Are Chiltern the only TOC who run services which are part DOO, part guard?
Southern run DOO to Dorking, where a Conductor jumps on for the last bit down to Horsham. And the South Croydon to Milton Keynes service is DOO between South Croydon and Clapham Jct. There might be other services, but those are the ones that spring to mind.
Are Chiltern the only TOC who run services which are part DOO, part guard?
Would this route provide a useful comparison of the safety of DOO versus guard protected services?
London Overground is indeed a National Rail train operating company. All staff are trained in National Rail rules, all trains are run to the National Rail standard, all signalling is run by Network Rail. London Overground is a concession. Instead of getting permission to do things from the Department for Transport, we get our orders from Transport for London.I'm not sure if this counts considering all services travel mostly abroard, but Eurostar has no DOO based on my last experience.
The problem I feel with guards on companies like Southeastern is that they get out of the train to assess the platform of passengers, when clear he blows his whistle, beforehand locks the doors he's at open, then waits until all other doors are shut before getting back on and closing his. This costs time, which can easily be cut down if he just looked out the window of the rear cab of the train, or of the cab in another unit if there is one.![]()
![]()

The problem is that SouthEastern and certain other TOC's such as Crosscountry is that they operate on a semi-DOO basis where the driver opens the doors and the guard shuts them. Stupid system but there you go.![]()
The brand used publicly by ATOC companies.Define National Rail (and provide a source).
FGW's class 166 operated services from Paddington to Worcester had a guard from Oxford.
Javelin HS1 service.
Quite a few services actually have guards to/from Reading, which otherwise could be a DOO section from Oxford. It is mainly because the guard train crew depot is at Reading.
The problem I feel with guards on companies like Southeastern is that they get out of the train to assess the platform of passengers, when clear he blows his whistle, beforehand locks the doors he's at open, then waits until all other doors are shut before getting back on and closing his. This costs time, which can easily be cut down if he just looked out the window of the rear cab of the train, or of the cab in another unit if there is one.![]()
![]()
Even then, on Southeastern services that have a conductor, the services are treated as "DOO" when in the London area! So, trains starting from say London Charing Cross or London Cannon Street are dispatched using the CD/RA method, with the driver opening and closing the doors. This arrangement continues upto Sevenoaks, then beyond Hildenborough, the conductor closes the doors, then goes "BING BING" to the driver!The problem is that SouthEastern and certain other TOC's such as Crosscountry is that they operate on a semi-DOO basis where the driver opens the doors and the guard shuts them. Stupid system but there you go.![]()
I believe it is the case with thames turbos where the driver releases the door and then buzzes the driver to tell him/her to close them. Similar to voyagers.
I'm not sure if this counts considering all services travel mostly abroard, but Eurostar has no DOO based on my last experience.
The problem I feel with guards on companies like Southeastern is that they get out of the train to assess the platform of passengers, when clear he blows his whistle, beforehand locks the doors he's at open, then waits until all other doors are shut before getting back on and closing his. This costs time, which can easily be cut down if he just looked out the window of the rear cab of the train, or of the cab in another unit if there is one.![]()
![]()
To be pedantic (sorry!) Southeastern (SET) was mentioned in post #2. The 'Javelin' shuttle service is not a TOC but a name to a shuttle service that will be operated by SET during the Olympics... and the Javelin HS1 service.
They absolutely have the facility to do that, but are they worked like that? Maybe I am reading the original statement incorrectly, but I infer that "some" Banbury/Oxford - Paddington turbos will pick up a guard at Reading and some wont. To me that implies that the guard is on the train for reasons other than operational, because you wouldnt diagram some trains to run DOO and some to run conventionally manned if the traction, route and platform facilities are the same, surely?
No, there is still a Guard onboard with all the same duties and responsibilities as any other commercial Guard. The difference being that the person who presses "Doors Open" and "Doors Close" is the Driver. The latter executed under the instruction of the Guard.
So, not semi-DOO at all
No, what brad465/150222 said is right for the 375s, at least as far out as I am anyway. The 395s on the same routes do the "driver controlled dispatch referred to by yorkie. I can't speak for the Networkers as I've not travelled in them often enough.
From a purely passenger perspective, from what I can hear from the rearmost saloon on a 165/166 on the North Downs Line, the guard buzzes the driver (x3 I think), the doors close, then the guard buzzes again (x2?) and the train departs.
Guards work the services through to Reading simply because that is were they are based, there are no guards at Oxford so on some of the Cotswolds trains the guard would just have to pass up to Oxford anyway, instead they work the services from Reading. I'm not sure who controls the doors when a guard is on board from Reading to Oxford but they aren't just travelling passenger on the trains. When guards work 165s and 166s they do have to be despatched in the same way as voyagers, with the guard instructing the driver to close the doors.
This is interesting. If you are the second crew member on the train but don't do the doors, are you a guard or not?