People who know about the other ways of doing it.Who thought separating infrastructure from service providers was a good idea?
Railtrack didn’t do enough maintenance and were replaced because of that. We can be sure that there is more work going on, with some of it fitting less conveniently into the public’s schedules.I'd be interested to see stats to see if the incidence of engineering work on busy weekends (i.e. bank holiday weekends and all weekends June-Aug) has increased since the 90s.
Could unit maintenance be replanned such that routine maintenance is avoided on peak days (start of holiday, end of holiday etc) so more units are available?
First weekend in a long time mostly undisrupted by engineering though. Still loadings are solid today.
With GWR having issues as well with a signalling fault at St Budeaux last night it seems 1H84 went to Penzance as a 15 car train. Did this actually happen or was it just a Realtime Trains anomaly?
Look carefully at when people actually travel. One gets the feeling the railway is sitting waiting for the old demand patterns to re-emerge
Which of course would mean this Easter weekend would have higher demand than most other Easters which makes closing a major London terminal even more questionable!It may also be relevant that we have Ramadan, Passover and Easter all coinciding this year.
Very much agree with this. Whilst commuter traffic is now picking up, in the post-Covid world it’s far easier for most people who are commuting to switch to work from home on railway closure days, as we’ve seen during the strikes.With a railway more dependant on leisure i think a new approach is needed.
Its only being going on since the invention of the railways by now you'd think it would have worked it out
BR used to. They didnt scrap everything once it ended front line service
In the old days, railways used to keep spare stock precisely to handle peak demand.
Because in those days you could get away with keeping some ratty old coaches around the back of a depot at very little apparent cost and hooking them on to trains when you needed extra capacity.
For Wellingborough passengers travelling Northwards it indeed transferred them - to Kettering.On the East Midlands route, they brought in 360s, which transferred Wellingborough passengers and added more capacity at Bedford and Luton, which allowed the HSTs to be withdrawn.
'keeping ratty old coaches etc' was something Dr Beeching targeted years ago! The railway does keep stock for peak demand, witness for example the EMUs stabled at various points around London between the morning and evening peaks; Keeping stock for exceptional demand is another thing.
The four loco-hauled 'Cobbler' commuter sets were only used on that service M-F for obvious reasons. Use on that sort of trains at weekends was at marginal (mileage based) costs. There were many other examples. And they started their 'Footex' in fine condition, didn't always re-appear on Mondays in the same state...A large proportion of those mk1s used for footex services off season & in Summer for extras to the likes of Blackpool, Paignton, Skegness & Yarmouth were in a terrible state. Many using them in the 70s chose not to repeat experience.
Look carefully at when people actually travel. One gets the feeling the railway is sitting waiting for the old demand patterns to re-emerge
In B.R. days great effort was taken to outshop as many coaches as possible from carriage works before they start of the works holiday. This produced the maximum size fleet just when it was needed - at holiday times. Stock for high season dated trains.
I did suspect as much. There were chaotic scenes at Plymouth yesterday and I did fleetingly wonder if they had caved in to irate holiday makers having to wait an extra hour or so for the next train. Would have looked an interesting formation on the Albert Bridge for sure.Just an anomaly. Unit control obviously didn’t update the system.
I did suspect as much. There were chaotic scenes at Plymouth yesterday and I did fleetingly wonder if they had caved in to irate holiday makers having to wait an extra hour or so for the next train. Would have looked an interesting formation on the Albert Bridge for sure.

Indeed. This is the key problem. Massive peaks 1000-1200 and then again 1600-1800. This is just a weekend thing too, although any longer BH weekend will make it more worthwhile. If anything leisure travel can be more ‘peaky’ than weekday commuter travel.
Across the whole 4 days, loadings are probably more, although the Friday will probably be busier than most other days.
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
The same is true of travelling by car too at specific times or is that “putting the blame on motorists”?
Interestingly having had Oxford - Didcot fail it’s some cognitive dissonance for some to then start talking about “non-essential” engineering works! But we get threads on this every bank holiday weekend and warm summer, but there’s only so many hours in a week and weeks in a year.
I also think pent-up demand is a little overblown - we’ve had a year plus without restrictions.
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
Harsh as it may be, this might be part of the problem. If at specific times of the day the railway cannot meet the demand with the supply, then pricing should be adjusted.
I arrived today on a 755 - lovely journey, though Yarmouth is a better description than "Great" Yarmouth.Those arriving into Yarmouth during the 70s from the likes of Walsall & Newcastle left a lot to be desired.
Been saying this for years. Public holidays are the busiest days of the year for UK rail.
Do you have any evidence for that claim? https://www.networkrail.co.uk/running-the-railway/looking-after-the-railway/planned-works/ statesBeen saying this for years. Public holidays are the busiest days of the year for UK rail.
on average, around half the usual five million people travel by train each day during the Christmas period.
Been saying this for years. Public holidays are the busiest days of the year for UK rail.
If you make a certain sort of journey, then perhaps. However plenty of trains run around very empty. Meanwhile, the likes of the Edale ramblers will only turn out if the weather is okay.
I arrived today on a 755 - lovely journey, though Yarmouth is a better description than "Great" Yarmouth.
Chelmsford to Lowestoft, to Norwich, to Yarmouth, to Norwich, to Lowestoft, then Ipswich and back, with light loading away from the main Norwich services, but still got a table to myself on the 19:41 from Ipswich. Passengers don't like walking to get away from the crowds...
I also noted that there are more services on Saturday on many lines down here than weekdays, so not really stock sitting around at weekends, as often bandied around. Norwich Crown Point was quiet so the units must have been out and about.
As taxpayers, we subsidise the railways for the social good. That means that people on lower incomes should be able to visit their friends and relatives as well
Even during Wales & Borders day they realised they should cover a few services with a loco hauled eight carriage train when students start and finish term, yet this year they'll be lucky to get a two car service every two hours. The University has only been there since 1872.
It's not just two weekends a year though, it's every annual event, 20,000 plus sports event and many other tournaments most with plenty of notice to arrange extra services.
As TOC'S are standardising their fleets with very similar trains would it be too hard to pool resources by region and move them where it's required as they used to do?
Every region will have something on at a weekend requiring extra capacity most of the year. The festival organiser, one off sports events and local authorities realise not too hold too much at the same time so they can allocate resources, why is the railway always seemingly caught unaware or more likely bothered?
Been saying this for years. Public holidays are the busiest days of the year for UK rail.
Because quite often the organisers of these events don't bother to get in touch with the transport businesses, both rail and road.
Confusing cause and effect there. Of course fewer people travel by train then - because the railways make it so difficult that people have to resort to other modes. I had to drive a 300 mile round trip one Christmas Day so that a family member (a nurse) could get from a family gathering (the first Christmas she had had with us for several years) to take up her shift on Boxing Day. Another family member, who worked in the church and therefore was busy until late morning on Christmas Day, had to hire a car to get any time with us over Christmas.Do you have any evidence for that claim? https://www.networkrail.co.uk/running-the-railway/looking-after-the-railway/planned-works/ states "on average, around half the usual five million people travel by train each day during the Christmas period."
I’m not sure the data backs that up, although someone like @Bald Rick is probably best placed to answer a question like that. Bank holidays can be very peaky.