line. I don't think the older design engineers were worried about one or two extra pounds of weight on la bog.
I seem to remember porcelain WC bowls being normal on the East Coast mainline both on IC140s and HSTs. They always looked good and I never saw a chipped one.
I recently read a Hitachi report on attitudes to public transport. Toilets were highlighted as an area of concern, many people are turned off from using them (particularly the accessible toilets) for two reasons; noise and the fear of the door opening while 'in use'.
I believe that the standards for toilets on new stock now require mechanical locking, not the worrying push button.

The ludicrous splashing problem that the narrow hand basins have on the GWR and East Coast Hitachi trains could be mostly solved by changing the angle on the water nozzles to point more towards the backplate rather than straight down.
 

lxfe_mxtterz

Member
Joined
3 Mar 2018
Messages
1,070
Location
Sarahdale (West of Emmerdale)
Paper towels would be great, but there are various prohibitive reasons why they're not widely used. The cost of paper is through the roof and as a single use product is unsustainable. The units would require filling at turnaround and in transit putting pressure on an already time-poor process and the units would need a full redesign for waste disposal, as well as a lack of storage on many modern units. Add on top the paper detritus that would be left all over the place, it makes it a no go. But fully agree on asthmatic dryers resulting in the 'trouser dry' process being infinitely preferable!
The last time I was on a Class 222, I was blessed with the option of either the hand dryer (cannot comment on whether or not it was "asthmatic" as I didn't use it) or some wonderful paper towels.

Was rather impressed and pleased with the toilet offering considering the rest of the train was quite literally falling apart...
 

Jozhua

Established Member
Joined
6 Jan 2019
Messages
1,891
The IETs are the strongest in terms of bathroom offering in my experience - some may find the 'space saver' toilets annoying, but I much prefer having the extra capacity - plus two right next to each other massively reduces the chance of any long waiting times. If you don't like them still, as always, the accessible bathrooms are still available! The fit and finish is the highest quality in those, actually feeling like a rather premium option.

What tends to bug me is that toilets always seem to be left untouched during refurbs. The only exception being the new bathrooms fitted to 150s, 156s, etc during the PRM drive. 170 toilets are looking pretty dated these days.

Toilet provision strikes me as rather weak for the 195s and especially 331s, where there can be as few as one bathroom per three carriages, made worse when said bathroom is out of order. Otherwise, I rather like those trains.

Of course there is the 220/221, which has the ventilation system that pipes the smell of the waste storage tanks directly into the main passenger compartment, so everyone can feel like they are in the bathroom. Works out quite well if you can't get to it, due to being crushed in like it's a Tokyo metro line (except you are on it for 4 hours, not 4 minutes...).
 

Krokodil

Established Member
Joined
23 Jan 2023
Messages
6,532
Location
Wales
The Azuma/IET dryers are probably the best of any train hand dryers and do actually dry your hands
Hear hear. It's about the only good thing I have to say about the units.

One bugbear I have with many designs is that the labels aren't very accurately placed. They tell you in which order the soap/water/dryer are placed, but the graphics seem to be designed with no regard for the actual space between each outlet. Therefore I end up having to look underneath to find out where the tap and its sensor actually are.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Of course there is the 220/221, which has the ventilation system that pipes the smell of the waste storage tanks directly into the main passenger compartment
Nicely warmed up by the exhaust pipe too!
 

NorthernSpirit

Established Member
Joined
21 Jun 2013
Messages
2,274
I believe that's a function of them being compliant with the relevant standards. You're supposed to be able to sit on a disabled toilet, do you business and then reach the handwashing facilities without needing to stand back up from the toilet. I agree it makes it a bit more uncomfortable but there is some method to the madness!

The Azuma/IET slim line toilets are annoying. The sink is probably a perfectly adequate size but the water is fed from such a great height that it of course spills everywhere! Why they couldn't put the outlet for the water about 15cm lower is beyond me! Also bring back paper handtowels! At least make it possible to dry my hands rather than having an asthmatic ant blowing on them like basically all train hand dryers do.
This brings me to the question of why didn't the rolling stock manufacturers bring in firms such as Healthmatic to design a useable but compliant to the regulations toilet? I've used the public toilets in Selby (who are built by Healthmatic) and I cannot see why such a design cannot be incorparated into train design. It would address the current issues of poorly positioned sinks / hand dryers and also the toilet paper dispenser itself.
 

AlastairFraser

Established Member
Joined
12 Aug 2018
Messages
4,158
The 185 non-accessible toilets are ridiculously small in my opinion, I could barely move last I deigned to use one. And the 195/331s have a complicated locking system and seem to get visibly grimy very easily - poor colour choices by CAF perhaps!

TPE definitely have improved on the 397 toilets though, and the Pendo toilets are still decent.
 
Joined
28 Jun 2012
Messages
832
Location
Epsom Downs
Not the worst I've ever used tho - I used the toilets on a GWR 150 (150001, I believe) when it was on the Basingstoke - Reading, and the hand dryer was pretty much just a noise making device. Same for the ones on SWR's 158 and 159s, but at least they have semi-decent taps.
The EMU hand dryers work better as they work off 110V not 24V for 15x. This is the hand dryer 15/3161 it has a little matrix radiator inside which blocks which stifles the heat side and because of the voltage being run off 24V isn’t very powerful. If the voltage through that coach drops below the minimum required to keep the brakes off then that’s games over and you get dragging brakes. SWR changed to a vanity unit around 2014/5.
 

Attachments

  • CBA83B23-6BB1-4DC2-AEA8-4BBB706A978C.jpeg
    CBA83B23-6BB1-4DC2-AEA8-4BBB706A978C.jpeg
    106.5 KB · Views: 76

EdChap

Member
Joined
30 Nov 2018
Messages
37
For comparison, I travelled on the VSOE last year and found their toilets to be very civilised. Highly recommended!!
 

Halwynd

Member
Joined
11 Sep 2021
Messages
565
Location
North West
Push button locks - I just don't trust them, certainly wouldn't go for a No 2 in one. Saw one in action in a Pendolino once... the door just kept opening and closing all the way to Euston. If I can find one with a proper physical lock, fine - no matter how small and cramped.

Another bugbear: toilets in the passenger compartment - very unhygienic. British Rail put toilets in the vestibules of Mk1/2/3 stock for a reason.
 
Last edited:

Blindtraveler

Established Member
Joined
28 Feb 2011
Messages
10,544
All the Hitachi units seemed and develop a very spongy subsiding floor in all the toilet compartment after a while. It took awhile to happen on the 395 but is now now.and and not at all long to happen in the small toilets on IET units and recently noticed collapsing floors in the accessible toilet on ScotRail 385. I am fraid I can't agree with the IET hand dryer being the best on the network, that title rests for now with the 390 and the Virgin refurbished voyages.

By far my biggest complaint however is is the multitude of different positions for door operating and other control buttons levers and sensors. A regular blind man's headache. I also get very rapidly fed up with lack of water or being full or all the other faults that could cause them to go out of service. We could do with a fleet of sludge pumping mobile units that go round emptying tanks in a a controlled odour three-way at at terminal stations. I know some units don't have a long turn around and it might present a challenge for a full IET set for example Burt it really wouldn't be difficult on other stock especially that with small tanks
 

Doomotron

Established Member
Joined
25 Jun 2018
Messages
1,423
Location
Kent
All the Hitachi units seemed and develop a very spongy subsiding floor in all the toilet compartment after a while. It took awhile to happen on the 395 but is now now.and and not at all long to happen in the small toilets on IET units and recently noticed collapsing floors in the accessible toilet on ScotRail 385. I am fraid I can't agree with the IET hand dryer being the best on the network, that title rests for now with the 390 and the Virgin refurbished voyages.

By far my biggest complaint however is is the multitude of different positions for door operating and other control buttons levers and sensors. A regular blind man's headache. I also get very rapidly fed up with lack of water or being full or all the other faults that could cause them to go out of service. We could do with a fleet of sludge pumping mobile units that go round emptying tanks in a a controlled odour three-way at at terminal stations. I know some units don't have a long turn around and it might present a challenge for a full IET set for example Burt it really wouldn't be difficult on other stock especially that with small tanks
I'm pretty sure the spongy floor is as intended. It helps keep you stable when standing up when the train is bumpy.
 

Skie

Established Member
Joined
22 Dec 2008
Messages
1,238
The 390s do now have great sink units after Virgin upgraded the dryer. Decent water sensor and allocation, obvious soap dispenser and a nice strong jet dryer. Water can be a bit scalding though!

Most other trains suffer from multiple flaws, be it infuriatingly hard to trigger sensors, a thimble of water when you do trigger it, treacle like soap that can’t be washed off with the water it wants to give you and a horde of hamsters being squeezed of air to dry your wet hands.

I fully expect First to “upgrade” the 390 toilets one day by cutting out a hole in the body for you to stick your hands out to dry them, being the cheap buggers they are.
 

kkong

Member
Joined
8 Sep 2008
Messages
1,135
The cost of paper is through the roof and as a single use product is unsustainable. The units would require filling at turnaround and in transit putting pressure on an already time-poor process and the units would need a full redesign for waste disposal, as well as a lack of storage on many modern units. Add on top the paper detritus that would be left all over the place, it makes it a no go.

I can't believe that the cost of paper towels factors anywhere near the top (or middle) of whole system costs for toilets for TOCs.

Look up the bulk costs of kitchen roll / toilet paper for the likes of Amazon's own brand "Presto"; this grade of paper is not expensive.

The ScotRail HSTs have paper hand towels and I much prefer those to "hot air" hand dryers.

There are also other personal hygiene uses for paper towels than wiping your hands, which hot air dryers are no substitute for.
 

Mikey C

Established Member
Joined
11 Feb 2013
Messages
8,240
I can't believe that the cost of paper towels factors anywhere near the top (or middle) of whole system costs for toilets for TOCs.

Look up the bulk costs of kitchen roll / toilet paper for the likes of Amazon's own brand "Presto"; this grade of paper is not expensive.

The ScotRail HSTs have paper hand towels and I much prefer those to "hot air" hand dryers.

There are also other personal hygiene uses for paper towels than wiping your hands, which hot air dryers are no substitute for.
It's not the cost of the towels that is the issue.

It's the cost of having to regularly refill them, and empty the basket. And indeed checking them regularly, as they might get used faster one day than another. Plus the mess from anti-social behaviour.
 

Bikeman78

Established Member
Joined
26 Apr 2018
Messages
6,172
The Azuma/IET slim line toilets are annoying. The sink is probably a perfectly adequate size but the water is fed from such a great height that it of course spills everywhere! Why they couldn't put the outlet for the water about 15cm lower is beyond me! Also bring back paper handtowels! At least make it possible to dry my hands rather than having an asthmatic ant blowing on them like basically all train hand dryers do.
Spot the Blackadder fan! Older toilets typically had a pipe or nozzle that stuck out of the back wall. I could see exactly where the water was going to go. For some reason, most modern toilets have a wall above the sink with the nozzle coming out of the bottom. I cannot see the tap, or the sensor that makes it work, when standing up. Why is this deemed to be the way forward?

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

I recently read a Hitachi report on attitudes to public transport. Toilets were highlighted as an area of concern, many people are turned off from using them (particularly the accessible toilets) for two reasons; noise and the fear of the door opening while 'in use'.
To make it as bad as possible, the control buttons are out of reach of anyone sitting on the throne. Especially embarrassing on 150s because the door faces down the saloon.
 
Last edited:

Jozhua

Established Member
Joined
6 Jan 2019
Messages
1,891
Seeing the old royal carriages in National Railway Museum a few months ago made me think maybe we should bring back freestanding bathroom furniture on trains!

That said, jokes aside, there is probably scope to make train bathrooms a little easier to refit/refurbish in the future when required.
Nicely warmed up by the exhaust pipe too!
Of course! Keeps the cabin cosy
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
44,310
Location
Yorks
It's not the cost of the towels that is the issue.

It's the cost of having to regularly refill them, and empty the basket. And indeed checking them regularly, as they might get used faster one day than another. Plus the mess from anti-social behaviour.

But all those things are true of bog roll - which just gets used in place of paper towels if the hand dryer isn't up to scratch.

The best train toilets currently are the mk4's, although they were less good after Virgin replaced the paper towels with a hand dryer.
 

Tetchytyke

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Sep 2013
Messages
17,474
Location
Isle of Man
But all those things are true of bog roll - which just gets used in place of paper towels if the hand dryer isn't up to scratch.

Toilet paper is bad enough at causing a blockage but at least it's designed to dissolve in water, paper towels would seriously damage the plumbing on trains. And we all know that stuffing a huge wad of paper towels down the loo is the first thing kids would do on late night trains.
 

Mikey C

Established Member
Joined
11 Feb 2013
Messages
8,240
On a positive note, I did like the wall covering on an LNWR 350 toilet I used last week, designed to look like traditional tiles :D
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
113,091
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
On a positive note, I did like the wall covering on an LNWR 350 toilet I used last week, designed to look like traditional tiles :D

Vinylling the inside of the compartment is a great anti vandal measure. Shiny vinyl is harder to graffiti to start with, the patterns mean it doesn't show up as well, and if it is graffitied it can be pulled off and replaced.
 

HarryF

Member
Joined
31 Jul 2022
Messages
162
Location
UK
Vinylling the inside of the compartment is a great anti vandal measure. Shiny vinyl is harder to graffiti to start with, the patterns mean it doesn't show up as well, and if it is graffitied it can be pulled off and replaced.
Agreed and wish Thameslink would stick some vinyl in the 700 toilets
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top