Riverside Redz
Member
I’m not against it because I love the LNER brand but wouldn’t “GBR- London Northeastern” suffice. Seems daft having railway in the name twiceGreat British Railways - London North Eastern Railway is a bit of a mouthful!
I’m not against it because I love the LNER brand but wouldn’t “GBR- London Northeastern” suffice. Seems daft having railway in the name twiceGreat British Railways - London North Eastern Railway is a bit of a mouthful!
Doesn’t even need the GBR prefix, the double arrow is designed to serve that purpose surely so the rail symbol followed by Intercity East Coast, Intercity LNER, Intercity London & North Eastern or even just LNER would be sufficient.Or even GBR East Coast. But that would probably be too sensible, despite being two syllables shorter.
I'm sure that is only until GBR is actually formed and or LNER is folded into its specific region. See also GBR - Avanti until it is taken back (that's if they actually manage the rebrand shown in the images upthread before hand...)My comment was on the basis that it's been reported that the LNER name is staying.
I meant that as we have Great British Railways / Southern, Great British Railways / Chiltern etc it'll be Great British Railways / LNER on the side of trains. That's what's been reported anyway (I've read it but no, I can't remember where). I doubt we'll have too long to wait to see if that's the case.I'm sure that is only until GBR is actually formed and or LNER is folded into its specific region. See also GBR - Avanti until it is taken back (that's if they actually manage the rebrand shown in the images upthread before hand...)
That's exciting news, and thanks for the update.Looks like 387172 is out and about again. Did an out and back to Eastbourne from Selhurst today (ECS, so I presume a test run).
Indeed but that's technically the full name!Surely it will be LNER as that is what the company is known as.