• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

NYMR news and updates.

Iskra

Established Member
Joined
11 Jun 2014
Messages
10,699
Location
West Riding
I had an excellent visit to the railway today for the Flying Scotsman. Parking was easy and we were able to enjoy the very quiet Black 5 hauled shuttle to Whitby comprising only 3 carriages, which were virtually empty, although this was very enjoyable. The Flying Scotsman services were a different story of course. Interestingly, The Flying Scotsman on load 8 was banked by the 9F out of Grosmont as far as Goathland which was a great experience. I thought the day was good value for money too. The friendliness and good humour of the volunteers added to the experience. I would say that as an enthusiast I found the Black 5 and 9F far more entertaining than the Flying Scotsman though…
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3334.jpeg
    IMG_3334.jpeg
    182.7 KB · Views: 57
  • IMG_3328.jpeg
    IMG_3328.jpeg
    644.1 KB · Views: 52
  • IMG_3342.jpeg
    IMG_3342.jpeg
    640.8 KB · Views: 54
  • IMG_3363.jpeg
    IMG_3363.jpeg
    635.3 KB · Views: 57
  • IMG_3364.jpeg
    IMG_3364.jpeg
    546.4 KB · Views: 58
  • IMG_3365.jpeg
    IMG_3365.jpeg
    402.3 KB · Views: 57
  • IMG_3384.jpeg
    IMG_3384.jpeg
    441.9 KB · Views: 53
  • IMG_3395.jpeg
    IMG_3395.jpeg
    442.8 KB · Views: 51
  • IMG_3398.jpeg
    IMG_3398.jpeg
    475.2 KB · Views: 54
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Trainlog

Member
Joined
16 Aug 2022
Messages
568
Location
Maidstone
I had an excellent visit to the railway today for the Flying Scotsman. Parking was easy and we were able to enjoy the very quiet Black 5 hauled shuttle to Whitby comprising only 3 carriages, which were virtually empty, although this was very enjoyable. The Flying Scotsman services were a different story of course. Interestingly, The Flying Scotsman on load 8 was banked by the 9F out of Grosmont as far as Goathland which was a great experience. I thought the day was good value for money too. The friendliness and good humour of the volunteers added to the experience. I would say that as an enthusiast I found the Black 5 and 9F far more entertaining than the Flying Scotsman though…
Firstly, excellent photos, I too had a look at the footplate of the 9f when I went there back in September.

Whilst yes, the virtually empty part for a heritage railway isn't ideal, however, it is not great to deal with toddlers screaming or loud conversations in an open Mk1, so that does sound good that you basically had the train to yourself. I too was surprised as to how few coaches are on that shuttle, but its definitely a highlight of visiting the NYMR.

I also agree, the NYMR is easily one of the friendliest railways I have visited around the UK, as for the locos part, I also can get behind that, though Scotsman isn't necessarily a bad loco, it's just unfortunately the only Gresley A3 we have left so it's hard to appreciate it with a crowd of 20 people blocking your view.
Possibly. But given that the train will run to Grosmont anyway, people will still drive there to see it.

I suspect that a lot of the issue is, as usual, tightwad entitled car drivers not wanting to pay to use the very large National Park car park adjacent to the station, but instead parking on the main road: the road is always jammed with parked cars even when there are lots of spaces in the car park.
I believe the capacity of that car park is 100 cars, with a further 40 spaces in the station car park. At 4 people per car (almost certainly an over-estimate), that's 580 people. O believe the Flying Scotsman services run at 8 carriages. Assuming 7 TSOs and a brake, that's 480 seats per working. With two round trip loads (one returning, one departing), that implies a shortfall of 100 parking spaces if everyone came by car. And then there are staff & volunteers, plus on some days those associated with the diner.

I'm sure there are some tightwads who insist on street parking, but I very much doubt that's the whole story.
Granted, most will drive to the NYMR anyway, but it doesn't help how bad the Esk Valley service is. Granted, if you plan correctly and make the most of it such as going round the town of Whitby until the train turns up. Although it's fair to say the train around 7PM-ish to Middlesbrough on a Saturday was not a fun experience with a 2-car train.

(different note: it's nice that most restaurants/takeaways, including the Domino's at Whitby, have at least somewhere to sit down and eat in)

Anyway, back to the main point, most enthusiasts/general public will most likely drive there, and if it includes the price of expensive parking, such as at the National trust, then people will naturally try and park somewhere cheaper, albeit in this case, rather informally and blocking roads.

If the Esk valley had some better services, perhaps this might have been reduced slightly?
 

Iskra

Established Member
Joined
11 Jun 2014
Messages
10,699
Location
West Riding
Firstly, excellent photos, I too had a look at the footplate of the 9f when I went there back in September.

Whilst yes, the virtually empty part for a heritage railway isn't ideal, however, it is not great to deal with toddlers screaming or loud conversations in an open Mk1, so that does sound good that you basically had the train to yourself. I too was surprised as to how few coaches are on that shuttle, but its definitely a highlight of visiting the NYMR.

I also agree, the NYMR is easily one of the friendliest railways I have visited around the UK, as for the locos part, I also can get behind that, though Scotsman isn't necessarily a bad loco, it's just unfortunately the only Gresley A3 we have left so it's hard to appreciate it with a crowd of 20 people blocking your view.

Thanks, my video footage from the day is out now:

 

HertiageFan

Member
Joined
30 Jul 2025
Messages
356
Location
Wakefield
Anyone know what’s running on today’s Santa express?

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Also when does 44806’s boiler ticket expire
 

kje7812

Member
Joined
1 May 2018
Messages
652
Location
Kidderminster
Anyone know what’s running on today’s Santa express?

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Also when does 44806’s boiler ticket expire
44806 was overhauled in 2023. So I believe 2033 for the '10 years', though mainline is a max of 7 I'm fairly sure.
 

Ryry

Member
Joined
17 Feb 2019
Messages
145
Seen pictures on Flickr / Facebook the 1 of the dmu has now left nymr
 

Iskra

Established Member
Joined
11 Jun 2014
Messages
10,699
Location
West Riding
The railway has also cancelled a good chunk of its post-christmas deep winter services due to essential winter maintenance being needed on a bridge.
 

merry

Member
Joined
19 Oct 2011
Messages
177
Sad to hear, but also necessary for many lines to do serious maintenance on their heritage infrastructure in the "off" season.
 

Belperpete

Established Member
Joined
17 Aug 2018
Messages
3,642
Sad to hear, but also necessary for many lines to do serious maintenance on their heritage infrastructure in the "off" season.
Agreed, but such work is usually programmed well in advance. Cancelling advertised services is not usual.
 

kje7812

Member
Joined
1 May 2018
Messages
652
Location
Kidderminster
Agreed, but such work is usually programmed well in advance. Cancelling advertised services is not usual.
It seems the condition of the bridge is worse than previously thought.
For reference it's Bridge 42 which is the bridge over the river Esk just to the immediate south of Grosmont station.
 

Egton

Member
Joined
10 Dec 2023
Messages
36
Location
Wakefield
Seen pictures on Flickr / Facebook the 1 of the dmu has now left nymr
Considered beyond economic repair - sold for glamping ? - engines etc to be removed. The other 3 car unit is being overhauled / restored - one coach at a time - by an external contractor.
 

HertiageFan

Member
Joined
30 Jul 2025
Messages
356
Location
Wakefield
The NER (North Eastern Railway) autocar will be replaced by a steam locomotive top and tailed with a diesel locomotive, according to the website
Due to a mechanical issue with the NER railcar, it will no longer be operating on the dates. A steam locomotive and diesel locomotive shuttle will run instead.
Yesterday, 37688 failed while assisting 29 and 31128 rescued it

I was told by a friend
 
Last edited:

Egton

Member
Joined
10 Dec 2023
Messages
36
Location
Wakefield
NER Autocar and trailer were back in use this last weekend. 44806 / 37-688 / 47-077 /29 have now all returned to Grosmont MPD
 

kevinbev

Member
Joined
21 Feb 2018
Messages
15
Looking at the calendar for the Pullman services which is now available to book, that starts on Tues 24th March. No services on the Thursday and Friday as per 2025.
 

Egton

Member
Joined
10 Dec 2023
Messages
36
Location
Wakefield
It seems the condition of the bridge is worse than previously thought.
For reference it's Bridge 42 which is the bridge over the river Esk just to the immediate south of Grosmont station.
An appeal has now been launched for donations towards repairs - likely that no services will operate north of Goathland to Grosmont or Whitby in 2026 until repairs are completed. -
 

Belperpete

Established Member
Joined
17 Aug 2018
Messages
3,642
An appeal has now been launched for donations towards repairs - likely that no services will operate north of Goathland to Grosmont or Whitby in 2026 until repairs are completed. -
The Bridge 42 appeal page is very lite on detail, no information about how long the work will take or how much it is going to cost. But they are still saying:
Our standard services will start again in March.
It is also not clear exactly where bridge 42 is - it is between Grosmont MPD and Grosmont station. Closure of the bridge would cut Grosmont station (and its connection to the Whitby line) from the rest of the line between Pickering and Grosmont MPD.
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
32,916
Location
Fenny Stratford
It is also not clear exactly where bridge 42 is - it is between Grosmont MPD and Grosmont station. Closure of the bridge would cut Grosmont station (and its connection to the Whitby line) from the rest of the line between Pickering and Grosmont MPD.
There is a picture of the bridge on your link! It is the one immediately south of grosmont station.
 

Twingo37175

Member
Joined
24 Mar 2019
Messages
246
The Bridge 42 appeal page is very lite on detail, no information about how long the work will take or how much it is going to cost. But they are still saying:

It is also not clear exactly where bridge 42 is - it is between Grosmont MPD and Grosmont station. Closure of the bridge would cut Grosmont station (and its connection to the Whitby line) from the rest of the line between Pickering and Grosmont MPD.
Bridge 42 is just outside of Grosmont station as I understand it. So yes, nothing between the MPD and the station, or onwards to Whitby. I believe they may have had an interim way of working prior to Christmas (not certain), maybe single train over it.
 

Belperpete

Established Member
Joined
17 Aug 2018
Messages
3,642
There is a picture of the bridge on your link!
Indeed there is. There are actually two pictures, neither much help in locating the position of the bridge if you are not intimate with the area. In one of the pictures, the bridge is hardly visible! Surely the railway must have a better picture than that?

Confusingly, the text on the page says:
Bridge 42 is the vital link between Whitby and Grosmont, our depot, and the start of the stunning journey towards Goathland and Pickering.
For most people, that would imply the bridge is between Whitby station, and Grosmont station and depot, ie north of the station. Alternatively it can be read as it being between Grosmont depot, and the rest of the line towards Goathland and Pickering, i.e. south of the depot, where there is another bridge over the Mursk Esk (the railway has two bridges over the Mursk Esk, one north and one south of the depot). Very confusing.

In fact, as you say, the bridge is south of Grosmont station, between Grosmont station and Grosmont depot (and the rest of the line towards Goathland).

The whole page gives the impression of being cobbled together in a bit of a hurry. No information on exactly what the problem is, how long it will take to rectify, how much it will cost, when the work will start or the impact on 2026 services. Apart from the nice side-on picture of the bridge, the rest of the page is pretty useless. Are we being asked to contribute to something that is going to cost thousands, millions or billions? Is the work going to take weeks, months or years?

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

The bridge is over the Mursk Esk.
Yes, but the railway has at least two bridges over the Mursk Esk!
 

D6130

Established Member
Joined
12 Jan 2021
Messages
9,073
Location
West Yorkshire/Tuscany
Indeed there is. There are actually two pictures, neither much help in locating the position of the bridge if you are not intimate with the area. In one of the pictures, the bridge is hardly visible! Surely the railway must have a better picture than that?

Confusingly, the text on the page says:

For most people, that would imply the bridge is between Whitby station, and Grosmont station and depot, ie north of the station. Alternatively it can be read as it being between Grosmont depot, and the rest of the line towards Goathland and Pickering, i.e. south of the depot, where there is another bridge over the Mursk Esk (the railway has two bridges over the Mursk Esk, one north and one south of the depot). Very confusing.

In fact, as you say, the bridge is south of Grosmont station, between Grosmont station and Grosmont depot (and the rest of the line towards Goathland).

The whole page gives the impression of being cobbled together in a bit of a hurry. No information on exactly what the problem is, how long it will take to rectify, how much it will cost, when the work will start or the impact on 2026 services. Apart from the nice side-on picture of the bridge, the rest of the page is pretty useless. Are we being asked to contribute to something that is going to cost thousands, millions or billions? Is the work going to take weeks, months or years?

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==


Yes, but the railway has at least two bridges over the Mursk Esk!
A pedant writes: The name of the river is the Murk Esk, not the Mursk Esk. ;)
 

Swimbar

Member
Joined
31 Jan 2018
Messages
436
Location
Wetherby
Indeed there is. There are actually two pictures, neither much help in locating the position of the bridge if you are not intimate with the area. In one of the pictures, the bridge is hardly visible! Surely the railway must have a better picture than that?

The whole page gives the impression of being cobbled together in a bit of a hurry. No information on exactly what the problem is, how long it will take to rectify, how much it will cost, when the work will start or the impact on 2026 services. Apart from the nice side-on picture of the bridge, the rest of the page is pretty useless. Are we being asked to contribute to something that is going to cost thousands, millions or billions? Is the work going to take weeks, months or years?

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==


Yes, but the railway has at least two bridges over the Mursk Esk!
Why am I not surprised as yet again you take every opportunity to criticise NYMR. There is a picture of the bridge with Repton passing over it, on their Website, in support the appeal.
 

Belperpete

Established Member
Joined
17 Aug 2018
Messages
3,642
Why am I not surprised as yet again you take every opportunity to criticise NYMR. There is a picture of the bridge with Repton passing over it, on their Website, in support the appeal.
No useful information whatsoever, and what information there is, is misleading and confusing. Don't you think that deserves criticism?

But at least there is a pretty picture of a bridge.
 

Notabene

Member
Joined
22 Oct 2023
Messages
68
Location
Selby
On a model railway layout it's often seen as unprototypical to put a level crossing next to a bridge and then a tunnel. But at Grosmont all three exist immediately south of the platforms. And not just one tunnel.
Quite a special place.

I would imagine no Whitby trains in 2026 unless the bridge can be propped. It looks a big job that will take time.
 

Ploughman

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2010
Messages
3,103
Location
Near where the 3 ridings meet
Just to emphasise, There is no way to run a train between Grosmont tunnel and Grosmont Station. The bridge is between these places.

A Track slew has taken place South of the Tunnel which enables Locos or vehicles trapped in the MPD to be released for move to Newbridge, but as before, no passage exists over the bridge.

If trains are to be reinstated between Goathland and Pickering then a problem exists at Goathland due to no run round allowed at Goathland due to the gradient. Top and Tail working may need to be used.
 

D Mylchreest

Member
Joined
10 Dec 2022
Messages
103
Location
London
Indeed there is. There are actually two pictures, neither much help in locating the position of the bridge if you are not intimate with the area. In one of the pictures, the bridge is hardly visible! Surely the railway must have a better picture than that?

Confusingly, the text on the page says:

For most people, that would imply the bridge is between Whitby station, and Grosmont station and depot, ie north of the station. Alternatively it can be read as it being between Grosmont depot, and the rest of the line towards Goathland and Pickering, i.e. south of the depot, where there is another bridge over the Mursk Esk (the railway has two bridges over the Mursk Esk, one north and one south of the depot). Very confusing.

In fact, as you say, the bridge is south of Grosmont station, between Grosmont station and Grosmont depot (and the rest of the line towards Goathland).

The whole page gives the impression of being cobbled together in a bit of a hurry. No information on exactly what the problem is, how long it will take to rectify, how much it will cost, when the work will start or the impact on 2026 services. Apart from the nice side-on picture of the bridge, the rest of the page is pretty useless. Are we being asked to contribute to something that is going to cost thousands, millions or billions? Is the work going to take weeks, months or years?

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==


Yes, but the railway has at least two bridges over the Mursk Esk!
There are two bridges, one is for the current railway the other is a pedestrian bridge originally built (I think) by Stephenson for the tramway
 

Top