• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Mark IV carriages: Could TPE use them?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Segedunum

Established Member
Associate Staff
International Transport
Joined
22 Dec 2013
Messages
4,750
Location
Up North
Does XC currently have any routes that are 100% under the wires?
The only viable flow I can think of that's wholly under the wires would be Manchester Piccadilly to Birmingham New Street. (the wires continue to Coventry and Bromsgrove but I can't see them being popular or practical termini)
 

gimmea50anyday

Established Member
Joined
8 Jan 2013
Messages
3,456
Location
Back Cab
XC did used to run mk2 shuttles between Man and BHM which freed up a voyager or two for other services, but that was in the bad old days of Virgin, back when there was a country wide network...
 

NotATrainspott

Established Member
Joined
2 Feb 2013
Messages
3,304
Since TPE have already got a rolling stock solution, could the MK4 sets not find better use with XC? Even if they just worked Doncaster-Newcastle with shortened 91 sets, that would free up Voyagers for the core without any route clearance issues.

Additionally, they could then also replace (or supplement) the HST's with 67's (going cheap) and MK4 sets which would improve station dwell times and probably helps with DDA compliance too.

The ScotRail/XC/GWR HST upgrades have probably killed off any possibility of the Mk4s being used elsewhere. Extra conversions are now cheap and easy and the trains would be ready for use basically everywhere on the network. Shortened HSTs will be able to run faster and cheaper than traditional loco haulage of coaches, even with a DVT at the other end.
 

jopsuk

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2008
Messages
12,774
As in have a 67 on one end and a 91 on the other? Would have thought that would be rather tricky to get to work. On the other hand I'd imagine converting the Mark 4 DVTs to work with 67s or 68s should be a similar job to doing the same to the Mark 3 DVTs
 

Roast Veg

Established Member
Joined
28 Oct 2016
Messages
2,319
Unfortunately the classic idea of a 67 and Mk4 rake would be painfully slow and noisy without removing about half of the carriages.
 

CosherB

Established Member
Joined
23 Feb 2007
Messages
3,041
Location
Northwich
How many more times does it have to be posted that, even in crude terms, replacing a 6,500hp 91 with a 3,000hp 67 on a full Mk4 rake just isn't going to work as a viable high speed train? :roll:
 

superalbs

Verified Rep - Superalbs Travels
Joined
3 Jul 2014
Messages
2,833
Location
Kraków
How many more times does it have to be posted that, even in crude terms, replacing a 6,500hp 91 with a 3,000hp 67 on a full Mk4 rake just isn't going to work as a viable high speed train? :roll:

How about three Class 67s? :lol:
 

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
13,160
How many more times does it have to be posted that, even in crude terms, replacing a 6,500hp 91 with a 3,000hp 67 on a full Mk4 rake just isn't going to work as a viable high speed train? :roll:

It's quite mild for a SpacePhoenix 'suggestion'.
 

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
13,160
Assuming that the Mk4s and the DVTs have the same design maximum lifespan then the 225 sets will probably all go to the scrapyard as the 800s replace them

I specifically didn't mention them as they might last a little longer, seeing as they are 'passive' components.
 

Nym

Established Member
Joined
2 Mar 2007
Messages
9,784
Location
Somewhere, not in London
They do keep the lights on though...

And the convertors are in that nice, difficult to support dark zone of the late 80s / early 90s. Probably with NOS only caps, crowbar and main invertors...
 

CosherB

Established Member
Joined
23 Feb 2007
Messages
3,041
Location
Northwich
Assuming that the Mk4s and the DVTs have the same design maximum lifespan then the 225 sets will probably all go to the scrapyard as the 800s replace them

Why? Carefully looked after LHCS should last a lot longer than 35 years. Just look at Mk3s and HSTs ....
 

GrimShady

Established Member
Joined
13 Dec 2016
Messages
1,740
Can someone explain why the MKIV is thought of as cheap rubbish and what the maintenance issues are with them?

Metro Cammell products were renowned as good were they not?
 
Last edited:

Jonny

Established Member
Joined
10 Feb 2011
Messages
2,577
Can someone explain why the MKIV is thought of as cheap rubbish and what the maintenance issues are with them?

Metro Cammell products were renowned as good were they not?

The interiors weren't exactly well specified, but the coaches themselves were pretty decent. They were also designed to fit the profile of a tilting train, although they were never fully equipped for it.
 

Roast Veg

Established Member
Joined
28 Oct 2016
Messages
2,319
The 91s have been run very hard throughout their lives and are definitely at end of life, but the Mk4s have plenty of use in them to come as long as locos with a high enough ETS rating and TDM exist. It wouldn't be the end of the world if they never saw 125mph again.
 

GrimShady

Established Member
Joined
13 Dec 2016
Messages
1,740
The interiors weren't exactly well specified, but the coaches themselves were pretty decent. They were also designed to fit the profile of a tilting train, although they were never fully equipped for it.

The original interiors were terrible but the Mallard upgrade seen to that. Id still rather travel in them than anything with an engine under the floor although as I said before being propelled sometimes can be uncomfortable.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
31,072
Location
Redcar
Discussion of the 800s is off-topic. Any further such posts will be deleted. Please use the relvent existing thread or start a new thread if there is not already one available.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top