• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Ian Brady has died

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

AlterEgo

Verified Rep - Wingin' It! Paul Lucas
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
29,352
Location
LBK
The only reason that he was force fed is because he was deemed mentally ill.

I dread to think how much it has cost keeping Brady alive for the last 50 odd years.

Money well spent if it was denying him the choice of death. Absolute coward.
 

Tetchytyke

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Sep 2013
Messages
17,509
Location
Isle of Man
I don't go along with the ridiculous assertion that it's better to keep him alive at massive cost, should have been topped at the earliest opportunity.

Luckily the death penalty was abolished.

But even if it hadn't, who's to say death row would have been cheaper? The US system costs almost double, on average, for a death row prisoner.

Who knows? In Brady's warped mind he might have liked the idea of still being in the news after he's gone.

Nobody really knows. But I seriously doubt he's told his solicitor anything. Truthfully, I don't think he knew what he did with Keith's body; if he had, he'd have said years ago, like he did with all the others.
 

radamfi

Established Member
Joined
29 Oct 2009
Messages
9,267
The only reason that he was force fed is because he was deemed mentally ill.

But doesn't​ "bad" basically imply "mad"? Obviously most people don't kill and most of those even slightly tempted are deterred by the severe penalties if you are caught. Not just prison, but the effect of your life in general. So if you go ahead and kill despite the significant barriers then chances are you are defective in some way.

Murder is just something we have to accept, unless there is a technological breakthrough in terms of being able to reprogram people's​ brains as a child and thus preventing people's need or desire to kill.
 

me123

Established Member
Joined
9 Jul 2007
Messages
8,510
But even if it hadn't, who's to say death row would have been cheaper? The US system costs almost double, on average, for a death row prisoner.

True, but I'd suspect that Brady would have waived his right to appeal (unless of course he would have wanted the publicity) - but removing the necessary lengthy appeals process would have brought the costs down. That's where the bulk of the cost lies in the US - a long period of higher security detention alongside a lengthy appeals process. Assuming Brady would have relished the thought of death, he'd have been gone within a few years at most.
 

Railops

Member
Joined
14 Apr 2016
Messages
352
But doesn't​ "bad" basically imply "mad"? Obviously most people don't kill and most of those even slightly tempted are deterred by the severe penalties if you are caught. Not just prison, but the effect of your life in general. So if you go ahead and kill despite the significant barriers then chances are you are defective in some way.

Murder is just something we have to accept, unless there is a technological breakthrough in terms of being able to reprogram people's​ brains as a child and thus preventing people's need or desire to kill.

Are you saying that to murder you must be mad ?
 

radamfi

Established Member
Joined
29 Oct 2009
Messages
9,267
Are you saying that to murder you must be mad ?

Certainly at the time of killing you must be crazy for the reasons stated above. Of course there are "moments of madness" where normally "sane" people temporarily behave irrationally.
 

Tetchytyke

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Sep 2013
Messages
17,509
Location
Isle of Man
Are you saying that to murder you must be mad ?

It's interesting, and probably for another thread.

People without problems don't murder. It's known that psychopaths make up 1% of the adult population but up to 25% of the adult prison population (US figures). Narcissists make up another big chunk of the adult prison population too.

They're clearly not "right", but are they mad? And does that mean they're not culpable? It's interesting.
 

Railops

Member
Joined
14 Apr 2016
Messages
352
Certainly at the time of killing you must be crazy for the reasons stated above. Of course there are "moments of madness" where normally "sane" people temporarily behave irrationally.

So all terrorists are mad then ? it's a fact that some people simply enjoy killing, they aren't mentally ill and not even suffering a "moment of madness"
 

radamfi

Established Member
Joined
29 Oct 2009
Messages
9,267
So all terrorists are mad then ? it's a fact that some people simply enjoy killing, they aren't mentally ill and not even suffering a "moment of madness"

But what about the risk of being caught? It is hell of a risk, a risk too great for most people, therefore irrational.
 

Railops

Member
Joined
14 Apr 2016
Messages
352
But what about the risk of being caught? It is hell of a risk, a risk too great for most people, therefore irrational.

Usually is irrational I agree but I maintain that although plenty of killers will be mentally deranged plenty won't be.
 

Antman

Established Member
Joined
3 May 2013
Messages
6,840
So all terrorists are mad then ? it's a fact that some people simply enjoy killing, they aren't mentally ill and not even suffering a "moment of madness"

I think terrorists generally have some misguided notion that what they are doing is right. I'm not a doctor but I would have serious concerns about the sanity of anybody who enjoyed killing people, in fact there's an argument that the likes of Brady, Sutcliffe and Huntley are by definition mad and that no sane person would even contemplate doing what they have done.
 

Tetchytyke

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Sep 2013
Messages
17,509
Location
Isle of Man
although plenty of killers will be mentally deranged plenty won't be.

It depends what you mean by "mentally deranged".

Narcissists will kill if they don't get their own way or believe in their rightness, and psychopaths will kill because they don't care or they enjoy it. Are they sane? Are they mentally deranged? There's no simple answer.

The law doesn't consider people with personality disorders to be "deranged", and so they'll be tried as sane people. But then personality disorders are recognised mental health conditions, so...
 

kylemore

Member
Joined
28 Aug 2010
Messages
1,047
There was something uniquely evil about Brady and Hindley, that entered the in the psyche of the British people in that era (the 60's). To me it was reading the news reports of Detectives openly crying in court, as the last moments of 10 year old Leslie Ann Downey's life were played out on audio tape. Brady's controlling nature over Hindley, and later over the families of the victims, who wanted to find the remains of their loved ones, so as to give them a proper funeral, just re-inforced the evil in him.

Ironically Brady is the reason that I would never support the re-introduction of the death penalty. He had wanted to die for a long time. He refused food and was force fed for many years. He could not control his own final destiny, as he had controlled so many other aspects of his perverted past. It must have been absolute torture for him not to be able to be in control of that last part of his life, a part where he wanted to choose to die on his own terms. I am glad he was denied that choice. I am glad his last years were a personal hell for him. It was the least that could have happened to him. I don't believe in an after life so his suffering, unlike the family of Keith Bennett, has ended. I'm just glad that he did suffer at the end.

It's interesting to conjecture - if Hindley had never met Brady would she have gone on to have an unremarkable life as an ordinary Lancashire housewife?
 

backontrack

Established Member
Joined
2 Feb 2014
Messages
6,399
Location
The UK
Absolute sc*m. The absolute s**t of the planet. I hope he burns for eternity.
 
Last edited:

backontrack

Established Member
Joined
2 Feb 2014
Messages
6,399
Location
The UK
It's interesting to conjecture - if Hindley had never met Brady would she have gone on to have an unremarkable life as an ordinary Lancashire housewife?

No matter how much pressure you're under - you don't just do something like that.
 

furnessvale

Established Member
Joined
14 Jul 2015
Messages
4,901
It's interesting to conjecture - if Hindley had never met Brady would she have gone on to have an unremarkable life as an ordinary Lancashire housewife?
Hindley was a willing participant and I believe she attempted to recruit her own brother into their web of evil.

She certainly used to have a good laugh after each visit from that milksop Longford when she was in Durham.
 

ChiefPlanner

Established Member
Joined
6 Sep 2011
Messages
8,318
Location
Herts
It's interesting to conjecture - if Hindley had never met Brady would she have gone on to have an unremarkable life as an ordinary Lancashire housewife?

By some accounts , she was considering joining the Police before meeting Brady.
 

cjmillsnun

Established Member
Joined
13 Feb 2011
Messages
3,275
It's not his name we should remember.

These are the names we should remember
Pauline Reade
John Kilbride
Keith Bennett
Lesley Ann Downey
Edward Evans
 

Strathclyder

Established Member
Joined
12 Jun 2013
Messages
3,824
Location
Clydebank
As others have already pointed out, it is immeasurably tragic that the location of Keith Bennett's body was never disclosed by Brady and is now unlikely ever to be found. Cannot begin to even imagine the torment the family has had to endure for so long...

Brady was the physical embodiment of pure, irredeemable evil. I sincerely hope that he rots for all eternity.
 
Last edited:

Strathclyder

Established Member
Joined
12 Jun 2013
Messages
3,824
Location
Clydebank
It's not his name we should remember.

These are the names we should remember
Pauline Reade
John Kilbride
Keith Bennett
Lesley Ann Downey
Edward Evans

Precisely. The children are the ones who should be remembered here, not the creature that robbed them of life with such cruelty, depravity & sadism.
 
Last edited:

UpTheFront

Member
Joined
8 Feb 2017
Messages
12
Location
Welwyn GC
Brady had been in custody since 1966. I was trying to look up who has been inside the longest now. Possibly it is Donald Neilson - banged up in 1976.
From what I found it was Brady after the death of John Straffen in 2007,who by then had served 55 years.
Brady was the current longest serving prisoner with 51 years inside.
 

scarby

Member
Joined
20 May 2011
Messages
888
It is grossly simplistic to say it has cost "the taxpayer" £14 million to keep Ian Brady alive - as it is whenever newspapers use this term about anything (including railway matters, sometimes).

Firstly it hasn't "cost" the taxpayer anything. It will have come out of money budgeted for prisons, etc. Their tax bill would have been just the same even if Ian Brady had never existed.

The overwhelming majority of those costs would be fixed costs such as paying permanent staff and so on.

Finally, the money doesn't just vanish, as stuff such as wages is recycled back into the economy when spent. In fact, a prison almost certainly boosts the local economy in some ways.

Obviously in an ideal world it would be great if the resources could be used for something else, but we haven't progressed to the stage of crime-free society yet, so prisons and so on need to exist.
 

Antman

Established Member
Joined
3 May 2013
Messages
6,840
Sadly, the coroner has no legal right to enforce his request.

In the end, Brady can have his last laugh at the expense of the families.

If the site of his ashes is made public, I for one will feel the need to relieve myself each time I pass that way.

The body has now been released and decency has prevailed and the ashes will not be spread on Saddleworth Moor. Maybe they could be buried in the grounds of Ashworth and he can stay there forever?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-39965466
 

Cowley

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
15 Apr 2016
Messages
18,898
Location
Devon
Reminds me, I must pick up some cat litter from the shop later.
 

cf111

Established Member
Joined
13 Nov 2012
Messages
1,393
I think the Government should have done a deal with Ian Brady; show us where the body of Keith Bennett is and we will discharge you from the hospital. Yes it would have given Ian Brady what he wanted but at least Keith Bennett's family would have been able to give him a decent burial.

I agree, on the proviso that when the body was found the "deal" was immediately cancelled, Brady arrested, tried and convicted of Keith Bennett's murder (he was only ever convicted of murdering Edward Evans, Lesley Ann Downey and John Kilbride) before being carted back to Ashworth again.
 
Last edited:

Darandio

Established Member
Joined
24 Feb 2007
Messages
11,131
Location
Redcar
I agree, on the proviso that when the body was found the "deal" was immediately cancelled

Imagine trying that one today though. He's take legal action and he'd win, such is the way our system works.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top