• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Modern Railways: LNER and compulsory reservations

Status
Not open for further replies.

dan5324

Member
Joined
8 Jun 2011
Messages
307
Jess wept reading this it’s no wonder the railways are deserted yet roads are bursting at the seams...
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

kez19

Established Member
Joined
15 May 2020
Messages
2,205
Location
Dundee
I know its been spoken about but I looked on their twitter regarding reservations etc


So if someone who booked on specific trains that are delayed or cancelled - you now have to reserve for next available train so what happens if you are in area you don't properly know, trains are fully booked (per se) but yet you want to get to your destination what happens next? (this is probably worst case scenario), but I remember when my train was delayed from York to return to Newcastle, I went to the LNER ticket office (as I thought I missed the train yet was in the station prior), had been advised train ran late but will be on platform as planned but when I boarded (sure it was conductors own fault not mine, but conductor told me I was on wrong train and should be next train but yet my ticket matched the reservation)?, it also for me when you are on the right one you get a feeling you will be chucked off for no reason even though you have paid.

So in other words if I have booked a ticket on an either delayed or cancelled train I will have to rebook (hope for a seat) then apply for a delay repay, this situation looks like its causing more misery than being a simple solution?
 

Kite159

Veteran Member
Joined
27 Jan 2014
Messages
22,829
Location
West of Andover
I know its been spoken about but I looked on their twitter regarding reservations etc


So if someone who booked on specific trains that are delayed or cancelled - you now have to reserve for next available train so what happens if you are in area you don't properly know, trains are fully booked (per se) but yet you want to get to your destination what happens next? (this is probably worst case scenario), but I remember when my train was delayed from York to return to Newcastle, I went to the LNER ticket office (as I thought I missed the train yet was in the station prior), had been advised train ran late but will be on platform as planned but when I boarded (sure it was conductors own fault not mine, but conductor told me I was on wrong train and should be next train but yet my ticket matched the reservation)?, it also for me when you are on the right one you get a feeling you will be chucked off for no reason even though you have paid.

So in other words if I have booked a ticket on an either delayed or cancelled train I will have to rebook (hope for a seat) then apply for a delay repay, this situation looks like its causing more misery than being a simple solution?

Lucky the 11:33 to Leeds had spare seats to allow the passengers from the cancelled service to "reserve" seats.

Had it been a day where trains towards Leeds were all reserved, the passengers will probably get told to go via Euston or to wait until the next service with available seats...
 

kez19

Established Member
Joined
15 May 2020
Messages
2,205
Location
Dundee
Lucky the 11:33 to Leeds had spare seats to allow the passengers from the cancelled service to "reserve" seats.

Had it been a day where trains towards Leeds were all reserved, the passengers will probably get told to go via Euston or to wait until the next service with available seats...

totally understand and same time nightmare for some!
 

Ianigsy

Established Member
Joined
12 May 2015
Messages
1,348
So if someone who booked on specific trains that are delayed or cancelled - you now have to reserve for next available train so what happens if you are in area you don't properly know, trains are fully booked (per se) but yet you want to get to your destination what happens next? (this is probably worst case scenario), but I remember when my train was delayed from York to return to Newcastle, I went to the LNER ticket office (as I thought I missed the train yet was in the station prior), had been advised train ran late but will be on platform as planned but when I boarded (sure it was conductors own fault not mine, but conductor told me I was on wrong train and should be next train but yet my ticket matched the reservation)?, it also for me when you are on the right one you get a feeling you will be chucked off for no reason even though you have paid.

So in other words if I have booked a ticket on an either delayed or cancelled train I will have to rebook (hope for a seat) then apply for a delay repay, this situation looks like its causing more misery than being a simple solution?

Could be interesting if the train in question was the Highland Chieftain or the evening Skipton or Bradford.
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
23,378
Could be interesting if the train in question was the Highland Chieftain or the evening Skipton or Bradford.
Not really any different from the position before compulsory reservations. It is just the rebooking isn't just 'get on the next train', instead you need a replacement reservation.

Indeed, it may be better as they will know how many people need onward travel.
 

Taunton

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Aug 2013
Messages
12,313
Jess wept reading this it’s no wonder the railways are deserted yet roads are bursting at the seams...
This just sums it all up nicely, doesn't it, how the Railway Bubble just don't get it.

The railway should be bending over backwards currently to encourage as many people back as possible onto trains. Instead they come up with something the opposite.
 

kez19

Established Member
Joined
15 May 2020
Messages
2,205
Location
Dundee
Could be interesting if the train in question was the Highland Chieftain or the evening Skipton or Bradford.

This one at the time was from London to Edinburgh (wasn’t Azuma at time, or at time Azuma was being phased in)
 

Ianno87

Veteran Member
Joined
3 May 2015
Messages
15,214
This just sums it all up nicely, doesn't it, how the Railway Bubble just don't get it.

The railway should be bending over backwards currently to encourage as many people back as possible onto trains. Instead they come up with something the opposite.

Perhaps compulsory reservations and the seat guarantee that gives are what the 80-90% of the population who don't regularly use rail actually **want**? With easy app/Web based booking for reservation. Time for the industry to think differently and try a different tact - it's traditional user base may not come back. The "forum bubble" I'd argue doesn't get this.

For the next few years at least, I'd expect packing people onto crowded long distance trains Maundy Thursday style to be deemed pretty much unacceptable by many, and a terrible "shop window" for the industry. CR is the industry's solution - nobody has offered a better solution.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Not really any different from the position before compulsory reservations. It is just the rebooking isn't just 'get on the next train', instead you need a replacement reservation.

Indeed, it may be better as they will know how many people need onward travel.

Yes, they'll know immediately that X people will have missed a connection, and plan accordingly.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
44,409
Location
Yorks
Perhaps compulsory reservations and the seat guarantee that gives are what the 80-90% of the population who don't regularly use rail actually **want**? With easy app/Web based booking for reservation. Time for the industry to think differently and try a different tact - it's traditional user base may not come back. The "forum bubble" I'd argue doesn't get this.

For the next few years at least, I'd expect packing people onto crowded long distance trains Maundy Thursday style to be deemed pretty much unacceptable by many, and a terrible "shop window" for the industry. CR is the industry's solution - nobody has offered a better solution.

I think that there's a lot that they can do. My solution would be:

-Go to counted places for advanced purchase, just give people the option of a reservation if they want it.
-If a train is busy, make it easy and cheap/free for people to book on another train.

The problem is, the rail industry finds it easier to tie people down more and more. It's been going on for years - this is just the extension.

People don't want to be tied down. They are used to travelling when they like.
 

alistairlees

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2016
Messages
4,416
I think that there's a lot that they can do. My solution would be:

-Go to counted places for advanced purchase, just give people the option of a reservation if they want it.
-If a train is busy, make it easy and cheap/free for people to book on another train.

The problem is, the rail industry finds it easier to tie people down more and more. It's been going on for years - this is just the extension.

People don't want to be tied down. They are used to travelling when they like.
I think you have conflated "forum members" with "people" here. They are not the same.
 

Ianno87

Veteran Member
Joined
3 May 2015
Messages
15,214
People don't want to be tied down. They are used to travelling when they like.

Some people value the flexibility* yes. I'd wager a good chunk of LNER's passenger base are either on Advances, or on Flexible tickets but using their seat reservation (and have no interest in actually using the ticket flexibly). I know regular travellers who wouldn't dream.of "going for the earlier train" on the busiest days for long journeys, as they prefer the security of their booked seat and not having to "stampede" at King's Cross.

*Flexibility will of course still be possible on all but the busiest trains by re-reserving at least 5 mins before.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
44,409
Location
Yorks
I think you have conflated "forum members" with "people" here. They are not the same.

"People" are used to travelling where and when they want. "People" are motorists, bus users, cyclists, pedestrians and they don't have to book.
 

ash39

Established Member
Joined
8 Feb 2012
Messages
1,524
For the next few years at least, I'd expect packing people onto crowded long distance trains Maundy Thursday style to be deemed pretty much unacceptable by many, and a terrible "shop window" for the industry. CR is the industry's solution - nobody has offered a better solution.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

So the 'solution', as you call it, to getting people back onto trains is to stop trains becoming too crowded by making reservations compulsory?

Let that sink in, because it's absolute nonsense.
 

Ianno87

Veteran Member
Joined
3 May 2015
Messages
15,214
I think you have conflated "forum members" with "people" here. They are not the same.

And "people" (in the general sense) will have very different expectations of the service train operators should be providing in the post-Covid years. "Pack 'em in" ain't going to be acceptable.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
44,409
Location
Yorks
Some people value the flexibility* yes. I'd wager a good chunk of LNER's passenger base are either on Advances, or on Flexible tickets but using their seat reservation (and have no interest in actually using the ticket flexibly). I know regular travellers who wouldn't dream.of "going for the earlier train" on the busiest days for long journeys, as they prefer the security of their booked seat and not having to "stampede" at King's Cross.

*Flexibility will of course still be possible on all but the busiest trains by re-reserving at least 5 mins before.

But the point is, the people who are happy using advances and reservations are already using advances and reservations. The industry needs to attract people who are used to travelling when they want.
 

Ianno87

Veteran Member
Joined
3 May 2015
Messages
15,214
"People" are used to travelling where and when they want. "People" are motorists, bus users, cyclists, pedestrians and they don't have to book.

People have to book on plane journeys, for cinemas, dentist appointments, and countless other things...


So the 'solution', as you call it, to getting people back onto trains is to stop trains becoming too crowded by making reservations compulsory?

Let that sink in, because it's absolute nonsense.

Yes, because it spreads the load and makes more people feel comfortable with travelling overall. Let that sink in.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

But the point is, the people who are happy using advances and reservations are already using advances and reservations. The industry needs to attract people who are used to travelling when they want.

They might not be coming back. And those that do just need to open their phone up 5 mins before departure. No big deal.
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
23,378
So the 'solution', as you call it, to getting people back onto trains is to stop trains becoming too crowded by making reservations compulsory?

Let that sink in, because it's absolute nonsense.
All the radio adverts about trains at the moment emphasise three things:
* cleanliness
* booking a contactless ticket by application
* reserving space

These are undoubtedly what the railway thinks will encourage travel, not a free for all.
 

Domh245

Established Member
Joined
6 Apr 2013
Messages
8,426
Location
nowhere
So the 'solution', as you call it, to getting people back onto trains is to stop trains becoming too crowded by making reservations compulsory?

Let that sink in, because it's absolute nonsense.

"No, sorry, you can't travel on the train today when you (and most other people) want to - you'll have to take literally anything else instead...."
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
44,409
Location
Yorks
And "people" (in the general sense) will have very different expectations of the service train operators should be providing in the post-Covid years. "Pack 'em in" ain't going to be acceptable.

I don't think making people reserve a seat from Doncaster to York for example, is going to be acceptable either.
 

ash39

Established Member
Joined
8 Feb 2012
Messages
1,524
Yes, because it spreads the load and makes more people feel comfortable with travelling overall. Let that sink in.

No it doesn't. People want to travel when they want to travel. They will use alternatives, most likely the car.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
44,409
Location
Yorks
People have to book on plane journeys, for cinemas, dentist appointments, and countless other things...




Yes, because it spreads the load and makes more people feel comfortable with travelling overall. Let that sink in.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==



They might not be coming back. And those that do just need to open their phone up 5 mins before departure. No big deal.

A plane journey is not the same as an intermediate distance domestic journey for most people.

Railway people need to understand this.
 

Ianno87

Veteran Member
Joined
3 May 2015
Messages
15,214
"No, sorry, you can't travel on the train today when you (and most other people) want to - you'll have to take literally anything else instead...."

Most people are capable of organising their lives, if they need to be on a particular train.

I don't think making people reserve a seat from Doncaster to York for example, is going to be acceptable either.

Why? When it's easy and can be done with 5 minutes notice?

No it doesn't. People want to travel when they want to travel. They will use alternatives, most likely the car.

Or just wait for the next train in the pub.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

A plane journey is not the same as an intermediate distance domestic journey for most people.

Railway people need to understand this.

And regular rail users need to understand why non-regular users may be put off taking the train, and what needs to change to make that happen, and get new markets to rail.
 

ash39

Established Member
Joined
8 Feb 2012
Messages
1,524
All the radio adverts about trains at the moment emphasise three things:
* cleanliness
* booking a contactless ticket by application
* reserving space

These are undoubtedly what the railway thinks will encourage travel, not a free for all.

OK so let's say you're travelling to an event, for arguments sake a football match. Pre-Covid, all the trains leading up to kick off will be fairly busy with the last couple of services being full & standing.

So the solution we are now facing is to spread this out so some of the fans arrive hours before kick off and some at half time, then sit shoulder to shoulder (as close if not closer than on the train...) then after the match (and a few beers) patiently wait in a socially distanced queue at the station until its their turn to board the first train they could get a reservation on?

It won't be policed and people will end up boarding anyway.
 

Ianno87

Veteran Member
Joined
3 May 2015
Messages
15,214
OK so let's say you're travelling to an event, for arguments sake a football match. Pre-Covid, all the trains leading up to kick off will be fairly busy with the last couple of services being full & standing.

So the solution we are now facing is to spread this out so some of the fans arrive hours before kick off and some at half time, then sit shoulder to shoulder (as close if not closer than on the train...) then after the match (and a few beers) patiently wait in a socially distanced queue at the station until its their turn to board the first train they could get a reservation on?

It won't be policed and people will end up boarding anyway.

Looking at places like Euston, they already have well-rehearsed queueing procedures that prioritise reservation holders. It's really a non-issue.
 

Watershed

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
26 Sep 2020
Messages
16,781
Location
UK
Why? When it's easy and can be done with 5 minutes notice?
The journey time from York to Doncaster is shorter than a lot of Tube journeys. Would you just shrug your shoulders if TfL started demanding that commuters reserve a seat on the tube?

It's a bit of a head scratcher that some think the answer to a capacity problem (overcrowding) is reducing capacity (banning standing).

Most of the complaints/negative image from overcrowding happens when there is disruption - i.e. when capacity is at its lowest. So is CR going to be vigorously enforced then (meaning that people will be even more inconvenienced and delayed, possibly overnight)? Or are people going to be herded onto the next available train (in which case, why bother with CR at all)?
 

Domh245

Established Member
Joined
6 Apr 2013
Messages
8,426
Location
nowhere
Most people are capable of organising their lives, if they need to be on a particular train.

In many cases, I'd agree. But the times when CR is most likely to limit the number of people on a train (presumably encouraging people to take the train?) are things that they tend not to be able to control, like bank holidays or other large events. Railway either throws more capacity at it (which it can't/won't), suspends CR (to the annoyance of these passengers that have supposedly been won over by their guaranteed no-standing train), or tell people "tough luck, have you considered driving"
 

Ianno87

Veteran Member
Joined
3 May 2015
Messages
15,214
The journey time from York to Doncaster is shorter than a lot of Tube journeys. Would you just shrug your shoulders if TfL started demanding that commuters reserve a seat on the tube?
No, because that is false equivalence, and a totally different type of service (and Completely impractical).

It is mind boggling that some think the answer to a capacity problem (overcrowding) is reducing capacity (banning standing)...

No, the solution is to use reservations to better spread demand across the available capacity by directing passengers away from full trains in advance.That's really not a hard concept to grasp.
 

Kite159

Veteran Member
Joined
27 Jan 2014
Messages
22,829
Location
West of Andover
The journey time from York to Doncaster is shorter than a lot of Tube journeys. Would you just shrug your shoulders if TfL started demanding that commuters reserve a seat on the tube?

It's a bit of a head scratcher that some think the answer to a capacity problem (overcrowding) is reducing capacity (banning standing)...

Especially as someone travelling between York & Doncaster will be taking up a seat reservation away from someone travelling longer distance, whereas in the past if they had to stand for that short journey then they would.

Likewise Leeds - Wakefield
 

Ianno87

Veteran Member
Joined
3 May 2015
Messages
15,214
In many cases, I'd agree. But the times when CR is most likely to limit the number of people on a train (presumably encouraging people to take the train?) are things that they tend not to be able to control, like bank holidays or other large events. Railway either throws more capacity at it (which it can't/won't), suspends CR (to the annoyance of these passengers that have supposedly been won over by their guaranteed no-standing train), or tell people "tough luck, have you considered driving"

You could manage situations like that by deliberately holding back quotas of seats that are unreservedly until 24/48 hours before (or whatever) to keep some capacity for short-notice demand.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Especially as someone travelling between York & Doncaster will be taking up a seat reservation away from someone travelling longer distance, whereas in the past if they had to stand for that short journey then they would.

Likewise Leeds - Wakefield

Or it just fills capacity lost by longer distance reservations (e.g. a seat otherwise occupied north of York and south of Doncaster)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top