• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Heathrow Express GWR Contract

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sprinter153

Member
Joined
12 Aug 2014
Messages
438
Location
In the TGS
A FirstGroup press release issued this morning states that Heathrow Express services are now confirmed to run until 2028. I've quoted this below. Further information comes from an internal brief issued today.

The service will take the form of a 10-year management contract (pending final agreement) and will be operated by Great Western Railway commencing in August 2018. Heathrow Airport will still be responsible for marketing, ticketing and branding but HEx staff will TUPE over to GWR.

All Class 332 units will be withdrawn by December 2019 and replaced with modified GWR Class 387 units. These will still be based at Reading TCD, meaning there is no need for a new HEx depot to replace the existing facility at Old Oak Common which is due to close.

GWR has 'sourced additional rolling stock' to enable the release of 387s for modification.

Heathrow Express service confirmed to 2028
28 Mar 2018

  • New agreement confirms Heathrow Express for at least a decade
  • Will improve rail service connections, resilience and reliability for Heathrow passengers
  • Rail services to Heathrow to rise from 18 trains per hour to at least 22 trains per hour from December 2019
  • Confirms Government support for developing western and southern rail links to Heathrow


Heathrow Express (‘HEx’) rail service has been preserved to at least 2028 under a new agreement announced today. This agreement, which confirms fast, non-stop rail connections for Heathrow passengers over the next decade, has been approved by the Department for Transport and will see Heathrow Airport retaining the commercial aspects including marketing, ticket pricing and revenue, while FirstGroup’s Great Western Railway (‘GWR’) subsidiary will run the operational aspects of the Heathrow Express service under a management contract from later this year.



As a result of this agreement, a new Heathrow Express Langley depot will no longer be needed. The depot would have been required to service trains because the HS2 building schedule requires HEx to vacate the Old Oak Common depot by the end of 2019.



Heathrow Airport will continue to own the HEx service, and will be responsible for managing rail stations at the airport. Passengers will also benefit from new ticket readers at Heathrow and Paddington, which will allow users of Heathrow Express and TfL Rail (soon to be Elizabeth line) to use pay as you go Oyster or a contactless device.



GWR will manage the introduction of a new, dedicated fleet of trains for the Heathrow Express service, which will be specially converted by December 2019 to provide first class carriages, high speed Wi-Fi, additional luggage racks and on-board entertainment. Until that time the HEx service will continue to be provided by the existing fleet of trains.



Building an integrated transport hub and ensuring at least 50% of Heathrow’s air passengers travel by public transport by 2030 is a priority for Heathrow.



This May, the initial phase of Heathrow Crossrail services will be introduced. From December 2019, and the full opening of the Elizabeth line, rail services to Heathrow will increase from 18 trains per hour today to at least 22 trains per hour. A train will depart Central London to Heathrow on average every two-and-a-half minutes, including:



  • 12 Piccadilly Line trains per hour – 6 trains serving Terminals 2, 3 and 4 and 6 trains serving Terminals 2, 3 and 5
  • 6 Elizabeth line trains per hour – 4 trains serving Terminals 2, 3 and 4 and 2 trains serving Terminals 2, 3 and 5
  • 4 Heathrow Express trains per hour – all trains serving Terminals 2, 3 and 5


Heathrow, the DfT, TfL and Network Rail are also conducting a joint feasibility study into increasing the frequency of the Elizabeth line service to 8 trains an hour by the mid-2020s.



As part of the arrangements, the Department for Transport will progress the development of the proposed new western and southern rail links to Heathrow. These new links would make it quicker and easier for people from the across the south and west of England, and south Wales, to get to the airport.





Rail Minister Jo Johnson said:

“We are investing in the biggest modernisation of the UK rail network since Victorian times and improving the provision and frequency of rail services to Heathrow is crucial to our plans.

“New western and southern rail links to Heathrow would make getting to the airport quicker and easier for holidaymakers and business travellers across the south west, south Wales and south of England, as well as helping connect UK exporters to new international markets.”



Heathrow Chief Executive John Holland-Kaye said:

“This agreement secures convenient and reliable public transport journeys to Heathrow in this decade and beyond. We have ambitious plans to transform rail journeys into the airport, and our passengers will reap the benefits of having Heathrow at the heart of an integrated, sustainable transport network.”



FirstGroup Chief Executive Tim O'Toole said:

“Today’s agreement demonstrates the transport industry working in partnership for the benefit of passengers, allowing fast and convenient connections to continue on this crucial airport link. We are an experienced rail operator with a strong track record in delivering customer improvements, and through this management contract we look forward to building on this operational expertise, as we work with Heathrow to bring in a dedicated fleet of high-specification trains that will help keep people moving and communities prospering in the future.”



Contacts at Heathrow:

Heathrow Press Office Tel: +44 (0)20 8745 7224



Contacts at FirstGroup:

FirstGroup Corporate Communications Tel: +44 (0) 20 7725 3354





Notes to editors:

The management contract will start in August 2018 and last until 2028. Should FirstGroup cease operating the GWR franchise before 2028, then it is expected that the arrangements will be transferred to any new franchise operator.



About Heathrow

Heathrow is the UK's hub airport, home to more than 80 airlines, connecting to more than 180 destinations. Every year, Heathrow welcomes over 70 million passengers with a commitment to 'making every journey better.' Following an investment of more than £11 billion over the last 10 years, passengers have now voted Heathrow the 'Best Airport in Western Europe' four years in a row, and 'Best Airport for Shopping' nine years in a row.



About Heathrow Express Operating Company

Heathrow Express is a non-franchised, non-subsidised private rail company which runs up to 150 services a day, and operates the stations at Heathrow Airport. Launched in 1998 the non-stop service carries an average of 17,000 passengers a day. It is the fastest rail link from London to Heathrow, with a journey time of just 15 minutes to Terminals 2 and 3 (a few minutes more for Terminals 4 and 5).



About GWR

GWR, the current Rail Operator of the Year, provides high speed, commuter, regional and branch line train services, carrying more than 105 million passengers every year across the Great Western rail franchise area, which includes South Wales, the West Country, the Cotswolds, and large parts of Southern England. FirstGroup will run the franchise until April 2020, bringing our experience of managing the route over many years to ensure the successful delivery of the major programme of infrastructure upgrades on the network. The DfT has also announced that it intends to negotiate a direct award for the GWR franchise for a duration of two years to April 2022, with an option for an extension of up to two further years at the DfT’s discretion. The £7.5bn Great Western Mainline modernisation programme is the biggest investment on the route since Brunel. During this time we are introducing new or refurbished trains on every part of the network meaning additional and more frequent services, reduced journey times and more seats, particularly on key commuter routes.



About FirstGroup

FirstGroup plc (LSE: FGP.L) is a leading transport operator in the UK and North America. With £5.7 billion in revenue and more than 100,000 employees, we transported around two billion passengers last year. Each of our five divisions is a leader in its field: in North America, First Student is the largest provider of student transportation with a fleet of more than 40,000 yellow school buses, First Transit is one of the largest providers of outsourced transit management and contracting services, while Greyhound is the only nationwide operator of scheduled intercity coaches. In the UK, First Bus is one of Britain's largest bus operators, transporting 1.6 million passengers a day, and we are one of the country's most experienced rail operators, carrying around 130 million passengers last year.

Moderator note: If anyone wishes to discuss future use of Class 332 stock, please use this thread: https://www.railforums.co.uk/thread...332s-could-they-join-333s-on-northern.162532/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

mallard

Established Member
Joined
12 Apr 2009
Messages
1,304
All Class 332 units will be withdrawn by December 2019

Any speculation as to their future? Re-fit with 333-style interiors and sent north? Awful lot of modern(ish) EMU stock going "spare" these days...
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
113,091
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
What an absolutely ridiculous idea in just about every way.

Ironing board fitted 387s = no premium service (like GatEx, which appears to carry mostly fresh air in its new form unless it's one of the through services from Brighton which isn't really GatEx).

Use of 387s in the first place = fewer for GWR = less effective GWML regional express service.

Premium fares retained for a non-premium service.

Ludicrous. If it needs to go away, just get rid of it.
 

Failed Unit

Established Member
Joined
26 Jan 2009
Messages
9,750
Location
Central Belt
You would hope that the up the quality of the 387s if they are going to use them, but I suspect once cross rail opens usage will nosedive and 4 coach trains will be good enough. I will no longer use it following cross rail when a single change at Moorgate or Farrington will make a much more pleasent journey.

I guess it is easier to make it half hourly now if needed it to increase CrossRail demand.

As for the 332s new home, I understand Scotrail need some high quality EMUs ;)
 

Domh245

Established Member
Joined
6 Apr 2013
Messages
8,426
Location
nowhere
Weren't the 387s ordered before there were some cutbacks to the extent of GW wiring, so there should be some slack in the fleet anyway (from not serving Oxford and so on). It also depends how modified the 387s are, they might be completely gutted and some other, more comfortable seat fitted. It does make me think however that Heathrow don't see much of a future for the service once Crossrail is up and running, and this is the first step in getting rid of it.
 

Mikey C

Established Member
Joined
11 Feb 2013
Messages
8,237
Shocked. The one thing the current service has is pretty funky looking trains both inside and out, they look premium. Interesting that 387s will now cover the Gatwick AND Heathrow services now...

What additional stock has GWR got to cover the modifications? Most of the decent stock (e.g. 379s) surely isn't available yet, or do they have spare 387s anyway
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
113,091
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
379s - now there's a thought - could those go to the GWR fleet to mean there isn't a loss of capacity from this?

I suppose the one upside is that it's flexible - if HEx proves to be unviable because everyone switches to Crossrail, you can just get rid of it and move the EMUs, staff and paths into GWR for something more useful e.g. a non-stop 12-car Reading EMU fast service which could allow the 800s to bar passengers travelling between Paddington and Reading at the times when this causes most trouble while offering those commuters a genuinely better service.
 

cactustwirly

Established Member
Joined
10 Apr 2013
Messages
8,407
Location
UK
Weren't the 387s ordered before there were some cutbacks to the extent of GW wiring, so there should be some slack in the fleet anyway (from not serving Oxford and so on). It also depends how modified the 387s are, they might be completely gutted and some other, more comfortable seat fitted. It does make me think however that Heathrow don't see much of a future for the service once Crossrail is up and running, and this is the first step in getting rid of it.

Atm the fleet is fully utilised, however crossrail frees up 4 units in May, and more will be freed up when it's extended to Reading in December 2019
 

TheDavibob

Member
Joined
10 Oct 2016
Messages
430
Do Class 387s run at 110mph on the GW mainline? If so, they'll eat up fewer fast paths than the HEx currently does, which is probably a good thing.
 

cactustwirly

Established Member
Joined
10 Apr 2013
Messages
8,407
Location
UK
Do Class 387s run at 110mph on the GW mainline? If so, they'll eat up fewer fast paths than the HEx currently does, which is probably a good thing.
Yes they do, but I'm not convinced that HEx eats up any fast paths, it's the other commuter services pathed before it that do.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
34,243
Weren't the 387s ordered before there were some cutbacks to the extent of GW wiring, so there should be some slack in the fleet anyway (from not serving Oxford and so on). It also depends how modified the 387s are, they might be completely gutted and some other, more comfortable seat fitted. It does make me think however that Heathrow don't see much of a future for the service once Crossrail is up and running, and this is the first step in getting rid of it.
The 387 numbers were significantly changed upwards, don’t forget originally GWR were having 365s as well. Then the number of 802s was significantly increased as well. I don’t think we know for sure that 387s won’t serve Oxford on stopping services - as extensions of the Didcots. Oxford is deferred until some time in CP6 at which time I expect some 387s to go there.

387s can also run at 110 as far as Heathrow Junction, which must help.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
34,243
Ironing board fitted 387s = no premium service (like GatEx, which appears to carry mostly fresh air in its new form unless it's one of the through services from Brighton which isn't really GatEx).
So you already know the exact details of the modifications described in the press release?
 

Domh245

Established Member
Joined
6 Apr 2013
Messages
8,426
Location
nowhere
The 387 numbers were significantly changed upwards, don’t forget originally GWR were having 365s as well. Then the number of 802s was significantly increased as well. I don’t think we know for sure that 387s won’t serve Oxford on stopping services - as extensions of the Didcots. Oxford is deferred until some time in CP6 at which time I expect some 387s to go there.

I know that the number of 387s went up, but I'd always been under the impression that was because they were opting for a common fleet and trying to accommodate a higher number of passengers than the 365s option would have allowed. But having looked up some dates, the final GWR order was announced at the start of June 2016, but the decision to "indefinitely defer" electrification to Oxford and Henley/Windsor was announced in early November, and whilst it is entirely probable that GWR were aware that this was coming, it is also entirely possible that they weren't aware and have now got a fleet that is too large* for it's future nominal daily use. I don't disagree about eventually seeing 387s in Oxford though, but odds are that by the time that happens HEx services will have come to an end and so GWR will have the fleet to do so (+6 units from c2c in all likelihood)

*not that there really is such a thing as too large for a london commuter railway until everything is running at maximum capacity (or equivalent)
 

Class465fan

Member
Joined
12 Jun 2016
Messages
263
Location
abbey wood
Yipee more unnecessary new modern trains with those nasty ironing board uncomfortable trash (with a lack of legroom) that's going to replace modern trains that don't even need replacing. God what is wrong DFT nowadays?
 

Domh245

Established Member
Joined
6 Apr 2013
Messages
8,426
Location
nowhere
God what is wrong DFT nowadays?

I'm not a massive fan of the DfT, but they've done literally nothing here. It's an agreement between two private companies that'll have been approved by the independent regulator, but to blame the DfT for this (and there is plenty to blame them for!) is stupid.
 

Failed Unit

Established Member
Joined
26 Jan 2009
Messages
9,750
Location
Central Belt
Yet another downgrade in quality

But do passengers really care? Lets look at some journeys.

Heathrow - City (Bank / Moorgate area) - Today. Get HEx to Paddington then Taxi / Tube? December 2019 - Direct
Heathrow - Thameslink destinations. Today. Get HEx to Paddington then Tube to Kings Cross St Pancras - December 2019 - 1 change at Farrington

HEx is popular today as it has no competition not because it is a nice comfortable train. You are on it for 15 minutes Max. If Cross-rail were ironing boards and HEx stays the same I wouldn't use it once Cross Rail comes into operation. It is going to be no longer relevant for the majority its former passengers.

What circumstances would use HEx in? I will be pleased to see the back of the overpriced service (I would use the Piccadilly line all the time but getting on at Kings Cross can be a challenge at certain times of the day). But once Cross rail opens I will NEVER use HEx again.
 

Joe Paxton

Established Member
Joined
12 Jan 2017
Messages
2,958
One very tangible benefit is that HEOC will no longer need a new depot, as the existing HEx depot at Old Oak Common is being swallowed up by the HS2 project.

I wonder, despite the "Heathrow Express service confirmed to 2028" headline, whether this doesn't provide some useful distance between Heathrow Airport Ltd (HAL) and the HEx service, which could be useful in future years if HAL deems that Crossrail has rendered the HEx service pointless.
 
Last edited:

coppercapped

Established Member
Joined
13 Sep 2015
Messages
3,317
Location
Reading
I suggest that there may be more to this than meets the eye.

One of the proposals for expansion of the railway network is the Western Rail Access to Heathrow for which the final scheduled public consultation is scheduled for late this spring.

This announcement seems to be one of the straws in the wind which suggests that this development will get the go-ahead as it means that there will be a fleet of trains which are more compatible with operation west of Heathrow than are the Class 332s with their 100mph maximum speed. So HEx will morph into a fast Reading - Heathrow - Paddington service and HS2 won't have to build a new depot at Langley for HEx.

Issues about seats are trivial - they can be easily replaced or modified to suit the new situation. On the other hand, if one is comparing them with the longitudinal seats in the Crossrail 345s, for the Maidenhead or Reading passenger the existing 387 seats may feel like nirvana...
 

Joe Paxton

Established Member
Joined
12 Jan 2017
Messages
2,958
I suggest that there may be more to this than meets the eye.

One of the proposals for expansion of the railway network is the Western Rail Access to Heathrow for which the final scheduled public consultation is scheduled for late this spring.

This announcement seems to be one of the straws in the wind which suggests that this development will get the go-ahead as it means that there will be a fleet of trains which are more compatible with operation west of Heathrow than are the Class 332s with their 100mph maximum speed. So HEx will morph into a fast Reading - Heathrow - Paddington service and HS2 won't have to build a new depot at Langley for HEx.
...

I was thinking something similar, I suspect this may be on the money.
 

Domh245

Established Member
Joined
6 Apr 2013
Messages
8,426
Location
nowhere
Quoting from someone who I understand to be a GWR insider:

"387130-41 will be converted for exclusive use on HeX services.

19 x 769 are being leased which will release Turbos from LTV services (North Downs, Henley and off peak Bourne End) for a reverse cascade to cover the 387 pre-December 2019, then post December 2019 the bulk of the LTV Turbos will go west to replace 15x & provide units for possible extra services (Bristol Metro). 769 units will cover most of what the LTV Turbos do today."

Everyone's favourite as yet unproven panacea makes another appearance, although it'll be nice to see their Dual Voltage credentials put to use as well as their bi-modal ones.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

ForTheLoveOf

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2017
Messages
6,416
I see this opening up all sorts of cans of worms to do with operator-specific tickets. If the service is operated by GWR then this presumably the same legal entity as the existing Heathrow Connect? In other words, the restriction 'Not Heathrow Exp' would no longer hold any meaning... I very much hope they change that so we don't get another 'Not Gatwick Express' situation...
 

BestWestern

Established Member
Joined
6 Feb 2011
Messages
6,736
I see this opening up all sorts of cans of worms to do with operator-specific tickets. If the service is operated by GWR then this presumably the same legal entity as the existing Heathrow Connect? In other words, the restriction 'Not Heathrow Exp' would no longer hold any meaning... I very much hope they change that so we don't get another 'Not Gatwick Express' situation...

It sounds very much like HEX are simply farming out the 'backoffice' bits, if you will, to GWR. The rolling stock, Drivers and oily bits will be taken care of by GWR, but it'll still be a Heathrow Express. Same branding, same product. The punters won't notice any difference (except losing those lovely 332s!).
 

Clip

Established Member
Joined
28 Jun 2010
Messages
10,821
I see its full on outrage mode of jumping in feet first before the finer details have been announced then?

What an absolutely ridiculous idea in just about every way.

Ironing board fitted 387s = no premium service (like GatEx, which appears to carry mostly fresh air in its new form unless it's one of the through services from Brighton which isn't really GatEx).

Use of 387s in the first place = fewer for GWR = less effective GWML regional express service.

Premium fares retained for a non-premium service.

Ludicrous. If it needs to go away, just get rid of it.

I see nothing that states the premium fares that are currently charged will still be charged in the future on this press release - unless ive missed it? With the whole Oyster and paper ticket thing not quite sorted they may just go with TfL pricing for it as they do elsewhere on GWR?

Yipee more unnecessary new modern trains with those nasty ironing board uncomfortable trash (with a lack of legroom) that's going to replace modern trains that don't even need replacing. God what is wrong DFT nowadays?

The press release says these units will be refurbed and luggage racks installed so how do you know that the legroom will be lacking?

You would hope that the up the quality of the 387s if they are going to use them, but I suspect once cross rail opens usage will nosedive and 4 coach trains will be good enough. I will no longer use it following cross rail when a single change at Moorgate or Farrington will make a much more pleasent journey.
But do passengers really care? Lets look at some journeys.

Heathrow - City (Bank / Moorgate area) - Today. Get HEx to Paddington then Taxi / Tube? December 2019 - Direct
Heathrow - Thameslink destinations. Today. Get HEx to Paddington then Tube to Kings Cross St Pancras - December 2019 - 1 change at Farrington

HEx is popular today as it has no competition not because it is a nice comfortable train. You are on it for 15 minutes Max. If Cross-rail were ironing boards and HEx stays the same I wouldn't use it once Cross Rail comes into operation. It is going to be no longer relevant for the majority its former passengers.

What circumstances would use HEx in? I will be pleased to see the back of the overpriced service (I would use the Piccadilly line all the time but getting on at Kings Cross can be a challenge at certain times of the day). But once Cross rail opens I will NEVER use HEx again.

i understand your frustrations here but im surprised that you can say for sure that changing at Farringdon on to Crossrail for this journey as i am assuming there will be plenty of people doing the same journey and on trains that will have a mix of longitudinal and traverse seating so you may end up standing for most if not all the way to Heathrow and thats not the same as the PIcc line? Im sure ive read on here in other threads that they reckon Crossail will be pretty much full(ish) a year or two after it opens.

By all means say you will boycott HEx but as you dont know how the journey will be on crossrail it seems daft to make such assumptions on comfort and quality of journey before you have even taken a trip on it.
 

rebmcr

Established Member
Joined
15 Nov 2011
Messages
4,005
Location
St Neots
Quoting from someone who I understand to be a GWR insider:

"387130-41 will be converted for exclusive use on HeX services.

19 x 769 are being leased which will release Turbos from LTV services (North Downs, Henley and off peak Bourne End) for a reverse cascade to cover the 387 pre-December 2019, then post December 2019 the bulk of the LTV Turbos will go west to replace 15x & provide units for possible extra services (Bristol Metro). 769 units will cover most of what the LTV Turbos do today."

Everyone's favourite as yet unproven panacea makes another appearance, although it'll be nice to see their Dual Voltage credentials put to use as well as their bi-modal ones.

There are plenty of 365s going spare to cover 387 turns, if the 769s fail to materialise...
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
34,243
I was thinking something similar, I suspect this may be on the money.
This bit is in the original linked article:

"As part of the arrangements, the Department for Transport will progress the development of the proposed new western and southern rail links to Heathrow. These new links would make it quicker and easier for people from the across the south and west of England, and south Wales, to get to the airport."

Note Western and Southern...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top