Surely having an invalid railcard is the same as having none
Arguably an invalid railcard shows intention to deceive.
Surely having an invalid railcard is the same as having none
Arguably an invalid railcard shows intention to deceive.
Hmm... So do you reckon if I can produce the original documents for the new railcard (which was received three months before this incident and is still valid to this day), plus my explaination of events will be suitable to avoid them coming down hard on this matter?
Also, how long does it take for them to respond to the letter I sent them explaining what went down? Is there any way to know that they got my letter?
It might help, however the terms of the Railcard are quite clear that you need to carry them with you when using discounted tickets, so they also have the option not to take that into account.
Did you send it using Recorded Delivery? This is always the recommended method as this can be used as proof if needed in the future.
"Penalty Fares do not apply when travelling from Mauldeth Road station"
http://www.nationalrail.co.uk/stations/mau/details.html
Would that work in my favour/dissuade them from taking it to court?
No, I mean teaching all passengers how to read a timetable and destination screen, listen to announcements, what size bag they can pack and where it needs to be stored, where they need to go to buy a ticket, why a random number on a post-it will not substitute for a ticket, why it is not the railways fault they turned up too late to buy a ticket, and a special module (for extra credits) in recognising diffrent types of staff, so they know who to ask what question to.
