• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

If every GWR IET has an on board kitchen...

Status
Not open for further replies.

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
18,878
I think we went through a lot of this on an earlier thread about buffets on IETs. Yes the kitchens are an expensive waste of space on most services. The dining services are though popular,particularly with business types on expenses. That market is worth exploiting,however a dedicated fleet of 10 9car sets for restaurant services could cover all diagrams plus spare cover. Should one not be available then it would be just like having a small buffet HST and the dining service would not be available on that occasion
Just how big is the “business types on expenses” market? Many companies have a standard class only travel policy.

As an example, I went to a meeting in Amsterdam last year which was attended by the CFO. No first class travel there: she’d flown over on easyJet.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Clarence Yard

Established Member
Joined
18 Dec 2014
Messages
3,272
[QUOTE="Gerald Fiennes, post: 4485834, member:] the DfT accepted that the 2005/06 relet contract -- the last time it was competitively tendered -- wasn't going to work and let GW off the back-end loaded premium that they had bid.

Also recall that the 802s are not fully interchangeable with the 800s: they deliver just over 25% more power from each engine and have larger fuel tanks to cope with the Devon Banks.[/QUOTE]

The DfT did not let anyone off that contract - it wasn’t their decision. That was the deal struck when the franchise was let. It was up to FG to exercise the option - it was effectively a one way bet for FG!

Hopefully for the last time on this forum, the 800 and 802 units have had the same larger 1550L tanks fitted since entry into service and likewise all their engines have been set at 700kw (940hp). If you are using wiki as your source on this, it is complete pants on these aspects of the IET fleet.
 

Ashley Hill

Established Member
Joined
8 Dec 2019
Messages
5,674
Location
The West Country
Just how big is the “business types on expenses” market? Many companies have a standard class only travel policy.

As an example, I went to a meeting in Amsterdam last year which was attended by the CFO. No first class travel there: she’d flown over on easyJet.
The majority of passengers who use the dining services generally are those on large saleries or expenses. It's either on their way to or from work,meetings or entertaining clients and they are willing to pay for this service. For others it's the convieniance or experience of on board dining.
 

coppercapped

Established Member
Joined
13 Sep 2015
Messages
3,334
Location
Reading
The majority of passengers who use the dining services generally are those on large saleries or expenses. It's either on their way to or from work,meetings or entertaining clients and they are willing to pay for this service.
Are these statements based on fact, in other words on published data which has been verified?
For others it's the convieniance or experience of on board dining.
Isn't that part of the reason the service is offered to potential customers? To make train travel more attractive?
 

Private Baxter

Established Member
Joined
22 Sep 2013
Messages
1,804
I'm about to do a hot take (pun not intended), so be aware!

Obviously, I love the idea of hot food and some nice dining on a train, but I don't see it making much economic sense in a way.

Many passengers just want to get from A to B as fast and cheaply as possible. If that means stopping off at pret or WhSmith for some Coffee and a sandwich to eat on the train, so be it. Some want a bit more comfort and quiet to work in, so pay for first class. Yes, some want warm food on the train, but frankly it probably isn't enough to warrant all the space needed for a kitchen.

Right now, the limiting factors for UK rail is mostly capacity, not hot food provision. Until this is resolved, I don't see the food situation getting any better.

Plus, modern stock is expensive, built for high speed, bi-mode operation and getting from A to B asap. That seems to be the priority over interior comforts. If carriages weren't so darn expensive, perhaps more space would be given to dining. But for now, if that space can be used for seats that will be filled with a quite high capacity factor, that seems to be the way forward.

It's a bit like a conversation I had with someone on Facebook the other day about big planes such as the A380 and 747. I too like them and would love to see more, however the future is 777's, A350's and crossing the Atlantic in a narrowbody. It's boring, and definitely not as good, but that's just the economics of the industry :|
I don't alltogether disagree, which is no doubt one reason why such provisions are not available on routes such as Bristols and Cardiffs. But I have always felt the far west country routes offer a slightly different type of service, and typically attract a different type of traveller, and on those I think a Pullman is well justified, but it has always been for an added first class experience, rather than for any profit. Of course for those who do not wish to dine, there are plenty of other first class seats available, as the restaurant itself is quite small. Whilst I would love to see Swansea services offer Pullman lunch and dinner (Dinner on the 18.15 Carmarthen first stop Bristol Parkway), I realise this is more a fantasy, but could the kitchens nonetheless be put to some reasonable use on other routes? They are, I am told, exceptionally good kitchens after all!
 

RailWonderer

Established Member
Joined
25 Jul 2018
Messages
2,219
Location
All around the network
Like most people I believe the kitchens on 5 cars are a major waste of space given how few services have Pullman dining. It wouldn't be hard to diagram 9 car sets with kitchens to Pullmans and get rid of them on 5 car 800s.
But it begs the question - is there a market for more services to have Pullman dining? I think on some morning services out of London it could definitely work given the loadings and affuence of passengers at those times.
 

Geoff DC

Member
Joined
27 Jan 2018
Messages
242
Location
Penzance
Maybe we could have cook it yourself in 1st Class driving car & the mixed 1st & 3rd in the 2nd car turned into:- Standard should be correctly named as 4th or premium 5th & 1st correctly named as Premium 3rd or steerage plus
 

Mogz

On Moderation
Joined
20 May 2019
Messages
636
Maybe we could have cook it yourself in 1st Class driving car & the mixed 1st & 3rd in the 2nd car turned into:- Standard should be correctly named as 4th or premium 5th & 1st correctly named as Premium 3rd or steerage plus

In reality, there are far more classes on British trains.

It should be something like this:

1st Class = First Class on LNER and Avanti West Coast (2+1 seating and hot meals as part of the offer).

2nd Class = First Class on, for example, GWR, with 2+1 seating and snacks/sandwiches as part of the offer).

3rd Class = First Class on, for example, TPE, Greater Anglia and Chiltern Business Zone with 2+1 seating but no inclusive catering.

4th Class = First Class with 2+2 seating which is nevertheless more comfortable than Standard Class on the same train (eg SWR Class 444s, LNWR Class 350s).

5th Class = Standard Class 2+2 seats with decent leg-room and/or comfort such as Mk3s with IC70 seats, Mk5As, IET/Azumas, TfW, and EMR 158s, SWR 159s, EMR 222s, XC HSTs, LNER and EMR HSTs, TPE 185s. Also daft pseudo-first class on, for example, Southern Railway that is the same seating type as Standard but in a separate compartment.

6th Class = Standard Class 2+2 seats with poor leg room and/or uncomfortable seats (eg Class 153s, GWR Electrostars with ironing board seats, CrossCountry Voyagers etc).

7th Class = Standard Class 3+2 with decent leg-room (eg SWR Class 450s).

8th Class = Standard Class 3+2 with loot leg room or bus seats (eg some 150s, Pacers).

9th Class = Merseyrail Pacers with 3+2 low backed seating and leg room that could only be comfortable to small children and the vertically challenged.

10th Class = Standing.

Discuss!
 

HamworthyGoods

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2019
Messages
4,485
It wouldn't be hard to diagram 9 car sets with kitchens to Pullmans and get rid of them on 5 car 800s.

It wouldn’t be hard but would need someone to buy extra trains. The majority of dining services are on West Country services, as has been outlined many times before DfT chose half-hourly Cornwall services over full length IETs to Penzance so how would this work if only 9 cars has kitchens?
 

jimm

Established Member
Joined
6 Apr 2012
Messages
5,279
Like most people I believe the kitchens on 5 cars are a major waste of space given how few services have Pullman dining. It wouldn't be hard to diagram 9 car sets with kitchens to Pullmans and get rid of them on 5 car 800s.
But it begs the question - is there a market for more services to have Pullman dining? I think on some morning services out of London it could definitely work given the loadings and affuence of passengers at those times.

Most people? Do you have a properly conducted opinion poll with a large sample of people to indicate that is the case? Didn't think so...

In case you haven't noticed, the 5-car sets for TPE and Hull trains have kitchen areas that are a whole one window bay shorter than on the GWR and LNER five-car sets. There still needs to be somewhere to have hot water boilers and microwaves, store the food and drink supplies for trolleys, etc.

As I noted above, if a future operator in the GW area wanted to do something like the LNER/Avanti first class food offer, then they would need a kitchen - which was a large part of the DfT's thinking when it specified the kitchens in the IEP orders in the first place. Taking them out would cost a packet and put trains out of action for a long time - as would putting them back.

Morning services heading out of London are far quieter than those coming in. When GWR was offering Travelling Chef on a fair number of trains, it was almost all inbound in the weekday peaks and Saturday mornings, with the crews serving brunch on their way home in mid to late morning. So GWR has plenty of background knowledge about what will and will not work from that experience - especially as it lost a packet, which was why Travelling Chef was stopped.

As for affluence being a factor in Pullman dining take-up, I can't say I am particularly affluent but have had the odd Pullman lunch down the years - and the people dining at that time of the day are certainly not all business types in suits.
 

Private Baxter

Established Member
Joined
22 Sep 2013
Messages
1,804
Like most people I believe the kitchens on 5 cars are a major waste of space given how few services have Pullman dining. It wouldn't be hard to diagram 9 car sets with kitchens to Pullmans and get rid of them on 5 car 800s.
But it begs the question - is there a market for more services to have Pullman dining? I think on some morning services out of London it could definitely work given the loadings and affuence of passengers at those times.
Unfortunately I don't think there is much demand for morning Pullmans out of London. Currently there is only one mid-morning dining service, offering brunch on the 10.48 to Swansea as a return working for the 05.58 up service. This service, though supposedly growing, is never particularly full. There had also been a brunch service on the 10.06 to Penzance, a return working of a second breakfast service from Plymouth, though both now withdrawn.
Most people? Do you have a properly conducted opinion poll with a large sample of people to indicate that is the case? Didn't think so...
I think it is obvious he has not carried out a survey, but was merely reflecting what others (including me) have said about kitchens on 5 car 800s being wasteful as they never get used. Not an unreasonable comment.
 

jimm

Established Member
Joined
6 Apr 2012
Messages
5,279
I think it is obvious he has not carried out a survey, but was merely reflecting what others (including me) have said about kitchens on 5 car 800s being wasteful as they never get used. Not an unreasonable comment.

It is indeed obvious - but forum posts are not any proof that 'most people' think anything either.

I repeat, the kitchen areas do get used - there are other things in there apart from ovens, or did you miss that bit?

Are the TPE and HT sets unwasteful, as they have room for half-a-dozen more seats by taking out a third of the kitchen space? Or are they also wasteful, as they aren't going to be offering Pullman dining either?
 

Ashley Hill

Established Member
Joined
8 Dec 2019
Messages
5,674
Location
The West Country
I repeat, the kitchen areas do get used - there are other things in there apart from ovens, or did you miss that bit?
Yes,a toaster,microwave (handy for your lunch),2 big ovens and a four ring hob. The only things used on normal services are the fridges for drinks and sandwiches, coffee machine and boiler and finally the cupboard area for the Atlas carts. Add to that the large sinks ,worktop and staff lockers inc. the ones for the cleaning materials and EPOS. That's a lot of stuff!
 

HowardGWR

Established Member
Joined
30 Jan 2013
Messages
4,981
Isn't the first class kitchen not better designed between first and second to provide a barrier to steerage and thus a valued component of the train for first class pax? Such a positioning also thus helps to keep the first class loos cleaner?
 

LA50041

Established Member
Joined
20 Feb 2017
Messages
3,198
Isn't the first class kitchen not better designed between first and second to provide a barrier to steerage and thus a valued component of the train for first class pax? Such a positioning also thus helps to keep the first class loos cleaner?
That would result in a large loss of capacity though. I’m sure that the area where the kitchen is can’t be used for passenger accommodation
 

Devonian

Member
Joined
10 Sep 2019
Messages
219
Location
Totnes
Many companies have a standard class only travel policy.
Indeed I worked for such a company: but the advantage of the Pullman is that it is not part of the first class offering, so I travelled with a standard class ticket and used my not very good company meal allowance to subsidise a very good meal in the Pullman. That kept everyone happy.

Isn't the first class kitchen not better designed between first and second
I often wondered about this too, as it would also make it easier to provide a better catering service for standard class: but I suppose that it reduces the flexibility to change the capacity of first class in the future if there is a very expensively fixed barrier between the classes.

And there would still be a need to allow passengers to pass between first and standard. Since I can't see any British rail company wanting passengers to be able to walk through the galley as they can on Spanish AVE services (and I wouldn't want to barge past a chef wielding a sharp knife or hot pan as we bounce over the Berks and Hants), you would need to allow for a corridor down the side: that would either reduce the space in the kitchen or force the controversial kitchens to be even longer.

So if GWR have to live with a kitchen on every train, the question is really how they could be used creatively. With a captive audience on long journeys on the Cornwall-London corridor and a lack of branches of Pret/M&S at all but the largest stations, it ought to be possible to develop - and properly market - a decent food service for more passengers on more trains, and not just first class or Pullmans. The seemingly impossible trick is to make it a more attractive option than a stale sarnie from Smith's, and then make sure people know about it. Railway catering shouldn't be about a bare minimum: it should be actively desirable.

The 'fast and cheap' customer who buys snacks before boarding is a case in point. At the most basic level, if people knew for certain that they could take advantage of reliable, good catering on board, and they could save themselves precious minutes before boarding by not queueing for a decent coffee or a sandwich at or near the station, then you could make a good start at driving demand (and revenue) on board.

Once on board, trolleys supposedly help drive demand better than a buffet car many carriages away (even if their offering is not as good) because they are visible and actively parade the goods in front of the customer. By contrast (in every way), the few times I bought food from the Travelling Chef caused people around me to be surprised when they saw what I was eating: they simply didn't know the service was there; and likewise people who travel by train regularly are outright astonished when I tell them of meals in the Pullman.

Other countries manage online ordering of hot food at reasonable cost via the train's wi-fi, delivered to the seat. Whether by accident or by design, the UK's rail companies have damped down demand so we have an intermittent trolley service of cold snacks and warm drinks in a random half of a ten-coach train while two kitchens stand empty. There's definitely a problem, but I'm not sure it's the kitchens.
 

Private Baxter

Established Member
Joined
22 Sep 2013
Messages
1,804
It is indeed obvious - but forum posts are not any proof that 'most people' think anything either.

I repeat, the kitchen areas do get used - there are other things in there apart from ovens, or did you miss that bit?

Are the TPE and HT sets unwasteful, as they have room for half-a-dozen more seats by taking out a third of the kitchen space? Or are they also wasteful, as they aren't going to be offering Pullman dining either?
No, I didn't miss that bit. I am well aware of what the kitchens contain, as well as their use as a crew area. I am saying that it is a shame that all that equipment gets lugged around all day for no good reason. I would love to see them used more and to their full potential.
Indeed I worked for such a company: but the advantage of the Pullman is that it is not part of the first class offering, so I travelled with a standard class ticket and used my not very good company meal allowance to subsidise a very good meal in the Pullman. That kept everyone happy.


I often wondered about this too, as it would also make it easier to provide a better catering service for standard class: but I suppose that it reduces the flexibility to change the capacity of first class in the future if there is a very expensively fixed barrier between the classes.

And there would still be a need to allow passengers to pass between first and standard. Since I can't see any British rail company wanting passengers to be able to walk through the galley as they can on Spanish AVE services (and I wouldn't want to barge past a chef wielding a sharp knife or hot pan as we bounce over the Berks and Hants), you would need to allow for a corridor down the side: that would either reduce the space in the kitchen or force the controversial kitchens to be even longer.

So if GWR have to live with a kitchen on every train, the question is really how they could be used creatively. With a captive audience on long journeys on the Cornwall-London corridor and a lack of branches of Pret/M&S at all but the largest stations, it ought to be possible to develop - and properly market - a decent food service for more passengers on more trains, and not just first class or Pullmans. The seemingly impossible trick is to make it a more attractive option than a stale sarnie from Smith's, and then make sure people know about it. Railway catering shouldn't be about a bare minimum: it should be actively desirable.

The 'fast and cheap' customer who buys snacks before boarding is a case in point. At the most basic level, if people knew for certain that they could take advantage of reliable, good catering on board, and they could save themselves precious minutes before boarding by not queueing for a decent coffee or a sandwich at or near the station, then you could make a good start at driving demand (and revenue) on board.

Once on board, trolleys supposedly help drive demand better than a buffet car many carriages away (even if their offering is not as good) because they are visible and actively parade the goods in front of the customer. By contrast (in every way), the few times I bought food from the Travelling Chef caused people around me to be surprised when they saw what I was eating: they simply didn't know the service was there; and likewise people who travel by train regularly are outright astonished when I tell them of meals in the Pullman.

Other countries manage online ordering of hot food at reasonable cost via the train's wi-fi, delivered to the seat. Whether by accident or by design, the UK's rail companies have damped down demand so we have an intermittent trolley service of cold snacks and warm drinks in a random half of a ten-coach train while two kitchens stand empty. There's definitely a problem, but I'm not sure it's the kitchens.
I coudn't agree more. The kitchens themselves are apparently some of the best, and it a shame to see them currently largely unused. I hope a decent catering offering can be created, even if it isn't necessarily Pullman, although I do wonder if Pullman can be extended to Swansea services as well? As for standard class catering, ok the buffet has gone, rightly or wrongly, that was the decision, whilst its substitute doesn't offer the same quality service in my opinion, and it seems GWR are reluctant to explore options with it. But ordering via an app could potentially be successful, though they would have to get round a few logistical issues first.
 

Ashley Hill

Established Member
Joined
8 Dec 2019
Messages
5,674
Location
The West Country
Isn't the first class kitchen not better designed between first and second to provide a barrier to steerage and thus a valued component of the train for first class pax? Such a positioning also thus helps to keep the first class loos cleaner?
This was ideal on HSTs ,however such a narrow passageway past the kitchen area would not be allowed under the disability laws. Remember,you may have to evacuate through it.
 
Joined
7 Jan 2009
Messages
1,031
The DfT did not let anyone off that contract - it wasn’t their decision. That was the deal struck when the franchise was let. It was up to FG to exercise the option - it was effectively a one way bet for FG!

Hopefully for the last time on this forum, the 800 and 802 units have had the same larger 1550L tanks fitted since entry into service and likewise all their engines have been set at 700kw (940hp). If you are using wiki as your source on this, it is complete pants on these aspects of the IET fleet.

I stand corrected. Even the C802 vehicle owner seems a little unclear on the question of the spec differences.
https://eversholtrail.co.uk/fleet/class-802/
 

jimm

Established Member
Joined
6 Apr 2012
Messages
5,279
No, I didn't miss that bit. I am well aware of what the kitchens contain, as well as their use as a crew area. I am saying that it is a shame that all that equipment gets lugged around all day for no good reason. I would love to see them used more and to their full potential.

I coudn't agree more. The kitchens themselves are apparently some of the best, and it a shame to see them currently largely unused. I hope a decent catering offering can be created, even if it isn't necessarily Pullman, although I do wonder if Pullman can be extended to Swansea services as well? As for standard class catering, ok the buffet has gone, rightly or wrongly, that was the decision, whilst its substitute doesn't offer the same quality service in my opinion, and it seems GWR are reluctant to explore options with it. But ordering via an app could potentially be successful, though they would have to get round a few logistical issues first.

GWR gave an intermediate-type hot food offer available to all passengers a good run in the form of Travelling Chef. It lost money for a number of years, was shut down and is not coming back.

The services where extra Pullmans were added in the past few years were carefully chosen to maximise seats filled and revenue earned as a result in the restaurant section - e.g. the early morning South Wales to London breakfast Pullman - but most GWR longer-distance passengers, especially leaving London in late afternoon and early evening, are making journeys that will get them home in time to eat there, so I'm afraid that pricey Pullman dinners would not find many takers.

I stand corrected. Even the C802 vehicle owner seems a little unclear on the question of the spec differences.
https://eversholtrail.co.uk/fleet/class-802/

They just haven't updated that page any time recently, as is clear from the tense used in the last sentence of the description

These trains will be maintained by Hitachi
 

Taunton

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Aug 2013
Messages
12,321
The "Western" have plenty of form in doing this. Around 1960 they bought 100 3-car Cross-Country units (later classes 119 and 120), all of which came with buffets in the centre car. I never saw them used as such, ever, for the whole 30 year life of the vehicles.
 

Rhydgaled

Established Member
Joined
25 Nov 2010
Messages
4,861
It wouldn’t be hard but would need someone to buy extra trains. The majority of dining services are on West Country services, as has been outlined many times before DfT chose half-hourly Cornwall services over full length IETs to Penzance so how would this work if only 9 cars has kitchens?
How many diagrams are required to run the hourly Paddington-Plymouth/Penzance fasts (which I assume include the Pullman services)?

So if GWR have to live with a kitchen on every train, the question is really how they could be used creatively. With a captive audience on long journeys on the Cornwall-London corridor and a lack of branches of Pret/M&S at all but the largest stations, it ought to be possible to develop - and properly market - a decent food service for more passengers on more trains, and not just first class or Pullmans. The seemingly impossible trick is to make it a more attractive option than a stale sarnie from Smith's, and then make sure people know about it. Railway catering shouldn't be about a bare minimum: it should be actively desirable.

The 'fast and cheap' customer who buys snacks before boarding is a case in point. At the most basic level, if people knew for certain that they could take advantage of reliable, good catering on board, and they could save themselves precious minutes before boarding by not queueing for a decent coffee or a sandwich at or near the station, then you could make a good start at driving demand (and revenue) on board.
I agree, particularly that 'railway catering should be actively desirable'. If passengers could rely on getting a decent breakfast or evening meal on board that would be a hugely helpful service which could help attract passengers to the railway. If making a long journey across Britain to start a holiday, it may well be too late to find an evening meal by the time you reach your destination. Going to bed without a nice cooked meal isn't a great way to start a holiday. This is a service that should be available to standard class passengers, ideally with a menu that is not too fancy so that it can be priced at a level the majority of standard class passengers can consider affordable, not just in first. The difficultly is either keeping passenger's seats and luggage safe so that they can get to a buffet to buy food or finding a way of providing an at-seat hot food service throughout the train without excessive staffing costs.
 

Mogz

On Moderation
Joined
20 May 2019
Messages
636
And look how wide those connections are on modern stock.
That narrow passage in the HSTs would not be permitted on new trains where there is public access.

The new Mk5 sleepers are side corridor stock, are they not? How does the width of the corridor compare to the kitchen corridor on an HST?
 

paul1609

Established Member
Joined
28 Jan 2006
Messages
7,992
Location
K
How many diagrams are required to run the hourly Paddington-Plymouth/Penzance fasts (which I assume include the Pullman services)?

I agree, particularly that 'railway catering should be actively desirable'. If passengers could rely on getting a decent breakfast or evening meal on board that would be a hugely helpful service which could help attract passengers to the railway. If making a long journey across Britain to start a holiday, it may well be too late to find an evening meal by the time you reach your destination. Going to bed without a nice cooked meal isn't a great way to start a holiday. This is a service that should be available to standard class passengers, ideally with a menu that is not too fancy so that it can be priced at a level the majority of standard class passengers can consider affordable, not just in first. The difficultly is either keeping passenger's seats and luggage safe so that they can get to a buffet to buy food or finding a way of providing an at-seat hot food service throughout the train without excessive staffing costs.
Out of interest before I reply what do you consider to be the "affordable price range" for such a meal?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top