• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Gizmogle's Cool Wall

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

D306

Established Member
Joined
9 Apr 2007
Messages
2,237
Location
somewhere concrete
I've only been on a 455 once, and the ride was terrible (Was southern by the way) and it smelt funny
 

1D53

Established Member
Joined
2 Apr 2006
Messages
2,888
Oi, don't diss the Dusty Bins (321's)!
 

laseandre

Established Member
Joined
27 Oct 2007
Messages
1,264
I have the right to. I've been on their older brothers (320s) and they're all bad.
 

laseandre

Established Member
Joined
27 Oct 2007
Messages
1,264
They're just about the same as a 320, except in FSR colours, I think.
 

me123

Established Member
Joined
9 Jul 2007
Messages
8,510
322s might be better becasue they're longer and have toilets, so I would imagine a potentially better journey on them. The 320s suck. No shoulder room, each normal person take up 1.5 seats, they're not comfortable, have these little stubs sticking out of the wall that scotrail claim are tables, have sever usage restrictions... should I go on?

At least 318s and 334s have shouder room, either have sensible tables or none at all, 334s have armrests. Both are much more comfortable for the potentially hour long + journey that 320s do.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Before you start ranting about rubbish left by the passengers its hardly the train's fault...

That is a huge issue as well. The pasengers are terrible on the route. They won't sit next to people, they won't let people sit next to them, a lot of them stink, and they all leave rubbish. Another issue altogether, but the whole North Clyde Electric experience generally sucks since the good old 303s left. :(
 

class 313

Established Member
Joined
10 Dec 2005
Messages
6,475
Location
St Albans
322s might be better becasue they're longer and have toilets, so I would imagine a potentially better journey on them.

Why would you have a better journey without a toilet? Have you ever needed the toilet really bad to find out you're on a 455 and the closet thing to a toilet is 10mins to the next station!? Its criminal to have trains without toilets, it really is.
 

Craig

Established Member
Joined
15 Jun 2005
Messages
3,958
Location
Newcastle
Are you feeling ok Loader?

He said they have toilets as well as having toilets and thus a better journey. Where did your little rant come from? Tho you are right if a little random.
 

Coxster

Established Member
Joined
9 Jun 2005
Messages
9,243
What is the longest Class 455 working - can't be much more than an hour tops? If you can't go that long without the assistance of a lavatory then perhaps you might want to see your doctor? They're designed as commuter trains to fit as many as possible in - not long distance leisure trips.
 

class 313

Established Member
Joined
10 Dec 2005
Messages
6,475
Location
St Albans
Are you feeling ok Loader?

He said they have toilets as well as having toilets and thus a better journey. Where did your little rant come from? Tho you are right if a little random.

Oh :oops: oh dear :shock:

I totally miss read that.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
What is the longest Class 455 working - can't be much more than an hour tops? If you can't go that long without the assistance of a lavatory then perhaps you might want to see your doctor? They're designed as commuter trains to fit as many as possible in - not long distance leisure trips.

Though what if you board the 455 needing the loo but couldn't go before hand for some reason or another...?
 

me123

Established Member
Joined
9 Jul 2007
Messages
8,510
My theory is that, if they have better amenities, they might as a result have better comfort, internal environment and all that. Probably rubbish, but that's my theory :)
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
What is the longest Class 455 working - can't be much more than an hour tops? If you can't go that long without the assistance of a lavatory then perhaps you might want to see your doctor? They're designed as commuter trains to fit as many as possible in - not long distance leisure trips.

To be fair, Coxster, not everyone getting on the train will have an empty bladder. Some people may board said service with a rather full bladder, hoping to make use of the facility and *dramatic organ music* it's not there <D A rather wet journey for the surrounding passenegrs results.

334s and 318s have toilet facilites, and the longest journey they make is about an hour, maybe a bit more on commuter lines because of the slow speeds and additional stops. Of course, they are locked on these services anyway.
 

Tom B

Established Member
Joined
27 Jul 2005
Messages
4,681
All about purpose, if trains are only for short distance hops then why fit them with toilets when seats can be provided? Toilets can be put on at stations.

Of course, a train doing London - Inverness would be slightly uncomfortable without them.

However, do remember to lock them. A bloke found out to his cost that, yes, you do have to press the "LOCK" button on the fancy ones on GNER trains. The rest of the coach found it thoroughly amusing.
 

class 313

Established Member
Joined
10 Dec 2005
Messages
6,475
Location
St Albans
All about purpose, if trains are only for short distance hops then why fit them with toilets when seats can be provided?

Will 4 or so seats really be missed?

I'm sure people would rather stand and know they can stand in comfort without being in agony.
 

Tom B

Established Member
Joined
27 Jul 2005
Messages
4,681
Get off at the next station and use the facilities there :).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top