• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Loco number change while being preserved

Status
Not open for further replies.

yummy125

Member
Joined
2 Oct 2010
Messages
243
When a loco has been saved & is preserved, can the owner change the numbers back to it's either original or after TOPS number instead of being say a 47/7 or 47/8.

e.g.

47 793 - used to be "D1778" :: October 23rd 1964 & "47183" :: February 1974

47 840 - used to be "D1661" :: February 13th 1965 & "47077" :: February 1974
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

E&W Lucas

Established Member
Joined
21 Jan 2010
Messages
1,358
When a loco has been saved & is preserved, can the owner change the numbers back to it's either original or after TOPS number instead of being say a 47/7 or 47/8.

e.g.

47 793 - used to be "D1778" :: October 23rd 1964 & "47183" :: February 1974

47 840 - used to be "D1661" :: February 13th 1965 & "47077" :: February 1974

You own it, you can paint whatever number you like on it!
 

12CSVT

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2010
Messages
2,611
If i owned a class 47, i'd paint the number 03 203 on it to annoy enthusiasts...

Conversely if you owned a steam loco which was registered for main line running, you could wind up the photters by re-numbering it to its 98xxx TOPS number (98715 'Scots Guardsman' for example). <D
 

LE Greys

Established Member
Joined
6 Mar 2010
Messages
5,389
Location
Hitchin
It's already been done. A certain loco, which was in full BR condition, was renumbered back to 4472 and had her smoke deflectors taken off but not her single chimney restored. Result, deflectors went back on and we had a loco with a 'wrong' number.

Whether it applied to main line registered diesels is another question. If restoration involves removing certain features (for example disabling the ETH to restore steam heating) then you have just changed the sub-class, so leaving the xx4xx number is inaccurate.

Incidentally, if the 5AT ever gets built, I want her to be 98501.
 

fgwrich

Established Member
Joined
15 Apr 2009
Messages
10,630
Location
Hampshire
As has another certain loco. Now complete with 70s style Stratford Union Jacks adorning its side, 47580.

Formerly:

1762

47167

47580

47732

And now back into it's Stratford 47 Guise as 47580.
 

12CSVT

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2010
Messages
2,611
Let's not forget that a few years ago, two class 50s were on the main line with ficticious numbers 50012 and 50028 (real identities being 50031 and 50049)
 

Trainfan344

Established Member
Joined
13 Oct 2012
Messages
2,305
As has another certain loco. Now complete with 70s style Stratford Union Jacks adorning its side, 47580.

Formerly:

1762

47167

47580

47732

And now back into it's Stratford 47 Guise as 47580.

coupled up to 47579 as well.
 

steamybrian

Established Member
Joined
26 Nov 2010
Messages
1,997
Location
Kent
On the Spa Valley Railway
37254 has been renumbered to 37153 to confuse enthusiasts.
 

LE Greys

Established Member
Joined
6 Mar 2010
Messages
5,389
Location
Hitchin
Then there have been a few temporary renumberings, including this wooden nameplate and numberplate for 5051 at Didcot to 5069 for Brunel's 200th birthday - another shameless posting of my own images.
 

Attachments

  • IKB5069.jpg
    IKB5069.jpg
    138.3 KB · Views: 17
  • IKB5069(1).jpg
    IKB5069(1).jpg
    133.9 KB · Views: 19
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top