tbtc
Veteran Member
For some really daft reason the politicans in this country only ever to consider electrifing lines on an individual basis, they never seem to consider the Rail network in totality. What this means is that you have many line radiating from London that are electrified but very few cross country routes, which means that almost all the frieght in this country is desiel hauled. Scotland seems to have the right idea.
The best example of that is that the only way of getting an electric train from Leeds to Manchester is either to go up to Edinburgh/ Carstairs or down to the North London Line - none of the lines in between allow an electric link from the ECML to the WCML
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
I note that you make mention of the Caldervale route going via Brighouse to Leeds, which is a direct route these days. But by going through Brighouse, you will cut out Bradford Interchange. Was that to prevent the need for reversal at Bradford? Surely it would also be useful also to electrify the line from Milner Royd junction through Dryclough junction, carrying on via Halifax to Bradford.
There is much in the way of case argument about the relative rights and benefits to either the west or to the east sides of the Pennines, when discussing North-South routes, but there is the matter of cross-Pennine electrification is one that seems logical to people on both sides of the Pennines, but has been very late in coming even to the discussion stage.
Sorry, I don't think I explained myself very well.
The way I see it is this:
The main Transpennine route from Leeds to Manchester has a lot of trains running over it, but it isn't a great case for electrification because these trains run on to Hull/ Scarborough/ Middlesbrough at the eastern end (so you'd need to either wire these lines up/ cut links if you want electrification to free up a lot of DMUs).
However, the Caldervale line could potentially sustain a fifteen minute service from Leeds to Manchester. What you'd need to do is
1. Divert the (York) - Leeds - Bradford - Hebden Bridge - Burnley - Blackburn - Preston - Blackpool service to run via Brighouse (meaning that the current "via Brighouse" service would run via Bradford instead).
2. Chop the "Grand Tour" so that the Wakefield - Huddersfield - Brighouse - Bradford - Leeds (Selby) service becomes Wakefield - Huddersfield - Brighouse - Bradford (plus a separate Leeds - Selby service)
3. Replace this with an hourly Leeds - Bradford replacement
4. You now have four trains an hour from Leeds to Bradford (along the Caldervale line), three trains an hour from Bradford to Rochdale and four trains an hour from Rochdale to Manchester. None of this has needed a massive increase in units.
5. The next step is to electrify Leeds - Bradford - Halifax - Hebden Bridge - Rochdale - Manchester and give it a fifteen minute DMU service (say two an hour doing the "local" Yorkshire stations (Bramley/ Pudsey) and the other two trains doing the "local" Lancashire stations (Castleton/ Moston etc)
6. You've then freed up a dozen DMUs to be used elsewhere at the cost of around fifty miles of track
7. There's then potential for EMUs to run from Leeds/Bradford/Rochdale to Bolton/ Blackpool/ Liverpool etc (balancing up the EMUs at Victoria)
8. You've not had to make many significant cuts. The only significant "loss" would be Bradford - East Lancashire/Blackpool (though this could be compensated by running direct services through to Blackpool via Bolton). Most of the lost other links are more there for operational convenience (nobody uses the train to travel from Selby to Wakefield via Brighouse, for example!)