I thought I read somewhere that the lines through Bare Lane were operated as separate reversible lines, which might explain the convergence on to one line.
They are indeed treated as 2 separate single lines so yes the section of single track is needed there.
Ah, I think the op was referring to the Morecambe North Curve (Bare Lane- Carnforth).
Its former use was for Morecambe Promenade-Carnforth-Leeds trains (avoiding Lancaster) but around 30 years ago? services were diverted to run via Lancaster for connection with the main line. Of course the curve remains open, with a 'parliamentary' train. Not looked at the current timetable, but last year there was a Monday-Friday Lancaster-Morecambe-Leeds service and before that a Lancaster-Morecambe-Barrow ? train.
Sent from my 4009X using Tapatalk
As others have said after this point the two lines into Morecambe are effectively two separate single lines so if a train leaves Bare Line into Morecambe on Platform 1 it must return on Platform 1.
Its not ideal but its been the system used since the present station opened in 1994.
It's this currently: http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/Y03242/2017/04/24/advanced
(0546 Lancaster to Windermere with a reversal at Morecambe)
EDIT: And this as well http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/Y67952/2017/04/24/advanced (1605 Lancaster to Leeds)
Cheers for this, but how do you use the website to determine future services?
Or do they just advertise same with only 24 hours notice?
Most of these parliamentary services seem to leave you "stranded in the middle of nowhere"* but this one looks like it could be done on a reasonably handy (say) Lancaster-Kendal return?
*Thinking Stockport-Stalybridge and Chester-Runcorn.
Cheers for this, but how do you use the website to determine future services?
Or do they just advertise same with only 24 hours notice?
Most of these parliamentary services seem to leave you "stranded in the middle of nowhere"* but this one looks like it could be done on a reasonably handy (say) Lancaster-Kendal return?
*Thinking Stockport-Stalybridge and Chester-Runcorn.
Noticed this short section of single track line, just east of Bare Lane station.
Seems a bit incongrous but is its primary use to facilitate the network of rails to the east as a turning triangle?
...and does it ever get used much in this respect?
They are indeed treated as 2 separate single lines so yes the section of single track is needed there.
Used by trains carrying nuclear waste and fuel between Heysham 1 & 2 power stations and Sellafield Nuclear waste processing plant and fuel reprocessing site.
Additionally, the Heysham spur is only accessible from the southernmost line into Morecambe.
Just use the detailed search function for specific locations - there are lots of different filters that you can use to narrow down the search.
http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/search/advanced
Hmm, there doesn't seem any ability to do a date range search (only individual days).
...or have I missed something?
You can only search for a specific date. But to be fair most trains operate either Monday-Friday, Saturdays or Sundays across the length of the timetable period.
However, there is more info available:
Assuming you're using your desktop, when you get the results, click on the individual train ID, and look at the top left and the second line gives you the period of operation for that train.
If using a mobile, click on a train and then "Show service details" at the top and the same info becomes available.
Alternatively, if you are looking for parliamentary passenger services across the network, the following website is great for them:
http://www.psul4all.free-online.co.uk/intro.htm
Scroll down to halfway to select the service period.
I don't think that's true. The layout as designed, with two independent single lines beyond Bare Lane, allowed the operation of the branch to be simplified and the closure of the signal box at Morecambe whilst retaining the flexibility to have one train to/from Heysham (on one line) whilst still allowing a second to run to Morecambe only (on the other). Seems quite deliberate to me.The present Morecambe station opened in 1994 an I heard a rumour that because the layout was installed when the British Rail infrastructure was being transferred to Railtrack PLC it meant that it wasn't built properly hence why now it has two platforms that are not connected, I don't know if this is true or not.
I don't think that's true. The layout as designed, with two independent single lines beyond Bare Lane, allowed the operation of the branch to be simplified and the closure of the signal box at Morecambe whilst retaining the flexibility to have one train to/from Heysham (on one line) whilst still allowing a second to run to Morecambe only (on the other). Seems quite deliberate to me.
Not sure how the token works now that Bare Lane box has gone (into Preston PSB)
With the Leeds trains running through to Morecambe rather than terminating at Lancaster I am told that its because previously with the Little North Western Railway the Leeds trains went Wennington - Lancaster Green Ayre - Morecambe and then after that closed and the trains were diverted via Carnforth the services continued to run through to Morecambe just simply because thats what they had always done.
Is there still a token on the branch? Only because with the nuclear trains I would have thought it would have made the token system difficult.
I believe there's a long history of people from West Yorkshire (Bradford in particular) holidaying in Morecambe.
I believe there's a long history of people from West Yorkshire (Bradford in particular) holidaying in Morecambe.
There aren't any through trains from Bradford to Morecambe. And with regard to travelling to the major destination, Lancaster,given that a change is necessary then travelling from the Interchange and changing at Preston offers a more frequent and comfortable journey
And in the mid 60s when the Green Ayre route closed Bradford-on-Sea was still popular - indeed I've spotted Morecambe-bound passengers with suitcases at Shipley much more recently....
It was, I think, in RR days that someone cottoned onto the idea of running most of the trains to Lancaster - and as RRNE and RRNW were separate units, there was a period when even Morecambe via Lancaster couldn't be managed. Thankfully that, at least, is Past!
Yes and the points themselves are operated by the driver I think.
My understanding is that, previously, both single lines from Bare Lane were worked as OTW, the Heysham line with a staff (with a key attached to work the GFs at Morecambe and Heysham) and the Morecambe line without. Now, it seems that they're both OTW without staff, but with a key released (by Preston PSB) from an instrument at Morecambe to release the ground frames there and at Heysham.I'm sure it was a deliberate rationalisation to save operating cost.
While Bare Lane box was still open (closed 2013, I think), each single track from there to Morecambe had I believe some sort of token arrangement. Being operated in effect as two independent parallel single line token sections. On the southern 'Heysham' track, this also allows the train crew to operate ground frame at Morecambe for the points to/from Heysham, plus the run-round loop at Morecambe station (necessary for loco hauled trains, including the nuclear flasks). This avoided the cost of powering/motorising the points.
Not sure how the token works now that Bare Lane box has gone (into Preston PSB)
There aren't any through trains from Bradford to Morecambe. And with regard to travelling to the major destination, Lancaster,given that a change is necessary then travelling from the Interchange and changing at Preston offers a more frequent and comfortable journey
And in the mid 60s when the Green Ayre route closed Bradford-on-Sea was still popular - indeed I've spotted Morecambe-bound passengers with suitcases at Shipley much more recently....
It was, I think, in RR days that someone cottoned onto the idea of running most of the trains to Lancaster - and as RRNE and RRNW were separate units, there was a period when even Morecambe via Lancaster couldn't be managed. Thankfully that, at least, is Past!