• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Is it the end for GBR??

Status
Not open for further replies.

Railman

Member
Joined
17 Jul 2012
Messages
97
Article in the Guardian newspaper seems to think the GBR bill might not get through in time for 2024, with the demise of Schapps and the slow progress is it really just another plan to be put in the Bin??
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
113,091
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Seems like. Now can we get rid of those manky 1970s designs, that clumsy font, the overuse of the red double arrow on every other sign etc and get a decent agency in to design a modern look for the railway?
 

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
21,902
Location
Mold, Clwyd
The new Transport Secretary, Anne-Marie Trevelyan, has made her first speech in the job, at the Tory Conference.
No mention of any of the big issues like GBR.
Her big idea, it seems, is to solve the national road pothole problem.
In her speech to the Conservative Party conference Transport Secretary Anne-Marie Trevelyan told members she plans to fix "10 million potholes a year".
She said this pledge will be achieved through a special "pothole fund".
Earlier this year, the AA said that from April 2018 to June 2021, there were over 1.5m potholes on local roads reported to the 51 UK councils the firm spoke to.
A statement along with the data added: "The total number is likely to be much higher than that due to this figure not including potholes on motorways and major roads, and many being unreported."
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/uk-politics-63114183 (1635)
 

43066

Veteran Member
Joined
24 Nov 2019
Messages
12,089
Location
London
Article in the Guardian newspaper seems to think the GBR bill might not get through in time for 2024, with the demise of Schapps and the slow progress is it really just another plan to be put in the Bin??

If so, it won’t be the first brave new beginning that hasn’t really led anywhere. A bit like the “Digital Railway” a few years ago that we were told would be expanded over the entire network within a few years, only to go very quiet and sink without trace.
 
Last edited:

Nicholas Lewis

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2019
Messages
7,991
Location
Surrey
Anne Marie Trevalyn spoke at Tory conference today didn't specifically raise GBR but said

We want to transform the rail industry to make it sustainable for the next hundred years, so the very last thing that the country needs right now is more damaging industrial disputes

at least acknowledges something needs to change and she seems to want to get the strikes resolved although without saying anything about whether more money is on offer

My message to the trade union membership is simple: please take your seats at the negotiating table and let’s find a landing zone which we can all work with. Punishing passengers and inflicting damage on our economy by striking is not the answer.

I can tell you there is a deal to be done between the unions and our train operators, it’s a deal that will require compromise. So, I want to see positive proposals to bridge those differences.

reported by Evening Standard

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/pol...association-transport-secretary-b1030211.html
 

dorsetdesiro

On Moderation
Joined
30 Oct 2017
Messages
766
Maybe move this to the Speculative thread?

I reckon the current government may prioritise on sorting the strike action, also depending on Covid this winter whether commuters will return also everyone tightening their wallets what with the energy crisis and spending less on rail travel.

They may also focus on the smart motorway fiasco?

If a general election is to occur in the near future, due to discontent with new PM and Chancellor, then a possible change of government (different party) could change policy so the new entity may not be called GBR at all.
 

8A Rail

Established Member
Joined
6 Dec 2012
Messages
1,351
Location
Mars
Seems like. Now can we get rid of those manky 1970s designs, that clumsy font, the overuse of the red double arrow on every other sign etc and get a decent agency in to design a modern look for the railway?

Why waste more money on something like that when there are far more important things that are needed on the railways, including reinstating some trains post Covid! The existing Double Arrow sign does its job and everyone knows what is stands for too. Likewise a 'decent agency' will no doubt charge the earth for something will still resemble what we have now, words that we are able to read regardless of font, colour etc.
 

ymbongo

Member
Joined
8 Aug 2022
Messages
13
Location
Wales
This article in Modern Railways appeared recently:

The legislation within the Government’s Transport Bill which will enact the implementation of the Williams-Shapps Plan for Rail and formally create the new Great British Railways organisation has been deferred, Modern Railways understands.

According to a document issued by the Great British Railways Transition Team, seen by Modern Railways, the reason for the deferral is that the Government is prioritising emergency legislation in response to the cost of living and energy price situation. The document adds that further details on the timing of the planned legislation on rail reform and the Future of Transport ‘will need to be confirmed in light of this’, and legislation will be taken forward when Parliamentary time allows.

Modern Railways understands the Transport Bill may proceed, but without the rail reform elements, as there are other aspects of the Bill which may remain a Government priority. The Bill was announced in the Queen’s Speech which opened the current Parliament on 10 May, and a consultation on the proposed legislation ran from 9 June to 4 August. However, unfolding events and the appointment of a new Prime Minister, Secretary of State for Transport and Rail Minister have changed Government priorities.

A Department for Transport spokesperson told Modern Railways the Parliamentary timetable was still to be confirmed. In an interview with Modern Railways in May, former Transport Secretary Grant Shapps had emphasised the importance of the legislation being passed in the current Parliamentary session if GBR was to acquire if powers in 2024 as planned.

https://www.modernrailways.com/article/legislation-create-gbr-deferred
 

eldomtom2

On Moderation
Joined
6 Oct 2018
Messages
2,364
Anne Marie Trevalyn spoke at Tory conference today didn't specifically raise GBR but said



at least acknowledges something needs to change and she seems to want to get the strikes resolved although without saying anything about whether more money is on offer
I'm fairly certain Truss has repeatedly stated she plans to introduce minimum service legislation.
 

TurboMan

Member
Joined
5 Apr 2022
Messages
422
Location
UK
Now can we get rid of those manky 1970s designs, that clumsy font, the overuse of the red double arrow on every other sign etc and get a decent agency in to design a modern look for the railway?
The DRU, Jock Kinneir and Margaret Calvert - some of the most celebrated graphic designers of the 20th century - not decent enough for you?
 

Energy

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2018
Messages
5,135
Anne Marie Trevalyn spoke at Tory conference today didn't specifically raise GBR but said



at least acknowledges something needs to change and she seems to want to get the strikes resolved although without saying anything about whether more money is on offer



reported by Evening Standard

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/pol...association-transport-secretary-b1030211.html
While the railway is still in dispute with the unions I expect not too many big announcements which the unions could take interest in (e.g GBR) with it being played safe for now.

Much better than Shapps with his "unofficial strike action".
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
44,276
Location
Yorks
The railway priority for this Government (however long it lasts) ought to be getting the trains running to some semblance of normality. That seems enough of a challenge right now.
 

Thirteen

Established Member
Joined
3 Oct 2021
Messages
1,892
Location
London
I reckon GBR will be put on ice for now but I could see it being revived by Labour in some form if they get at the next election.

I'm fairly certain Truss has repeatedly stated she plans to introduce minimum service legislation.

It's been touted by the Conservatives since 2019 and it still hasn't happened.

Anne Marie Trevalyn spoke at Tory conference today didn't specifically raise GBR but said



at least acknowledges something needs to change and she seems to want to get the strikes resolved although without saying anything about whether more money is on offer



reported by Evening Standard

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/pol...association-transport-secretary-b1030211.html

Anne-Marie Trevelyan does seem a lot less confrontational compared to Shapps who was always picking a fight, whether it was with the unions or with Sadiq Khan and TfL.
 

RobShipway

Established Member
Joined
20 Sep 2009
Messages
3,337
I doubt that it will happen, but hopefully with Anne-Marie Trevelyan as Transport Secretary there will be a lot less conflicts between Government, Unions and the local transport authorities which are not run by conservative members of party.

To be honest I never saw the point of GBR and did think it was a waste of money when you have already got in many ways a good platform with using BR, especially with using the existing signs at stations.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
44,276
Location
Yorks
Anne-Marie Trevelyan does seem a lot less confrontational compared to Shapps who was always picking a fight, whether it was with the unions or with Sadiq Khan and TfL.

That's one of the few elements of hope with this government.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
44,276
Location
Yorks
Its coming this time though.

Having experienced this Saturday just gone, I'm becoming more sympathetic to the idea. Afterall, if the passenger railway is so insignificant that we can let vast swathes of the country go without a train service several times a year, why did we bother keeping it going during lockdown.
 

Energy

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2018
Messages
5,135
Having experienced this Saturday just gone, I'm becoming more sympathetic to the idea. Afterall, if the passenger railway is so insignificant that we can let vast swathes of the country go without a train service several times a year, why did we bother keeping it going during lockdown.
Ideally we'd adopt a similar method to other countries with barriers being locked open and no ticket checks on strike days.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
44,276
Location
Yorks
Ideally we'd adopt a similar method to other countries with barriers being locked open and no ticket checks on strike days.

That would be the best solution. Maximum disruption to Government/management, less to third parties.
 

Energy

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2018
Messages
5,135
That would be the best solution. Maximum disruption to Government/management, less to third parties.
Mass disruption to everyone gets them PR, which the unions currently want. Currently the public's perspective is more positive though I suspect this will shift with more strikes.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
44,276
Location
Yorks
Unfortunately I believe that is illegal in the UK.

Fundamentally, the Government isn't an impartial bystander, so it's not in its interest to change it. It would shift the inconvenience away from passengers onto itself.

It's telling that other, more sensible countries have this option.
 

Mag_seven

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
1 Sep 2014
Messages
11,947
Location
here to eternity
Can we try and keep this thread discussing the likelihood of GBR not happening and not go down the current rail strikes rabbit hole.

thanks
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top