Peter Mugridge
Veteran Member
We're going to have to make this tour Carlisle - Penzance due to the Pacer ban in Scotland.
They were tested on the Bathgate Line early on - I'm sure someone on here posted a picture or two a couple of years ago.
We're going to have to make this tour Carlisle - Penzance due to the Pacer ban in Scotland.
They were tested on the Bathgate Line early on - I'm sure someone on here posted a picture or two a couple of years ago.
One of these presumably: http://www.pacerpreservationsociety.co.uk/uploads/1/0/5/2/10525174/6110324_orig.jpg
Once they've finished the Marmaris tunnel, could we not send a pacer all the way to Asia? It's the least they deserve (then we could send the rest)
Before we realise it, this trip could go ahead. I'm sure it'd be fully booked.because it'd be a one off and I've never ridden on a pacer either.
Be careful what we wish for.![]()
Are pacers actually 'barred' from Scotland? I thought it was simply that Transport Scotland had barred them from operating scheduled services in Scotland- presumably at some point in the last decade or so they were worried about their better pre-privatisation units being cascaded South. In any case, I'd have thought an exception could be granted for a one-off railtour.
A Pacer going at its design speed of 75mph for long periods (or its "real" top speed which is somewhere near 90mph!) is going to be an extremely rough ride and the noise would be so terrific you would have a headache after such a long period.
Why not break it into three parts? You could have a Northern 142 from Scotland to say Newcastle, change to a Northern 144 from there to Bristol and then have a FGW or ATW 143 for the final stretch.![]()
I doubt it. Pacers have got very basic suspension & only two axles per vehicle. The ride is far smoother on a Voyager with its bogies and air bag suspension. Pacers are well known for giving drivers "bad backs" due to the rough ride
A Pacer going at its design speed of 75mph for long periods (or its "real" top speed which is somewhere near 90mph!) is going to be an extremely rough ride and the noise would be so terrific you would have a headache after such a long period.
Then there is the poor seating. You'd better hope it isn't a Pacer with its original "Bus" type seats, or worse still, the old Miseryrail "refurbished" examples.
A Pacer would not be able to tackle the Lickey incline on its own and the coupling is incompatible with the banking locomotive, so it would need a different route on the South to North trip.
I am going to be driving them on Severn Beach line soonI'll give my Osteopath advance warning
I think that's quite a reasonable idea, solves the issue of winding up with a pacer displaced by most of a day if we could just displace a number by about 4 hours!
Staggering between the different units would be good for the circulation in what remains of our legs too!
They were - 143s IIRC.
Plus, I think I've seen reference to them being used on Carlisle - Dumfries "shorts" in the past, but I could be wrong.
(obviously there's a big difference between being "banned" and "not being cleared because nobody has had to do the paperwork before because its never been a realistic possibility")
I also imagine that you'd need a 9 or 11-car formation in order to sell enough tickets to cover the costs!
Weren't Pacers banned from travelling in formations longer than 8 car after problems occurred when moving Pacers from Northern to FGW?
This is slightly off-topic, but doesn't really deserve it's own thread: Once the 142s (and possibly other pacers) are no longer needed or able to be used, would there be a case for NR or their maintenance contractors acquiring a few for use as track recording units/weedkiller units or whatever? Just a thought...
It's simply never going to happen. A "Pacer Farewell" will no doubt run in 2020 before they hit the scrap yard, probably with some sort of 8-car Pacer formation, but there's no way it's going to be running from Thurso to Penzance.