Obviously I only expect a VERY ballpark number.
I was just pondering what kind of numbers we are talking about if the UKG/Treasury said
”We accept rolling electrification, we accept your list of priorities, and rather than fund individual projects we will fund the equivalent of X wiring teams (design, infrastructure, wiring, the lot) for ten years and it’s up to you Network Rail to get the most out of them, and keep them working”.
Would Network Rail create its own in such a situation or carry on using contractors?
The second part is based around a hypothetical that the number of teams the government was willing to fund was more than currently exist (at a sensible price). Could they create an “electrification academy” like the tunnelling one in East London and increase the supply in a couple of years? I am guessing that design is the tricky one for that - would that be a postgrad “apprenticeship” type deal?
I was just pondering what kind of numbers we are talking about if the UKG/Treasury said
”We accept rolling electrification, we accept your list of priorities, and rather than fund individual projects we will fund the equivalent of X wiring teams (design, infrastructure, wiring, the lot) for ten years and it’s up to you Network Rail to get the most out of them, and keep them working”.
Would Network Rail create its own in such a situation or carry on using contractors?
The second part is based around a hypothetical that the number of teams the government was willing to fund was more than currently exist (at a sensible price). Could they create an “electrification academy” like the tunnelling one in East London and increase the supply in a couple of years? I am guessing that design is the tricky one for that - would that be a postgrad “apprenticeship” type deal?