How do you tell the difference?
The aluminium tables and chairs nearest the edge are the public seating. The "cafe-only" seats are all in cordoned-off areas. If you saw the layout it would make sense - wish I had a photo.
How do you tell the difference?
The aluminium tables and chairs nearest the edge are the public seating. The "cafe-only" seats are all in cordoned-off areas. If you saw the layout it would make sense - wish I had a photo.
One thing I'm wondering now the main station has moved to the side, is if they shouldn't just renumber the platforms so 0 becomes 1, and so on - but actually reverse them so platform 11 becomes 1 and then it counts up so 0 becomes 11.
I presume the plan is still to renumber the platforms at some stage, with the necessary signalling upgrades that go with it? If so, what do people think?
Welcome to the forum! Yes, you're absolutely right. Perhaps someone could go to the LU entrance with a huge finger pointing the other way saying "Victoria Line this way!"Ive been through Kings Cross every six weeks or so over the last three years and found - a year or so ago - that the signs for the Victoria tube line send you the long way round. I now get to the bottom of the stairs from the arrivals hall and turn left rather than right! The distance to the Victoria tube platforms is cut by at least a half by going this way.
(Anyone using the mobile theme can't see the titles in subsequent posts anyway).Welcome to the forum! Yes, you're absolutely right. Perhaps someone could go to the LU entrance with a huge finger pointing the other way saying "Victoria Line this way!"![]()
I still rather like the idea of renumbering the whole KX/St P/Thameslink complex in the same sequence.....
I presume the plan is still to renumber the platforms at some stage, with the necessary signalling upgrades that go with it? If so, what do people think?
Ive been through Kings Cross every six weeks or so over the last three years and found - a year or so ago - that the signs for the Victoria tube line send you the long way round. I now get to the bottom of the stairs from the arrivals hall and turn left rather than right! The distance to the Victoria tube platforms is cut by at least a half by going this way.
Ive been through Kings Cross every six weeks or so over the last three years and found - a year or so ago - that the signs for the Victoria tube line send you the long way round. I now get to the bottom of the stairs from the arrivals hall and turn left rather than right! The distance to the Victoria tube platforms is cut by at least a half by going this way.
But St. Pancras is a completly different station. Why would you want combine its platform numbers with King's Cross?I still rather like the idea of renumbering the whole KX/St P/Thameslink complex in the same sequence.
Why would you go into St. Pancras to access the Underground if you were arriving/departing from King's Cross?Which way should one actually go then? I've always (well not always, but in recent months) gone into the underground entrance by the entrance to the South Eastern platforms at St Pancras, and to get from there to the Victoria line platforms I seem to have to walk fror ages, along the tunnel leading to Kings Cross Thameslink/Pentonville Road. Then, whenever I come back to Kings Cross/St Pancras and follow signs to St Pancras I invariably end up in the ticket hall by Euston Road rather than the new ticket hall.
But St. Pancras is a completly different station. Why would you want combine its platform numbers with King's Cross?
Why would you go into St. Pancras to access the Underground if you were arriving/departing from King's Cross?
I don't know the answer to that one, why would you?
Apologies if the above sounds a bit sarcastic, but arriving into St Pancras you can either walk across Pancras Road to Kings Cross and then go down to the northern ticket hall, or go down inside St Pancras station, walk under Pancras road, and reach the ticket hall that way. (I assume that this is the way that Dan-From-Hull goes although I'm now starting to wondert if he takes an entirely different route.
That said, I don't agree with SWT Passenger at all. I can understand that its reasonabl;e to re-route people when its congested, but making people, especially those arriving with luggage after a long journey from Scotland France or Belgium, walk a few hundred extra yards purely for the hell of it is taking the biscuit.
I thought Dan from Hull was commenting on the length of time it takes to get from there to the Victoria Line platforms, which seems to be miles, and saying that you are being sent a long way round if you follow the signs from the ticket hall. If there is a shorter route I'd like to know what it is - or have I misrread something?
I have to confess that I nearly always go up that way and immediately exit, ignoring the 'emergency exit' signs.
So what's the point of the signage as it is?
I saw on 'the Tube' what it was like at Victoria where there aren't the long passageways; a minor delay and instantly people are going down the escalators immediately into a packed crowd of people. Can you see the problem here - where people at the top are uncontrollably being fed into a static crowd?
Adding further lengths of passageway might be problematic as you would simply end up with an even larger and very nearly static mass of people, which would make evacuation harder and possibly would prevent diversion routes for passengers who cannot use certain parts of the station. However, the current ongoing redevelopment of Victoria Tube station will ensure that passengers are further spread out between platforms, between entrances and at the barriers, and there will be scope for some passageways to only be used in peak hours, if I remember correctly.
Useful for bypassing the gatelines if you haven't got a ticket too!