Matt Taylor
Established Member
Sadly more fatalities today. Two. Thoughts go out to all those concerned.
Make that three.:cry:
Sadly more fatalities today. Two. Thoughts go out to all those concerned.
Make that three.:cry:
More likely to be off the platform, so the 2L73 next to the 1L73 is more likely.
(As an aside, aren't those two reporting numbers helpful for signallers)
I will put my head above the parapet to be shot at!
With modern technology does the time honoured system of route signing need to be as restrictive as it is? I suggest that an aircraft is more dangerous than a train,
not least because it is not attached to the ground, but a qualified pilot can go anywhere relying on navigation systems to tell the way.
In the case of the Byfleet curve, for example, which is little used, why can there not be the equivalent of a sophisticated sat nav system showing the route, speed restrictions, signals and anything else necessary so that any driver could follow it if necessary?
Only asking!
Unfortunately it seems there was another hold up now outside Raynes Park as their is a train at the platform in front of us. Not to mention one at New Malden. We are now being held at Raynes Park itself. May be there's a string of trains into Waterloo. The driver or guard did say we were being held outside Raynes Park for safety reasons so they have at leaf communicated to us.
It's odd because I can recall at will, many of the routes and moves should I want, I can work out my speeds to within 1 or 2 mph to achieve the perfect run, in fact I find going to Waterloo quite tedious and I really do need extra knowledge to keep me interested.
Thanks for that. I can only assume it was so soon that it hadn't reached any delay sections yet in Journey Check.The Raynes Park incident wasn't a fatality; it was yet another instance a van arguing with the Lower Downs Road bridge.
I assume the bridge is after Raynes Park.
Does the functionailty of DAS form part of one of the ETCS Levels?