70014IronDuke
Established Member
- Joined
- 13 Jun 2015
- Messages
- 4,067
My, it's going to be interesting when oil prices get back up to where they're likely to be in 10 years and that electrification is going to start looking cheap by comparison and we're saddled with a lot of expensive intensive diesel mileage needing urgent wiring to prevent running cost budgets being blown.
I'm not a fan of bi-modes - I would have preferred diesel locos generating the power to power all-electric EMUs instead (that could obviously run without the loco when on the wires), but given we have bi-modes, then surely the main advantage of them is that they enable piecemeal electrification, so the obvious move here would be to move to a gradual rolling programme where shorter sections could be completed without having to complete huge projects in one big bang - i.e. rather than Kettering to Sheffield in one project, why not just slowly let the wires creep northwards gradually, with the switchover point moving with them as each bit gets turned on?
Good points. The alternative is to get rid of the electrification teams asap.
And then reform them in a decade or a bit more, at great cost, and .. making the same mistakes - again!
Once again, the Midland loses out, as it repeatedly did when part of BR LMR. Now it loses out with the promise of HS2 - which, by the way, was promised to be delivered "with no cutbacks to current rail investment" (approximate quote). Ha bloody ha!
As for sops - thinking out of the box - the next operator ought to promise opening the Burton-Coalville-Leicester line - somehow, by hook or by crook, this is a scandalously underused (or rather unused!) asset.