But Uno still drive buses around with the number on a bit of paper stuck to the windscreen, so you really need to be alert!
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
But Uno still drive buses around with the number on a bit of paper stuck to the windscreen, so you really need to be alert!
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
That's a good point. That means come autumn, they'll have to cut services to run no later than 4-5pm!Appropriately lit at night, I hopeOh, hang on, do they still operate at night?
A driver has confirmed on a local Hatfield group that the 797 was nearly always virtually empty on runs into London, hence why it will be slowly killed off. A new service had been restored from Hitchin to Hatfield and will likely remain safe.
This is a contrast to the Green Line 758 service from Hemel which from the 8th of May will be getting a Sunday service plus earlier and later runs from and to Hemel during the week.
http://www.intalink.org.uk/download/29047.2/
I agree there's not that much comparison, but Uno did itself no favours by having such a ridiculous bodge in the way it did things to get around certain rules. Splitting into two routes was silly, even if was using the same bus, as I'd argue a lot of people didn't realise - and with the reputation about buses running late/early, people would be concerned about a supposed change half way through.
Also, when it stopped going all the way to Victoria and instead dumped people at Baker Street, the writing was surely on the wall.
I think the other issue is that looking at the fares, it really wasn't that much cheaper to use the bus - and a whole lot more inconvenient, unless you wanted to go to somewhere along the way rather than all the way into London.
If Arriva couldn't make a go of it, it was pretty clear Uno wasn't going to do any better. I do wonder why they tried, and wonder if they got some funding from the local authority or considered it a publicity stunt.
Back in the 80s when United Counties ran express coaches from Beds / Northants they used to terminate at Marylebone station and not run through to Victoria. Go back even further and Birch Bros ran to Kings Cross.
Similarly, why do we suppose it is that Oxford sustains very frequent bus services to London but Cambridge doesn't? Given that Cambridge railway station is more than a mile from the city centre while the (far too small, admittedly) bus station is right in the city centre, it "ought" to be an obvious city for such a service. But it's Oxford that has it - even though Oxford is a rare example of a city where the bus station is awkwardly located.
The North Kent area also continues to have very good peak hour coach links to London, especially the City and Canary Wharf, a reflection perhaps on SouthEastern rail services and prices also an historical paucity of stations compared to lines in other Home Counties locations.
Commuter coaches are driven like 'hell for leather'. I wouldn't trust my life in the hands of one of their drivers.
The North Kent area also continues to have very good peak hour coach links to London, especially the City and Canary Wharf, a reflection perhaps on SouthEastern rail services and prices also an historical paucity of stations compared to lines in other Home Counties locations.
They do indeed, but these days it is only a commuter service. When I first moved to Rochester there was an all-day service to London, but that disappeared fifteen or so years ago.
For a while, Dartford, Gravesend, and the Medway Towns also had a night bus (originally NX1, later N81). That disappeared in about 2000, at much the same time as Loughton, Potters Bar, and Watford lost their night bus services. What Waltham Cross has done special that it's the only place outside Greater London still to be allowed a night bus, I don't know.
The big difference is geography and population - Hemel is circa 100,000 whereas Dunstable is circa 35,000 (according to Wikipedia) - and whilst Dunstable itself doesn't have a station, Leagrave is on its doorstep - in fact Leagrave station is closer to most of the population areas of Dunstable than Hemel station is to most of Hemel.The question should perhaps be why Hemel Hempstead can sustain an all-day fast bus service to London when few other towns at a similar distance can. The awkward location of Hemel Hempstead railway station is surely part of it, but if it were solely that then station-less Dunstable would be able to sustain such a service. It did used to have one (755, iirc), but not for 20+ years and now it has only a couple of commuter coaches M-F.
The only thing I can think of with Harlow is where its train services arrive in London i.e. in the city at Liverpool St. So Harlow is more attractive to people who want to work in the city than those in Hemel where the west-end is more attractive.I then thought of Harlow. Like Hemel, its railway station is awkwardly located; like Hemel, its train services aren't especially fast. But it doesn't have an all day bus service to London. What is different?
Similarly, why do we suppose it is that Oxford sustains very frequent bus services to London but Cambridge doesn't? Given that Cambridge railway station is more than a mile from the city centre while the (far too small, admittedly) bus station is right in the city centre, it "ought" to be an obvious city for such a service. But it's Oxford that has it - even though Oxford is a rare example of a city where the bus station is awkwardly located.
Notadriver said:Commuter coaches are driven like 'hell for leather'. I wouldn't trust my life in the hands of one of their drivers.
I've never been on one, but enough people in the North Kent area use them, almost all season ticket holders, I believe. I wouldn't have thought there was the road space to drive more than an average 25 or 30 mph!
Sorry? Do you make that sweeping statement for all of the (at least) five companies that provide such services? I have travelled to work and back this way for 6 years and have no qualms about the drivers. Most problems come with other people who expect a 12 ton vehicle to stop on a sixpence.
Birch Bros was before my time, but I remember Whippet Coaches 4 running from St Pancras to Huntingdon.
I used that service a few times from St Pancras to Welwyn Village. It was ridiculously cheap, but there were rarely more than half a dozen people on board.
The question should perhaps be why Hemel Hempstead can sustain an all-day fast bus service to London when few other towns at a similar distance can. The awkward location of Hemel Hempstead railway station is surely part of it, but if it were solely that then station-less Dunstable would be able to sustain such a service. It did used to have one (755, iirc), but not for 20+ years and now it has only a couple of commuter coaches M-F.
Luton has an even more frequent bus service to London than Hemel does, but that's largely to do with its airport. I doubt the town itself could sustain that service if the airport wasn't there.
I then thought of Harlow. Like Hemel, its railway station is awkwardly located; like Hemel, its train services aren't especially fast. But it doesn't have an all day bus service to London. What is different?
Similarly, why do we suppose it is that Oxford sustains very frequent bus services to London but Cambridge doesn't? Given that Cambridge railway station is more than a mile from the city centre while the (far too small, admittedly) bus station is right in the city centre, it "ought" to be an obvious city for such a service. But it's Oxford that has it - even though Oxford is a rare example of a city where the bus station is awkwardly located.
I think its telling that Cambridge is a Stagecoach city and doesn't have a single Megabus to London (or anywhere)There's a few factors at work.
Cambridge to London Victoria is at least 2 hours by coach, Oxford is 1h 40 - with stops in Central London on the way.
Oxford has only 2 fast trains an hour to London with a return at around £25. Cambridge also has 2 fast trains, but the slower trains to Liverpool Street have advance fares - it's not that hard to do a return for £12.
Oxford has a very good network of local bus services which are included in the price of a season on the coach from London and not much more for a return journey.
Cambridge bus station appears to be pretty much full, even though a lot of services do not use it, including all the NX coach services.
But we trust these drivers and if it was not safe I am sure they would not do it.
I think its telling that Cambridge is a Stagecoach city and doesn't have a single Megabus to London (or anywhere)
Sent from my ONE A2003 using Tapatalk
Yes I have been overtaken by these coaches while sticking to the speed limit in my own coach (I'm a fully qualified coach driver) as these change from one lane to the other in the attempt to gain as much ground as possible. Their drivers are often on shift for 15 hours a day. They aren't obviously driving all that time but multiply that by 5 days a week and tell me that's safe lol.
What Waltham Cross has done special that it's the only place outside Greater London still to be allowed a night bus, I don't know.
Operational convenience, I suspect. Waltham Cross Bus Station is less than half a mile from the Greater London boundary. Turning the service round (N279 iirc) anywhere else on the Hertford Road would be problematic.
The night tube will be reaching into Essex, and I believe some night buses from Loughton are planned to coincide, not that these latter will be controlled by TfL of course.
My sarcasm detector is wobbling at the moment!
What's the plan here? An ECC contract night bus from Loughton to Harlow via Epping?
I'd be willing to believe that there would be a market for that - although an operator would want a lot of money to run it, and you'd imagine that the fares would have to be fairly high. But if ECC were keen to provide a service along those lines, wouldn't they already be doing it, running from Waltham Cross?