14:30 off London Kings Cross.Does anyone know the diagram, departure time or what days this Newcastle train will be running yet?
I can't find the website that had the 2025 timetables during the consolation. Anyone know the link for it please? Wondering what the stops and return working will be too.14:30 off London Kings Cross.
No, the 91s have always been geared for 160 mph max. Regearing might have been considered many years ago during their HGR at Doncaster, but in those days the East Coast was almost solid 91s and HSTs which shared similar acceleration profiles. They won't spend that kind of money this late in their careers.Are the Class 91s still geared for 140mph operation? If so I wonder whether regearing for 125mph would make enough difference to allow 2+8 formations by improving the acceleration enough. (I presume it's acceleration to match the Azumas that's the key factor here given both types do 125mph in service)
1430 is an Edinburgh fast, so that can't be right?14:30 off London Kings Cross.
Should be within this thread, but you may need to run some through the Wayback Machine to actually view the timetables:I can't find the website that had the 2025 timetables during the consolation. Anyone know the link for it please? Wondering what the stops and return working will be too.
Mod Note: It appears that there are currently four separate consultations underway between CrossCountry, LNER, Transpennine Express, Northern and Great Northern/Thameslink relating to the May 2022 timetable change and their ECML services. Links to all four are below and some documents have been attached for posterity (but note not all available documents have been attached). For the time being we would ask that members use this thread for their thoughts and comments on the various consultations as there is clearly going to be overlap due the winners and losers. We may split out some posts if a significant sub-discussion develops and would ask members to use the report function if they spot one to help us manage what could be quite a lengthy and complicated thread.
1430 is an Edinburgh fast, so that can't be right?
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
Should be within this thread, but you may need to run some through the Wayback Machine to actually view the timetables:
https://www.railforums.co.uk/thread...ay-2022-east-coast-mainline-timetable.218555/
Page 3 of this doc https://onedrive.live.com/?redeem=aHR0cHM6Ly8xZHJ2Lm1zL2YvcyFBdGJiYmM4Yi1NT2hsTUlGZ3hUd3Nka2xtb2lialE&cid=A1C3F81BCF6DDBD6&sb=name&sd=1&id=A1C3F81BCF6DDBD6!336135&parId=A1C3F81BCF6DDBD6!336134&o=OneUpAll on this folder https://1drv.ms/f/s!Atbbbc8b-MOhlMIFgxTwsdklmoibjQ
Thank you for that link.Page 3 of this doc https://onedrive.live.com/?redeem=aHR0cHM6Ly8xZHJ2Lm1zL2YvcyFBdGJiYmM4Yi1NT2hsTUlGZ3hUd3Nka2xtb2lialE&cid=A1C3F81BCF6DDBD6&sb=name&sd=1&id=A1C3F81BCF6DDBD6!336135&parId=A1C3F81BCF6DDBD6!336134&o=OneUp
Seems to concur that 14:30 is still an Edinburgh fast in the Dec 2025 timetable. Maybe it'll change idk
Ah yes, thanks - 2 columns over so don't know how I missed it lol1433 would be the Newcastle stopper. Calls at Stevenage, Grantham, York, Northallerton, Darlington, Durham and Newcastle unless it’s changed since the consultation.
1N09 / 1Y20 runs 7 days a week in the same timings.Will this just be a Monday - Friday service or will it run weekends too?
Won't give you a lot. You would be better improving speeds lower down the range. Improve your minimum speeds rather than your maximum speeds.Are the Class 91s still geared for 140mph operation? If so I wonder whether regearing for 125mph would make enough difference to allow 2+8 formations by improving the acceleration enough. (I presume it's acceleration to match the Azumas that's the key factor here given both types do 125mph in service)
Does this mean the class 91’s are no longer doing a Newcastle run? Or just a different timing to what was first said?The plan was the 14.33 SX and 12.33 SSuO but this will now be an Azuma.
No longer going to Newcastle. It will be an 800-9 instead.Does this mean the class 91’s are no longer doing a Newcastle run? Or just a different timing to what was first said?
91105 has not been reregistered in TOPS. Just like 37424 "Avro Vulcan XH558" was not actually reregistered as 37558.Just spotted this Class 91 (91105) in a new railway 200 livery being hauled by 37501 through Crofton, heading to the National Railway Museum at York. The locomotive has been renumbered 91150.
View attachment 183276
GuttedNo longer going to Newcastle. It will be an 800-9 instead.
If it is indeed the case that the whole timetable is written to Azuma performance, then yes.If they're not going to Newcastle, do they still need to shorten the sets ?
Yes. The shortening is to improve their SRT/performance.If they're not going to Newcastle, do they still need to shorten the sets ?
The shortened Mk4 sets are timed as such, not as 80x-E. 225-7 or E/330 or 91/330 depending on who you ask.If it is indeed the case that the whole timetable is written to Azuma performance, then yes.
If it is indeed the case that the whole timetable is written to Azuma performance, then yes.
Yes. The shortening is to improve their SRT/performance.
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
The shortened Mk4 sets are timed as such, not as 80x-E. 225-7 or E/330 or 91/330 depending on who you ask.
Does this mean no 225s all week or just at the weekend? Also what is the source of this?The plan was the 14.33 SX and 12.33 SSuO but this will now be an Azuma.
Tell me why you think they should be used on Newcastle trains in the first place, as opposed to being restricted to Leeds & York trains.How comes one won’t be running to Newcastle anymore?
Because I want to have a trip to Newcastle and they are a lot more comfortable to travel in than an Azuma.Tell me why you think they should be used on Newcastle trains in the first place, as opposed to being restricted to Leeds & York trains.
My understanding is that this is inaccurate and there is still one 225 diagram per day going to Newcastle.No longer going to Newcastle. It will be an 800-9 instead.