DarloRich
Veteran Member
my station only has one platform so it is incredibly prestigious. I would have to walk otherwise 
To add to the list: the only major London station to have a "house" platform 1 is Paddington. At Victoria it was 2 (for royalty and the Night Ferry but 8 for the Golden Arrow), Kings Cross 8 York was 8 (now 5), Reading used to be 4....
Major trains from King's Cross depart from Platform 0 or 1. York's Platform 1 is a bay for local services to Selby, Hull and Pontefract, the main platforms there are 3, 5 & 9.
What's your criteria for 'major trains' because I've had just every VTEC destination out of any of platforms 0 - 8.
Matthew and Son had to run to platform 1 as sung by Cat Stevens.
Are there any other platforms given credit in songs?
Would Platform 6, or any other number, have had the same impact?
Oh as the train pulled into platform three
I looked around for my best girl to see
As she disembarked but I didn’t seem to care
‘Cos someone passed that made me stop and stare
Platform 1 at Colchester will give you EMUs to Clacton. Hardly prestigious, I would think.
Platform 1 at Coventry is the "preferred" platform for Southbound Pendolinos, being step-free with the main concourse. It is (unusually) even stated as such in the Timetable Planning Rules.
(I'm not aware of such a statement for anywhere else, other than Platforms 3-7 at Euston being preferred for Virgin's West Midlands services).
Looking at all the replies, I can't help but feel very sorry for the former platform 1 at Clapham Junction. For ages it stood there, looking all sorry for itself. Then suddenly, the chance to go back to the glory days came along when the ELL extension came about! It must have got so excited, but then:
'Oh no don't worry we'll just build a new platform on the south end of 2 and we'll call that 2, then platform 2 can become platform 1'
Now demoted to the number 0, the poor thing must be very depressed.
Bournemouth's Platform 1 is rather prestigious. So prestigious in fact that nobody dare use it![]()
It sort of reminds me of platform 9 and 3/4 in the Harry Potter books... just keep banging into the side of the wall on platform 2 and you'll eventually get to a little tucked-away platform that no-one else seems to know about![]()
In the book it was between 9 and 10. She didn't seem to realise that that was in the suburban section.
I pride myself on the fact that I've neither read the books nor seen the films. In the films, did the Hogwarts Express appear too long to fit in that section of the station? Indeed how long would a train taking a bunch of weird kids to a boarding school actually need to be? They'd have been fine on a pair of 313s I'd have thought!
The Hogwarts Express normally ran, under the purview of the Department of Magical Transportation, with five coaches including a luggage coach which was considered roughly the normal amount. Whilst this would normally not be enough for the pupils the school holds, it was suggested that each coach is expanded slightly with the use of Expansion Charms which would then be more fitting. Interestingly, the train once ran with just four coaches but then gained a fifth one around the time of the fifth film - this could indicate that more pupils were admitted to Hogwarts in that year... Bearing in mind people would want to be sure that You-Know-Who and his followers were really gone before having children, that would actually make sense time wise
Only standard class accommodation was on offer with an at seat trolley service provided that only sold sweets, soft drinks and small food items. Despite this, at least one carriage had eating tables provided. There was also no train staff except for the trolley woman and the guard.
The route to Hogwarts is not electrified and never could be because magical wards prevent the use of electricity in places of large magical usage such as Hogwarts.
Dear gods... I'm the site's resident expert, aren't I?
)Okay... how about diesel powered/hauled 442s?
(I just HAD to do that)
Why would they need to be hauled? Just use magic...
(while they're at it they could put the buffet and compartments back too!).
The Hogwarts Express normally ran, under the purview of the Department of Magical Transportation, with five coaches including a luggage coach which was considered roughly the normal amount. Whilst this would normally not be enough for the pupils the school holds, it was suggested that each coach is expanded slightly with the use of Expansion Charms which would then be more fitting. Interestingly, the train once ran with just four coaches but then gained a fifth one around the time of the fifth film - this could indicate that more pupils were admitted to Hogwarts in that year... Bearing in mind people would want to be sure that You-Know-Who and his followers were really gone before having children, that would actually make sense time wise
Only standard class accommodation was on offer with an at seat trolley service provided that only sold sweets, soft drinks and small food items. Despite this, at least one carriage had eating tables provided. There was also no train staff except for the trolley woman and the guard.
The route to Hogwarts is not electrified and never could be because magical wards prevent the use of electricity in places of large magical usage such as Hogwarts.
Dear gods... I'm the site's resident expert, aren't I?
Most of this info is not in the books.
Rowling has no sense of number anyway. In an interview she said Hogwarts had about 1000 students; yet if Harry's cohort is typical there can be at most 280 or so.
The Hogwarts Express normally ran, under the purview of the Department of Magical Transportation, with five coaches including a luggage coach which was considered roughly the normal amount. Whilst this would normally not be enough for the pupils the school holds, it was suggested that each coach is expanded slightly with the use of Expansion Charms which would then be more fitting. Interestingly, the train once ran with just four coaches but then gained a fifth one around the time of the fifth film - this could indicate that more pupils were admitted to Hogwarts in that year... Bearing in mind people would want to be sure that You-Know-Who and his followers were really gone before having children, that would actually make sense time wise
Only standard class accommodation was on offer with an at seat trolley service provided that only sold sweets, soft drinks and small food items. Despite this, at least one carriage had eating tables provided. There was also no train staff except for the trolley woman and the guard.
The route to Hogwarts is not electrified and never could be because magical wards prevent the use of electricity in places of large magical usage such as Hogwarts.
Dear gods... I'm the site's resident expert, aren't I?
There's no reason to imagine that parents of children of Harry's age would be wiped out more than parents of children a year or two older or younger than Harry. Many of them would be the same people anyway.Yes, but if you remember, the fact that the his group is smaller is down to the simple fact that many families were wiped out completely by the Dark Lord - hence the smaller sizes.
Platform 1 at Salisbury isn't even used anymore for public use
Could it be brought back into use easily?