• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

New Overground line names progress?

Status
Not open for further replies.

renegademaster

Established Member
Joined
22 Jun 2023
Messages
2,211
Location
Croydon
After the flurry of initial publicity , barely any thing has seemed to have been updated. The official maps don't feature the new line names, nor do the disruption descriptions on the tfl website. I haven't seen much at the stations either
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

signed

Established Member
Joined
13 May 2024
Messages
2,372
Location
ROI
From what I can remember, they are supposed to enter service around October.

The official mention is end of 2024


As part of a new project to make travel on the London Overground simpler and easier for customers, we’re naming each of the six lines. We aim to make the changes by the end of 2024.

Londonist mentions August


The changes to the tube map and signage will be 'live' from August 2024.
 

DelW

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2015
Messages
5,949
After the flurry of initial publicity , barely any thing has seemed to have been updated. The official maps don't feature the new line names, nor do the disruption descriptions on the tfl website. I haven't seen much at the stations either
I've recently caught up with last Tuesday's "Secrets of the London Underground", which includes an interview with the owner of a firm which makes vitreous enamel signs for stations. IIRC part of their current workload is getting designs agreed for signage incorporating the new names, with actual production beginning later this year.
 

Dstock7080

Established Member
Joined
17 Feb 2010
Messages
3,513
Location
West London
New Line branded signs are starting to appear around the network, discreetly covered with vinyl in the current style
 

Basil Jet

On Moderation
Joined
23 Apr 2022
Messages
1,090
Location
London
New Line branded signs are starting to appear around the network, discreetly covered with vinyl in the current style
... which makes me wonder how vinyl meets the fire requirements which caused vitreous enamel to be used in the first place.
 

bicbasher

Established Member
Joined
14 May 2010
Messages
1,835
Location
London
I'm still waiting to see the new signs with vinyl covers at Forest Hill. I've seen them on the NLL (Mildmay) however.
 

AlbertBeale

Established Member
Joined
16 Jun 2019
Messages
3,188
Location
London
I really wish they didn’t give the lines those names…

Agreed - a silly waste of money. Especially given that the existing (mostly informal) names used in practice on some of the lines are well-known and well-used - ie West London Line, Goblin, etc.
 

Wolfie

Established Member
Joined
17 Aug 2010
Messages
7,395
After the flurry of initial publicity , barely any thing has seemed to have been updated. The official maps don't feature the new line names, nor do the disruption descriptions on the tfl website. I haven't seen much at the stations either
Regular announcements at stations, and also posters, that the names are being introduced "later this year".

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

... which makes me wonder how vinyl meets the fire requirements which caused vitreous enamel to be used in the first place.
Only really an issue on the former East London line stations.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

I wish Crossrail was called Crossrail.
That one was down to one unkempt blond bloke.
 

Acton1991

Member
Joined
20 Jan 2019
Messages
389
All the signage is there on the NLL by me - it’s just been vinyl’d over ready to be removed.

There’s even some new flower pots that have appeared slightly too early at South Acton :D
 

Attachments

  • 6192637d-5c11-432c-9bfd-e9a9ce35dadc.jpeg
    6192637d-5c11-432c-9bfd-e9a9ce35dadc.jpeg
    841.9 KB · Views: 325

Class15

Established Member
Joined
30 Dec 2021
Messages
4,102
Location
North London or Mildmay line
I had hoped, when I saw the thread title, that these line names were forgotten by TfL and now weren’t going to be used!

I agree with everyone on here, the new line names are really bad. I’m not going to be calling my local line the Mildmay Line and I don’t think many people are going to be either.
 

Recessio

Established Member
Joined
4 Aug 2019
Messages
1,494
Location
London

Senex

Established Member
Joined
1 Apr 2014
Messages
2,956
Location
York
Agreed - a silly waste of money. Especially given that the existing (mostly informal) names used in practice on some of the lines are well-known and well-used - ie West London Line, Goblin, etc.
It all started to go wrong when they substituted "Jubilee Line" for the perfectly good working name of "Fleet Line".
 

Wolfie

Established Member
Joined
17 Aug 2010
Messages
7,395
It all started to go wrong when they substituted "Jubilee Line" for the perfectly good working name of "Fleet Line".
That may have had a quiet a lot to do with the final Jubilee line route being quite different to the original plans which ran under Fleet St to the City of London.
 

AlbertBeale

Established Member
Joined
16 Jun 2019
Messages
3,188
Location
London
It all started to go wrong when they substituted "Jubilee Line" for the perfectly good working name of "Fleet Line".

Indeed!!

That may have had a quiet a lot to do with the final Jubilee line route being quite different to the original plans which ran under Fleet St to the City of London.

That's not the reason. Firstly, the initial portion did end up pointing towards Fleet Street, terminating at Charing Cross (with continuation/over-run tunnels under Strand ... almost to Fleet Street in fact); when they subsequently extended it east, they abandoned the part from Green Park to Charing Cross and onwards, and diverted it after Green Park to where it runs now. Secondly, even if the change of onwards route had been known ahead of the initial opening, the plan to call it the Fleet Line anyway wasn't abandoned. Almost right up to the opening, the publicity still referred to the Fleet Line; and the embossed enamel line interchange signs, on existing lines the new line interchanged with, were all made with the name "Fleet Line" for the new line. But at the last minute, the then powers-that-be in the GLC, in a fit of royalist sycophancy, changed the name from Fleet to Jubilee. Stickers had to be put on lots of the signs that were already in place in parts of the network, changing "Fleet" to "Jubilee". They kept the same line colour, but started calling it silver instead of grey!

(Campaigners from a group called MA'AM - Movement Against A Monarchy - spent the first day or so after the opening doing reverse stickering on the line diagrams in the trains themselves, covering "Jubilee" with a sign saying "Fleet Line - don't Jubilee've it!")
 

Dr_Paul

Established Member
Joined
3 Sep 2013
Messages
1,544
Agreed - a silly waste of money. Especially given that the existing (mostly informal) names used in practice on some of the lines are well-known and well-used - ie West London Line, Goblin, etc.
Exactly. It will be the North London Line so far as I'm concerned, none of this Mildmay Line nonsense. I bet they don't even pronounce it properly.
 

61653 HTAFC

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Dec 2012
Messages
19,347
Location
Yorkshire
I wish Crossrail was called Crossrail.
Me too.

As I've said elsewhere before, the Jubilee Line should have been renamed to the Elizabeth Line to mark QEII's passing. Having a line named for her 25th year on the throne is a bit daft when she made it to 70.
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
28,606
Location
Nottingham
Really the Fleet line name should have been used for Thameslink, as its central section follows the river pretty closely.
 

AF91

Member
Joined
21 Jun 2022
Messages
95
Location
Watford
After the flurry of initial publicity , barely any thing has seemed to have been updated. The official maps don't feature the new line names, nor do the disruption descriptions on the tfl website. I haven't seen much at the stations either
I presume they'll wait for a set go live date as there'd need to be a plan in place to switch over maps and signage within a set window.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top