Tetchytyke
Veteran Member
I dread to think how much it has cost keeping Brady alive for the last 50 odd years.
He's wanted to die for the last 50 years and, for that reason alone, it was worth every penny.
I dread to think how much it has cost keeping Brady alive for the last 50 odd years.
The only reason that he was force fed is because he was deemed mentally ill.
I dread to think how much it has cost keeping Brady alive for the last 50 odd years.
keeping Moors Murderer Ian Brady incarcerated for the last 50 years has cost the tax-payer some £14m.
I don't go along with the ridiculous assertion that it's better to keep him alive at massive cost, should have been topped at the earliest opportunity.
Who knows? In Brady's warped mind he might have liked the idea of still being in the news after he's gone.
The only reason that he was force fed is because he was deemed mentally ill.
But even if it hadn't, who's to say death row would have been cheaper? The US system costs almost double, on average, for a death row prisoner.
But doesn't "bad" basically imply "mad"? Obviously most people don't kill and most of those even slightly tempted are deterred by the severe penalties if you are caught. Not just prison, but the effect of your life in general. So if you go ahead and kill despite the significant barriers then chances are you are defective in some way.
Murder is just something we have to accept, unless there is a technological breakthrough in terms of being able to reprogram people's brains as a child and thus preventing people's need or desire to kill.
Are you saying that to murder you must be mad ?
Are you saying that to murder you must be mad ?
Certainly at the time of killing you must be crazy for the reasons stated above. Of course there are "moments of madness" where normally "sane" people temporarily behave irrationally.
So all terrorists are mad then ? it's a fact that some people simply enjoy killing, they aren't mentally ill and not even suffering a "moment of madness"
But what about the risk of being caught? It is hell of a risk, a risk too great for most people, therefore irrational.
So all terrorists are mad then ? it's a fact that some people simply enjoy killing, they aren't mentally ill and not even suffering a "moment of madness"
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/each-uk-murder-costs-society-1-8-million-says-treasury-1448984
I don't go along with the ridiculous assertion that it's better to keep him alive at massive cost, should have been topped at the earliest opportunity.
although plenty of killers will be mentally deranged plenty won't be.
There was something uniquely evil about Brady and Hindley, that entered the in the psyche of the British people in that era (the 60's). To me it was reading the news reports of Detectives openly crying in court, as the last moments of 10 year old Leslie Ann Downey's life were played out on audio tape. Brady's controlling nature over Hindley, and later over the families of the victims, who wanted to find the remains of their loved ones, so as to give them a proper funeral, just re-inforced the evil in him.
Ironically Brady is the reason that I would never support the re-introduction of the death penalty. He had wanted to die for a long time. He refused food and was force fed for many years. He could not control his own final destiny, as he had controlled so many other aspects of his perverted past. It must have been absolute torture for him not to be able to be in control of that last part of his life, a part where he wanted to choose to die on his own terms. I am glad he was denied that choice. I am glad his last years were a personal hell for him. It was the least that could have happened to him. I don't believe in an after life so his suffering, unlike the family of Keith Bennett, has ended. I'm just glad that he did suffer at the end.
It's interesting to conjecture - if Hindley had never met Brady would she have gone on to have an unremarkable life as an ordinary Lancashire housewife?
Hindley was a willing participant and I believe she attempted to recruit her own brother into their web of evil.It's interesting to conjecture - if Hindley had never met Brady would she have gone on to have an unremarkable life as an ordinary Lancashire housewife?
It's interesting to conjecture - if Hindley had never met Brady would she have gone on to have an unremarkable life as an ordinary Lancashire housewife?
It's not his name we should remember.
These are the names we should remember
Pauline Reade
John Kilbride
Keith Bennett
Lesley Ann Downey
Edward Evans
From what I found it was Brady after the death of John Straffen in 2007,who by then had served 55 years.Brady had been in custody since 1966. I was trying to look up who has been inside the longest now. Possibly it is Donald Neilson - banged up in 1976.
Sadly, the coroner has no legal right to enforce his request.
In the end, Brady can have his last laugh at the expense of the families.
If the site of his ashes is made public, I for one will feel the need to relieve myself each time I pass that way.
The body has now been released and decency has prevailed and the ashes will not be spread on Saddleworth Moor. Maybe they could be buried in the grounds of Ashworth and he can stay there forever?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-39965466
I think the Government should have done a deal with Ian Brady; show us where the body of Keith Bennett is and we will discharge you from the hospital. Yes it would have given Ian Brady what he wanted but at least Keith Bennett's family would have been able to give him a decent burial.
I agree, on the proviso that when the body was found the "deal" was immediately cancelled