• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Northern Unit Refurbishments and depot allocations.

507021

Established Member
Joined
19 Feb 2015
Messages
4,759
Location
Chester
Not the thinly padded ironing board one?

Unfortunately so, going off the comments I heard about it when I sampled them at the roadshow at Lime Street last year.

Really, really poor if this turns out to be true.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
113,793
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Unfortunately so, going off the comments I heard about it when I sampled them at the roadshow at Lime Street last year.

Really, really poor if this turns out to be true.

Wasn't it the case that they had had positive comments about both the heavily padded one and the extra legroom from the ironing board, thus perhaps going for a hybrid of the ironing board back plus a contoured base like ScotRail have gone for for the Hitachi EMUs? Said base makes them vastly more comfortable than the flat base used by Southern (I tried both at the roadshow in Edinburgh some time ago).

I'm still disappointed by the absence of the Grammer high-back winged seat.
 

507021

Established Member
Joined
19 Feb 2015
Messages
4,759
Location
Chester
Wasn't it the case that they had had positive comments about both the heavily padded one and the extra legroom from the ironing board, thus perhaps going for a hybrid of the ironing board back plus a contoured base like ScotRail have gone for for the Hitachi EMUs? Said base makes them vastly more comfortable than the flat base used by Southern (I tried both at the roadshow in Edinburgh some time ago).

I guess that would be alright, because the one thing I will give the ironing board seats credit for is the legroom, but that's where it stops for me. If that style seat with more padding and better back support was chosen, then it wouldn't be the end of the world I guess. However above all that, at least there's actually brand new trains on the way for the North, and way more than the 120 powered carriages the ITT specified was the minimum amount required.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
44,414
Location
Yorks
I guess that would be alright, because the one thing I will give the ironing board seats credit for is the legroom, but that's where it stops for me. If that style seat with more padding and better back support was chosen, then it wouldn't be the end of the world I guess. However above all that, at least there's actually brand new trains on the way for the North, and way more than the 120 powered carriages the ITT specified was the minimum amount required.

Well this is true. Although it has to be said that some will be replacing 144's which actually have quite pleasent seats IMO (albeit too close together).
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
113,793
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
To be fair the legroom on the Southern ones with ironing boards is also because the layout is a very low density one - rather than cramming in an extra row per 350/1 they just crammed in a side-facing seat instead.
 

superkev

Established Member
Joined
1 Mar 2015
Messages
2,870
Location
west yorkshire
Wasn't it the case that they had had positive comments about both the heavily padded one and the extra legroom from the ironing board, thus perhaps going for a hybrid of the ironing board back plus a contoured base like ScotRail have gone for for the Hitachi EMUs? Said base makes them vastly more comfortable than the flat base used by Southern (I tried both at the roadshow in Edinburgh some time ago).

I'm still disappointed by the absence of the Grammer high-back winged seat.
I wonder if Northern senior management read this forum.
D
 

TEW

Established Member
Joined
16 May 2008
Messages
6,228
To be fair the legroom on the Southern ones with ironing boards is also because the layout is a very low density one - rather than cramming in an extra row per 350/1 they just crammed in a side-facing seat instead.

Whereas the ironing boards on the 700s have pretty poor legroom as the seats have been crammed in.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
113,793
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Whereas the ironing boards on the 700s have pretty poor legroom as the seats have been crammed in.

Indeed, but would be much worse if a different, thicker type of seat had been used. (FWIW they seem about the same as the middle section on a 350/1 to me, albeit narrower).
 

northwichcat

Veteran Member
Joined
23 Jan 2009
Messages
32,692
Location
Northwich
Just received my modern railways mag and IW reports that northern have picked the seat least liked by passengers in the recent trial. Presumably the cheapest.
K

Other reports have suggested the seat with the most padding won the public vote and the ironing board lost but they are going for the other option with a little bit of extra padding so there's more leg room than if they had gone for the most popular option.
 

northwichcat

Veteran Member
Joined
23 Jan 2009
Messages
32,692
Location
Northwich
Whereas the ironing boards on the 700s have pretty poor legroom as the seats have been crammed in.

The seating capacities of the new trains were agreed before the type of seating was chosen so they'll have pretty much the same number of seats as the standard class only 170s have.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
44,414
Location
Yorks
Indeed, but would be much worse if a different, thicker type of seat had been used. (FWIW they seem about the same as the middle section on a 350/1 to me, albeit narrower).

Or perhaps the ironing board style seats made them feel that they could cram more in than would otherwise have been the case.
 

Andyh82

Established Member
Joined
19 May 2014
Messages
4,607
The new trains will be running the Northern Connect routes so hopefully they will be suitable for fairly long distance journeys like Manchester Airport to Bradford.

I wish they'd spend money now instead of having to spend twice, just look at First Transpennine Express, if they'd spent more on more carriages then they wouldn't have to replace the fleet again now.
 

Mordac

Established Member
Joined
5 Mar 2016
Messages
2,386
Location
Birmingham
The new trains will be running the Northern Connect routes so hopefully they will be suitable for fairly long distance journeys like Manchester Airport to Bradford.

I wish they'd spend money now instead of having to spend twice, just look at First Transpennine Express, if they'd spent more on more carriages then they wouldn't have to replace the fleet again now.

To be fair, TPE was stopped from doing so by the SRA, they actually wanted to buy more trains.
 

TC60054

Member
Joined
3 Mar 2016
Messages
595
Location
Doncaster
I believe the original TPE order was almost halved from 300 carriages to the 153 that they actually recieved.
 

northwichcat

Veteran Member
Joined
23 Jan 2009
Messages
32,692
Location
Northwich
I believe the original TPE order was almost halved from 300 carriages to the 153 that they actually recieved.

I believe the number was actually 174 (58 units) plus 18 x 170 (9 units).

I thought it was 56 x 3 car with the option for more centre cars. It was also claimed SRA wanted to cutback to 45 x 3 car but when Siemens told them an order of <150 carriages would incur a higher price per carriage, they went with 153 and decided to transfer Manchester Airport to Blackpool to TPE - which was supposed to be staying with Northern and getting 158s once the 175s properly transferred to W&B.

Arriva's bid had proposed something similar to the 222s in 4 car formations and had included a proposal for them to run Blackpool to Manchester to Cleethorpes services, so would have required a lot more carriages in total. We never heard what Connex proposed but reportedly they would have won had First/Kelios not revised their original, so possibly Connex had what would have been the least attractive bid for passengers.
 

ben2012

Member
Joined
1 Oct 2012
Messages
40
Location
Pontefract, West Yorkshire
I thought it was 56 x 3 car with the option for more centre cars. It was also claimed SRA wanted to cutback to 45 x 3 car but when Siemens told them an order of <150 carriages would incur a higher price per carriage, they went with 153 and decided to transfer Manchester Airport to Blackpool to TPE - which was supposed to be staying with Northern and getting 158s once the 175s properly transferred to W&B.

Arriva's bid had proposed something similar to the 222s in 4 car formations and had included a proposal for them to run Blackpool to Manchester to Cleethorpes services, so would have required a lot more carriages in total. We never heard what Connex proposed but reportedly they would have won had First/Kelios not revised their original, so possibly Connex had what would have been the least attractive bid for passengers.

As any one for a pic of arrivas proposal
 

TC60054

Member
Joined
3 Mar 2016
Messages
595
Location
Doncaster
I thought it was 56 x 3 car with the option for more centre cars. It was also claimed SRA wanted to cutback to 45 x 3 car but when Siemens told them an order of <150 carriages would incur a higher price per carriage, they went with 153 and decided to transfer Manchester Airport to Blackpool to TPE - which was supposed to be staying with Northern and getting 158s once the 175s properly transferred to W&B.

Arriva's bid had proposed something similar to the 222s in 4 car formations and had included a proposal for them to run Blackpool to Manchester to Cleethorpes services, so would have required a lot more carriages in total. We never heard what Connex proposed but reportedly they would have won had First/Kelios not revised their original, so possibly Connex had what would have been the least attractive bid for passengers.

I heard first 60x5 car, reduced to 60x3 car, then to 56x3 car with the option for centre carriages, then further reduced to 51x3 car, all this done by the DafT, but I could be wrong.
 

northwichcat

Veteran Member
Joined
23 Jan 2009
Messages
32,692
Location
Northwich
I heard first 60x5 car, reduced to 60x3 car, then to 56x3 car with the option for centre carriages, then further reduced to 51x3 car, all this done by the DafT, but I could be wrong.

Technically it was by the SRA before they were abolished.
 

Andyh82

Established Member
Joined
19 May 2014
Messages
4,607
Give it a few years I can see a similar situation on Northern, as the new 2 car trains fill up. No extra carriages are authorised and then the model is discontinued meaning they are forever 2 cars.

Regarding the seats, as the new trains will be directly replacing 158s, you would hope they have a similar level of comfort to those or else it could all end up in disappointment and bad press. At the other end of the fleet, the pacers will be replaced by 150s which will probably also lead to disappointment!
 

northwichcat

Veteran Member
Joined
23 Jan 2009
Messages
32,692
Location
Northwich
Give it a few years I can see a similar situation on Northern, as the new 2 car trains fill up. No extra carriages are authorised and then the model is discontinued meaning they are forever 2 cars.

Northern have written in to the franchise agreement that they have to acquire an additional 36 x 100mph capable diesel powered carriages with air conditioning post-2019 but the way it's worded suggests if cascaded stock is available which fits that description e.g. Anglia 170s then those should be acquired opposed to more 195s. It also is based on predicted growth and doesn't seem to include the possibly for say 60 carriages if growth is higher than predicted.
 

WatcherZero

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2010
Messages
10,272
Its emerging that Transport for The North do have a little leeway to make adjustments to the subsidy profile to make alterations to services/increase capacity.
 

xotGD

Established Member
Joined
4 Feb 2017
Messages
7,900
Give it a few years I can see a similar situation on Northern, as the new 2 car trains fill up. No extra carriages are authorised and then the model is discontinued meaning they are forever 2 cars.

Regarding the seats, as the new trains will be directly replacing 158s, you would hope they have a similar level of comfort to those or else it could all end up in disappointment and bad press. At the other end of the fleet, the pacers will be replaced by 150s which will probably also lead to disappointment!

Reform the 150s into 3-car sets with 2+2 seating with fewer airline seats and people will be happy. (Could you use a 153 as a centre car in a 150???)
 

61653 HTAFC

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Dec 2012
Messages
19,372
Location
Yorkshire
Reform the 150s into 3-car sets with 2+2 seating with fewer airline seats and people will be happy. (Could you use a 153 as a centre car in a 150???)

One of the big lessons about 3+2 seating is the approach used on the 333s. All seats on the 3 side are in bays, with airline seats only on the 2 side. If this approach is taken with the 150s I'd have no issue with 3+2 seating being used- after all we need all the capacity we can get...

You could use a 153 as a centre car in a 150, but as the vehicles are different lengths it would make life awkward for stopping positions on platforms, and it would look ridiculous. The only future I can see for 153s is as 2 or 3-car 155s. Hybrid sets also create issues with route availability: there are places where 153/5s are passed but 150s aren't, and vice-versa.
 

northwichcat

Veteran Member
Joined
23 Jan 2009
Messages
32,692
Location
Northwich
Reform the 150s into 3-car sets with 2+2 seating with fewer airline seats and people will be happy. (Could you use a 153 as a centre car in a 150???)

The Northern franchise agreement indicates some 3 car sets are coming from GWR and they will reform some 2 car sets in to 3 car ones. However, the seating capacity figures indicate the 150s will all retain 3+2 seating.

There won't be enough carriages to reform all the 150s in to 3 car and if they were all reformed it would cause issues on some lines e.g. Oxford Rd to Lime Street stoppers will need to be 4 car 150s at peak times - 6 cars would be too long for many platforms and 3 cars with 2+2 seating would be a significant reduction in the number of seats on peak time services.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
44,414
Location
Yorks
One of the big lessons about 3+2 seating is the approach used on the 333s. All seats on the 3 side are in bays, with airline seats only on the 2 side. If this approach is taken with the 150s I'd have no issue with 3+2 seating being used- after all we need all the capacity we can get...

You could use a 153 as a centre car in a 150, but as the vehicles are different lengths it would make life awkward for stopping positions on platforms, and it would look ridiculous. The only future I can see for 153s is as 2 or 3-car 155s. Hybrid sets also create issues with route availability: there are places where 153/5s are passed but 150s aren't, and vice-versa.

I'd rather have a seat in a ridiculous looking train than have to stand in an immaculately styled one.
 

northwichcat

Veteran Member
Joined
23 Jan 2009
Messages
32,692
Location
Northwich
I know this is off topic but what's happening with he set 158/159 fleets arriva said they needed more

More trains or more work?

There's 8 more arriving from Scotrail next year.

There's also been talk of the 158s getting new seats. The 'refurbished' ones also haven't had their lighting changed to LED lighting and I think there's a couple of other modifications still to do.
 

superkev

Established Member
Joined
1 Mar 2015
Messages
2,870
Location
west yorkshire
Almost a year into the franchise and I can't see much change with just 3 dmu units partially done. Not sure about emu's.
K
 

Top