• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Huge Expansion in Scotrail services planned

Status
Not open for further replies.

Altnabreac

Established Member
Joined
20 Apr 2013
Messages
2,425
Location
Salt & Vinegar
Big news for additional Scotrail services:

Headline new services:
  • Hourly service Inverness - Perth (2 hourly alternates to Glasgow / Edinburgh)
  • Inverness - Elgin hourly local service
  • "Aberdeen Crossrail" hourly Montrose - Inverurie service
  • Many Inverness - Glasgow/Edinburgh via Aberdeen HST services
  • "Dundee Crossrail" hourly service to Arbroath calling at Broughty Ferry, Monifieth and Carnoustie.
  • Hourly Dundee semi fast service to Glasgow allowing HST services to run faster.
  • Half hourly Glasgow - Edinburgh via Cumbernauld service.
  • 4tph Glasgow - Cumbernauld
  • Hourly Borders Rail - Fife service operated by 170s

Lots of new services and a definite emphasis on removing stops from InterCity services to reduce journey times.

‘Rail revolution’ means 200 more services and 20,000 more seats for Scots passengers
Transport Minister, Derek Mackay, today announced a “revolution in rail” in Scotland, which will deliver the largest programme of benefits to rail passengers seen in a generation.

ScotRail will introduce 200 new services, providing 20,000 more seats per day, with passengers across Tayside, Stirlingshire, Perthshire, Aberdeenshire and the Borders set to feel the benefits.

This represents a significant enhancement to ScotRail’s current timetable, which currently runs 2,300 services per day.

Timetable improvements are made possible by the decision by the Scottish Government to retain 13 additional Class 170 diesel trains (39 additional carriages) beyond the terms of their current leases, which were due to end on 2018. These extra trains create the capacity to make timetable service improvements – with input supplied by local stakeholders to find the best fit for local priorities.

More rolling stock will allow ScotRail to run more frequent services both for commuters and city to city passengers, whilst the increased flexibility offers significant time savings on popular routes.

From 2018 there will be more services confirmed for Tayside, Stirlingshire, Perthsire Aberdeenshire. There will also be increased peak capacity across Fife and the Borders, relieving some of the pressure on commuter services, along with more commuter options linking local towns between Glasgow and Edinburgh via Cumbernauld and Falkirk.

Transport Minister, Derek Mackay, said:

“We have initiated a revolution in rail services across Scotland. From 2018 passengers will benefit from more seats, more services and faster journey times as a direct result of the increased funding that we are putting into the rail network.

“The retention of these units will complement the arrival of our new High Speed Trains, which will allow for new and improved intercity connections. They will also make our rail network more resilient, creating opportunities to run faster services on key commuter routes and offering better connectivity for regional areas.

“This funding is in addition to the £475m investment in Scotland’s rolling stock over the lifetime of the franchise, meaning Scotland’s rail passengers have never been better served, both in terms of the quality of the trains they travel on, and the number of services running on the network.”

Phil Verster, Managing Director of Abellio ScotRail said:

“This is a really significant moment in our mission to transform Scotland’s railway. In three years time, the service that we provide to our customers will be unrecognisable. Our new electric fleet will be running between Glasgow and Edinburgh, our High Speed trains will be linking our seven cities and, thanks to this announcement today, we will have hundreds more services and thousands more seats available to customers across Scotland – particularly in Aberdeen, the North East and Fife.

“I really cannot overstate just how big a change to our service that this announcement represents. This is not a slight amendment to the way we do business, it is a fundamental change. These new trains will allow us to completely recast our timetables, meaning more regular, local services combined with a high speed intercity offering.

“This transformation means that we can set about delivering on our vision of a railway that connects people with jobs, businesses with customers and communities with the opportunity to grow and prosper. A railway that delivers for Scotland – not just because of what it is, but because of what it allows our country to do.”

Dominic Booth, Managing Director of Abellio UK, said:

“First and foremost today’s major announcement is about delivering for our customers. This investment gets to the heart and soul of how we are working together with Scottish Government to deliver improvements that will see ScotRail powering increased and sustainable economic growth for Scotland as well as delivering benefits for city regions and communities. This is the best railway in the UK and it is getting better".

The improvements have been designed following an early consultation led by ScotRail with input from regional transport partnerships, an arrangement that will continue as plans are progressed.

ENDS


Note to Editors

Key benefits:

Inverness:
• Hourly service to Nairn, Forres and Elgin
• Hourly service alternating between Edinburgh and Glasgow with limited-stop services running south of Perth. Average journey time will be at least 10 minutes shorter than now
• Two hourly Glasgow / Inverness service and an Edinburgh / Inverness services.

Aberdeen:
• Hourly ‘local’ service across the city between Inverurie Montrose, stopping at all stations.
• Additional services to the above to create a half hourly service between Aberdeen and Inverurie. Additional early morning and late evening services to Elgin, Keith, Huntly and Insch
• Hourly limited stop High Speed Train service to both Edinburgh and Glasgow
Many High Speed trains running from Glasgow or Edinburgh will be extended through to Inverness

Dundee:
• Hourly service to Broughty Ferry, Monifieth, Carnoustie and Arbroath
• Half hourly service to Perth, Stirling and Glasgow – one limited stop High Speed Train and one regional service
• Continuation of existing half hourly service to Edinburgh - one limited stop High Speed Train and one regional service

Perth:
• Hourly service to Inverness from Edinburgh in one hour, from Glasgow in the other hour);
• Minimum of an hourly service to Glasgow and Edinburgh (mix of limited stop High Speed Train and one regional service)
• New regional Glasgow – Dundee service provides an hourly service between Glasgow and Stirling, Bridge of Allan, Dunblane, Glaneagles, Perth and Invergowrie.

Edinburgh:
• New standard ‘all day’ timetable to stations in Fife operated by 3-coach class 170 trains
• New through service each hour between Borders railway and Fife. Borders railway primarily operated by 3-coach class 170 trains (X% more seats per train)
• New half hourly service to Glasgow via Cumbernauld, Stepps and Gartcosh
• Current half hourly service to Stirling and Dunblane becomes limited stop rather than all stations, reducing journey times by around 10 minutes

Glasgow:
• Four trains per hour service to Cumbernauld with two operating via Falkirk Grahamston through to Edinburgh
• Hourly service to Dundee reducing journey times to Stirling, Bridge of Allan and Dunblane

Stirling:
• Quicker journeys to / from Glasgow & Edinburgh
• A new hourly service connecting Stirling with more trains to Glasgow, Dundee and Gleneagles.

Borders:
• Typically 20% more seats on majority of services to Midlothian and the Borders.
• Direct hourly connection between Borders Railway and stations in west Edinburgh.

Additional quotes
The Scottish Association for Public Transport (SAPT) welcomed the announcement
of additional ScotRail train services and extra seats from 2018. Faster limited stop InterCity trains will benefit business and leisure travel, while the introduction of new regional train services will vastly improve connectivity at intermediate stations.

Dr. John McCormick, SAPT Chairman, said:
"Our Association has long advocated fast, regular interval train services throughout the Scottish rail network. The new timetables to be introduced by Abellio ScotRail will achieve this, and are a major step towards giving Scotland a world-class rail system."

Ross Martin, Chief Executive of SCDI, said:
“At the time of this contract being let, SCDI pressed for greater connectivity across the network underpinning a realisation of the differentiated needs of key groups of passengers (e.g. InterCity, Commuter and Leisure) who use Scotland's railways.
These enhancements to services are another step in the right direction, shifting the focus more clearly towards the role of the rail network in 'driving economic growth', the central focus of the SCDI membership, and we therefore warmly welcome them".
http://www.transport.gov.scot/news/...e-seats-scots-passengers#sthash.pg5wCjrj.dpuf
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
33,695
Location
Scotland
Big news for additional Scotrail services:

"Dundee Crossrail" hourly service to Arbroath calling at Broughty Ferry, Monifieth and Carnoustie.
Quite interesting - I wonder if this will prompt work on the Dundee West Gateway station (or whatever they're calling it these days).
 

Altnabreac

Established Member
Joined
20 Apr 2013
Messages
2,425
Location
Salt & Vinegar
Quite interesting - I wonder if this will prompt work on the Dundee West Gateway station (or whatever they're calling it these days).

There is specifically a commitment for an hourly service at Invergowrie:

New regional Glasgow – Dundee service provides an hourly service between Glasgow and Stirling, Bridge of Allan, Dunblane, Glaneagles, Perth and Invergowrie.

Until now I understand the sticking point had been Transport Scotland felt Dundee West had to replace Invergowrie while TACTran felt it should be an additional station. Whether this announcement helps resolve that disagreement is not clear.

An hourly service for Dundee West would definitely be possible though if TACTran committed to the move from Invergowrie.
 

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
33,695
Location
Scotland
An hourly service for Dundee West would definitely be possible though if TACTran committed to the move from Invergowrie.
Invergowrie station is only really useful for Invergowrie and Kingoodie, there isn't even decent bus access. Dundee West has the potential to be much more useful for Ninewells and the surrounding area.
 

ld0595

Member
Joined
1 Aug 2014
Messages
672
Location
Glasgow
This is all fantastic news! A new hourly Dundee to Glasgow stopper service is a fantastic addition and the Arbroath to Dundee crossrail will be a good addition to compete with the currently well used 73 bus. There has been a huge gap to provide a stopper service to compete with the very well used but incredibly slow 73, so this is great to hear! I wonder if there will be more stops at Balmossie, Golf street etc or if will these still only get one train a day.
 

JohnR

Member
Joined
23 Jul 2010
Messages
495
There is specifically a commitment for an hourly service at Invergowrie:



Until now I understand the sticking point had been Transport Scotland felt Dundee West had to replace Invergowrie while TACTran felt it should be an additional station. Whether this announcement helps resolve that disagreement is not clear.

An hourly service for Dundee West would definitely be possible though if TACTran committed to the move from Invergowrie.

To be honest, Dundee West (I still say it ought to be called Ninewells) is serving a different market to Invergowrie. Dundee West is about providing access to the Hospital and the nearby Technology Park (major employment centres) while Invergowrie is about allowing local residents access to the rail network.

The solution, it seems to me is to have Dundee West served by local trains, while Invergowrie served by the Glasgow stopper.

Also - how can it be called "Dundee CrossRail", if it terminates in Dundee? Extend it to Perth!
 

Altnabreac

Established Member
Joined
20 Apr 2013
Messages
2,425
Location
Salt & Vinegar
The fact that this announcement was being planned also explains better the new priorities for Scottish Electrification and specifically the queue jumping of Dunblane - Dundee electrification:

It's now Dunblane to Dundee electrification which looks set to be given priority during CP6, with Fife Circle moving to effectively the end of the line, behind even Dundee to Aberdeen.

That approach makes some sense if releasing Class 170 units and replacing them with electric Class 385 (or similar) units cuts down the total operational cost (leasing + maintenance) for fleet or otherwise allows an increase in capacity at lower cost than trying to juggle HST sets, Class 170s and Class 385 units on the Glasgow to Perth/Dundee corridor.

Having a semi fast Glasgow - Dundee service provides a useful service to be converted to electric traction. Electrifying at the same time as signalling replacement here brings back the old "Total Route Modernisation" concept. Equally the new through services from Borders to Fife reduce the benefits of early electrification on the Fife Circle.
 

tbtc

Veteran Member
Joined
16 Dec 2008
Messages
18,058
Location
Reston City Centre
Since most of these improved services are on the non-electrified network, have they kept enough DMUs to allow all of these?

Seems a lot to achieve with just thirteen extra units (though I appreciate that some of these "improvements" are about the extension of existing services, rather than being wholly new).

Great news though :D

Perth:
• Hourly service to Inverness from Edinburgh in one hour

Skim reading, I thought "wow - that's fast"!

(rather than "bi-hourly frequency to Edinburgh" :oops:)

Edinburgh:
• New half hourly service to Glasgow via Cumbernauld, Stepps and Gartcosh
• Current half hourly service to Stirling and Dunblane becomes limited stop rather than all stations, reducing journey times by around 10 minutes

...so the Edinburgh - Dunblane services become limited stop from Waverley to Grahamston, with the Grahamston - Queen Street service extended to start at Edinburgh?

If so, great news - I don't think Cumbernauld has ever had direct public transport to Edinburgh before (coach/ bus/ train)?
 

Altnabreac

Established Member
Joined
20 Apr 2013
Messages
2,425
Location
Salt & Vinegar
To be honest, Dundee West (I still say it ought to be called Ninewells) is serving a different market to Invergowrie. Dundee West is about providing access to the Hospital and the nearby Technology Park (major employment centres) while Invergowrie is about allowing local residents access to the rail network.

The solution, it seems to me is to have Dundee West served by local trains, while Invergowrie served by the Glasgow stopper.

Also - how can it be called "Dundee CrossRail", if it terminates in Dundee? Extend it to Perth!

It was only me who added the Dundee and Aberdeen Crossrail phrases. No mention of that in the Transport Scotland release itself. Essentially though the additional services are similar to the previously proposed Crossrail concepts.

It's all slightly unclear how the new services will interact. Will the Aberdeen - Montrose and Dundee - Arbroath services be entirely independent and not cross the Usan gap?

Will Dundee - Arbroath be an extension of the hourly Glasgow or Edinburgh semi fast service instead?

Will Stonehaven, Laurencekirk, Carnoustie etc lose direct services to Edinburgh / Glasgow with more changes required at Dundee / Montrose?

Lots more detailed needed to answer these questions.
 

JohnR

Member
Joined
23 Jul 2010
Messages
495
Not nearly as much of an employment centre as it used to be, sadly.
*cough*Errol*cough*

Sadly true - but Ninewells Hospital still employs about 6,000, and visitors and patients on top.

Agree about Errol. In my view they ought to build much needed housing there, re-open the station, with a good stopping service into Dundee and Perth. But maybe thats too much joined up thinking.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
It was only me who added the Dundee and Aberdeen Crossrail phrases. No mention of that in the Transport Scotland release itself. Essentially though the additional services are similar to the previously proposed Crossrail concepts.

It's all slightly unclear how the new services will interact. Will the Aberdeen - Montrose and Dundee - Arbroath services be entirely independent and not cross the Usan gap?

Will Dundee - Arbroath be an extension of the hourly Glasgow or Edinburgh semi fast service instead?

Will Stonehaven, Laurencekirk, Carnoustie etc lose direct services to Edinburgh / Glasgow with more changes required at Dundee / Montrose?

Lots more detailed needed to answer these questions.

The Montrose-Inverurie service is, as you say essentially the old Aberdeen CrossRail. The Dundee-Arbroath stopper is new though, as the latest proposal from Tactran had them as an extension of services from Glasgow. Perhaps the timekeeping of the 16.11 from Glasgow QS has made them think twice?

I think they cants link to the two stopping services due to the single line at Usan. But that might change if and when that is upgraded.
 

ld0595

Member
Joined
1 Aug 2014
Messages
672
Location
Glasgow
I think they cants link to the two stopping services due to the single line at Usan. But that might change if and when that is upgraded.

I'm sure I heard somewhere that Usan was going to be double tracked as part of the Aberdeen city deal.
 

Altnabreac

Established Member
Joined
20 Apr 2013
Messages
2,425
Location
Salt & Vinegar
I think they cants link to the two stopping services due to the single line at Usan. But that might change if and when that is upgraded.

Agreed. My guess is that they don't want to link across Dundee for a combination of existing performance pollution reasons and the fact that once Usan is sorted it becomes a Dundee - Inverurie semi fast service that you don't want to extend to Edinburgh or Glasgow as it becomes overly long with commuter stock.

Also makes the business case trickier for electrifying Dunblane - Dundee in the short term.

Could see it extending to Dundee West to give a half hourly Dundee - Dundee West frequency. Wonder if it would be worth building Dundee West as a 3 platform station?
 

Altnabreac

Established Member
Joined
20 Apr 2013
Messages
2,425
Location
Salt & Vinegar
I'm sure I heard somewhere that Usan was going to be double tracked as part of the Aberdeen city deal.

Yes. Technically it wasn't part of the City Deal itself but an associated £254m Infrastructure package, solely funded by the Scottish Government:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-35423953

The issue here is that the new services are set to commence "From 2018" but the Usan redoubling is proposed for the next "5-10 years" so won't be available immediately.
 

Mordac

Established Member
Joined
5 Mar 2016
Messages
2,386
Location
Birmingham
Big news for additional Scotrail services:
[*]Half hourly Glasgow - Edinburgh via Cumbernauld service.
How is this going to work? Reverse at Greenhill? Sounds cumbersome. Or will it go via Falkirk Grahamston and thus require DMU operation?
 

hibtastic

Member
Joined
19 Oct 2014
Messages
288
Great news and fantastic that Fife services will be 170s! Will they operate as 6-Car sets in the peak?

Any more news on a new Dunbar or Berwick service and the reopening of East Linton station. The latest if heard was that they were waiting to have enough rolling stock to cover this.
 
Last edited:

JohnR

Member
Joined
23 Jul 2010
Messages
495
Agreed. My guess is that they don't want to link across Dundee for a combination of existing performance pollution reasons and the fact that once Usan is sorted it becomes a Dundee - Inverurie semi fast service that you don't want to extend to Edinburgh or Glasgow as it becomes overly long with commuter stock.

Also makes the business case trickier for electrifying Dunblane - Dundee in the short term.

Could see it extending to Dundee West to give a half hourly Dundee - Dundee West frequency. Wonder if it would be worth building Dundee West as a 3 platform station?

Extending to Ninewells (As far as I am concerned, Dundee West will always be the old CR station ;)) makes great sense. There maybe space for a third platform face to terminate the stoppers from the east.

There are now beginning to be calls for Dundee to get its own City Region deal - and getting these transport links right will be part of that.
 

Altnabreac

Established Member
Joined
20 Apr 2013
Messages
2,425
Location
Salt & Vinegar
How is this going to work? Reverse at Greenhill? Sounds cumbersome. Or will it go via Falkirk Grahamston and thus require DMU operation?

Cumbernauld - Grahamston will be electrified by December 2018
http://www.transport.gov.scot/project/electrification-programme

Suspect that the December 2018 timetable change is also the proposed start date for all these new services as that is when DMUs become available both from Stirling services being electrified and the HSTs arriving.
 

NotATrainspott

Established Member
Joined
2 Feb 2013
Messages
3,304
How is this going to work? Reverse at Greenhill? Sounds cumbersome. Or will it go via Falkirk Grahamston and thus require DMU operation?

The E&G wires will be in place in December this year. Once they're done the diversionary route from Cumbernauld to Polmont via Falkirk Grahamston will be the priority, so it might be possible to get this completed in time for the new service. Although some of the timetable improvements are due to the extra rolling stock (presumably made possible by the DfT allowing that new order of CAF DMUs, hence the delay in announcement) the vastly superior acceleration of the 385s probably has a lot to do with it as well in the Central Belt.

So it turns out that the people at NR who wrote the Scotland Route Study did actually know what they're on about! Surprise, that. Again it might have something to do with the DMU situation, as it's no longer essential to free up suburban DMUs first. That's what drove the expectation that Fife would be next, since there would be plenty of long distance D(E)MUs for Aberdeen and Inverness services well into the future.

Just putting it out there but focussing on regional and stopping services out of Queen Street might also have something to do with the case for a cross-city tunnel in future. Spending billions on a cross-city tunnel while not increasing the number of electrified services running into Queen Street might not be the best of ideas. If stopping services ran through the tunnel all the way from Perth or Dundee, even if they were just going to the Airport, it would help make the scheme much more palatable as a Scotland-wide project. The Queensferry Crossing works directly affected the whole of Scotland north of the Forth, so it would never find it difficult to get support from the whole country. A cross-city tunnel in Glasgow would face more problems if the benefits seemingly run out at Dunblane.
 

Altnabreac

Established Member
Joined
20 Apr 2013
Messages
2,425
Location
Salt & Vinegar
The E&G wires will be in place in December this year. Once they're done the diversionary route from Cumbernauld to Polmont via Falkirk Grahamston will be the priority, so it might be possible to get this completed in time for the new service. Although some of the timetable improvements are due to the extra rolling stock (presumably made possible by the DfT allowing that new order of CAF DMUs, hence the delay in announcement) the vastly superior acceleration of the 385s probably has a lot to do with it as well in the Central Belt.

So it turns out that the people at NR who wrote the Scotland Route Study did actually know what they're on about! Surprise, that. Again it might have something to do with the DMU situation, as it's no longer essential to free up suburban DMUs first. That's what drove the expectation that Fife would be next, since there would be plenty of long distance D(E)MUs for Aberdeen and Inverness services well into the future.

Just putting it out there but focussing on regional and stopping services out of Queen Street might also have something to do with the case for a cross-city tunnel in future. Spending billions on a cross-city tunnel while not increasing the number of electrified services running into Queen Street might not be the best of ideas. If stopping services ran through the tunnel all the way from Perth or Dundee, even if they were just going to the Airport, it would help make the scheme much more palatable as a Scotland-wide project. The Queensferry Crossing works directly affected the whole of Scotland north of the Forth, so it would never find it difficult to get support from the whole country. A cross-city tunnel in Glasgow would face more problems if the benefits seemingly run out at Dunblane.

Good thoughts. My initial analysis of the routes that could run onto a Glasgow Cross-City tunnel was definitely that you would want to run through to Edinburgh via Falkirk and Dundee via Stirling / Perth.

Other routes north of the Clyde would probably be Alloa / Maryhill / Milngavie / Cumbernauld and maybe Motherwell via Gartcosh.

So electrification would only be needed from Anniesland - Cowlairs and Dundee - Dunblane to achieve this.

This really could be all the ducks in a row for the tunnel to make progress.
 

47421

Member
Joined
7 Feb 2012
Messages
686
Location
london
"Timetable improvements are made possible by the decision by the Scottish Government to retain 13 additional Class 170 diesel trains (39 additional carriages) beyond the terms of their current leases, which were due to end on 2018. "

Who owns these 170s? Was it expected they would stay in Scotland or did other franchisees have their eyes on them post 2018?
 

hibtastic

Member
Joined
19 Oct 2014
Messages
288
"Timetable improvements are made possible by the decision by the Scottish Government to retain 13 additional Class 170 diesel trains (39 additional carriages) beyond the terms of their current leases, which were due to end on 2018. "

Who owns these 170s? Was it expected they would stay in Scotland or did other franchisees have their eyes on them post 2018?

The 170s were supposed to be going I think so it's great that more are staying. I suspect Northern would have had their eyes on some of these.
 

clc

Established Member
Joined
31 Oct 2011
Messages
1,326
So that will be 13tph between Glasgow and Edinburgh over 5 routes with a 6th route being planned. Not too shabby.
 

Altnabreac

Established Member
Joined
20 Apr 2013
Messages
2,425
Location
Salt & Vinegar
The 170s were supposed to be going I think so it's great that more are staying. I suspect Northern would have had their eyes on some of these.

Suspect some might still be able to be released in mid 2020s if wires reach north from Dunblane by that point.
 

clc

Established Member
Joined
31 Oct 2011
Messages
1,326
The fact that this announcement was being planned also explains better the new priorities for Scottish Electrification and specifically the queue jumping of Dunblane - Dundee electrification:



Having a semi fast Glasgow - Dundee service provides a useful service to be converted to electric traction. Electrifying at the same time as signalling replacement here brings back the old "Total Route Modernisation" concept. Equally the new through services from Borders to Fife reduce the benefits of early electrification on the Fife Circle.

Perhaps Fife Circle going to the back of the queue for electrification might also be good news for the Levenmouth re-opening campaign as the business case wouldn't have to include the cost of wiring if they can progress it in the next 5 years or so.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top