GRALISTAIR
Established Member
1985 when Aberdeen won the SPL?
-
Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!
General Knowledge Quiz
- Thread starter transportphoto
- Start date
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R
RailUK Forums
OhNoAPacer
Member
Sorry not the right answer, Celtic won the Scottish Cup and Rangers the League Cup that season.
Caboose Class
Member
1954-1955
Aberdeen won the League Title, Clyde won the Scottish Cup and Hearts won the League Cup.
OhNoAPacer
Member
Caboose Class
Member
Am shortly off out for the day - Open Floor.
341o2
Established Member
- Joined
- 17 Oct 2011
- Messages
- 2,013
What was (and is) a Pou du Ciel, or in English a Flying Flea
OhNoAPacer
Member
Is that the homemade aircraft?
341o2
Established Member
- Joined
- 17 Oct 2011
- Messages
- 2,013
It was indeed homemade, the invention of one Henri Mignet (not to say that there have been other homemade aircraft). Mignet promoted aviation for the people, one theory of the origin of the name referred to the Model T Ford Pou de la Route. "If you can nail up a packing case, you can build an airplane", he proclaimed.
It is estimated that over 1,000 Fleas were built in the UK, France, and the USA. Mignet had no training in aviation and claimed the designers and manufacturers of aircraft were simply out to make money. His first designs never got off the ground
Mignet crossed the channel in his Flea, after having crashed en route, wrecking the engine, and Pou fever took off. There was a meeting for Flea owners, where most never got airborne. They should be thankful. because the Flea had one fatal flaw - the design of the tandem wings was such, that when descending, one had to be careful as the stick force reversed, the tail would lift and the aircraft was liable to go into a nosedive. Usually, this meant crashing into the ground, but if at a sufficient altitude it would end up flying upside down, whereupon it was so stable that it was virtually impossible to right it.
Pou fever ended after several fatalities.
Your floor
It is estimated that over 1,000 Fleas were built in the UK, France, and the USA. Mignet had no training in aviation and claimed the designers and manufacturers of aircraft were simply out to make money. His first designs never got off the ground
Mignet crossed the channel in his Flea, after having crashed en route, wrecking the engine, and Pou fever took off. There was a meeting for Flea owners, where most never got airborne. They should be thankful. because the Flea had one fatal flaw - the design of the tandem wings was such, that when descending, one had to be careful as the stick force reversed, the tail would lift and the aircraft was liable to go into a nosedive. Usually, this meant crashing into the ground, but if at a sufficient altitude it would end up flying upside down, whereupon it was so stable that it was virtually impossible to right it.
Pou fever ended after several fatalities.
Your floor
OhNoAPacer
Member
What, other than obviously involving royalty, connects the marriage of Prince Arthur to Catherine of Aragon and the marriage if Charles I to Henrietta Maria?
xotGD
Established Member
- Joined
- 4 Feb 2017
- Messages
- 7,826
First cousins marrying each other?
OhNoAPacer
Member
Not the correct answer I am afraid
GRALISTAIR
Established Member
Neither marriage was the 1st choice? Arthur died so then Henry VIII and her got married. This was to supposedly prevent war and cement anglo-spanish relations. Then Charles 1st wasnt supposed to inherit throne his older brother was, but he died and there was some shenanigans with the Spanish so Charles ended up marrying the French bird Henrietta Maria.
Last edited:
OhNoAPacer
Member
Arthur did marry Catherine.
I can see the good logic in your answer, it was not uncommon for royal betrothal to fall apart due to various political reasons.
But that is not the answer in this case.
Gloster
Veteran Member
Was it who officiated that matters, possibly it wasn’t the Archbishop of Canterbury?
OhNoAPacer
Member
It is not who officiated that is at issue.
DaleCooper
Established Member
They held their receptions in the same pub?
GRALISTAIR
Established Member
You really are creasing me up with laughter at some of your answers.
OhNoAPacer
Member
Unfortunately not, Arthur was under 18 so had to hold his reception in the church hall.
OhNoAPacer
Member
I imagine so, but until the reformation all brides of English royalty would have been.
The connection is something more specific.
xotGD
Established Member
- Joined
- 4 Feb 2017
- Messages
- 7,826
They had all been married previously and widowed.
OhNoAPacer
Member
Incorrect I am afraid.
As an additional piece if information you the same connection applies to the marriage of Margaret Tudor and James IV if Scotland.
Other marriages can also be added to the list.
Gloster
Veteran Member
Did the marriage take place at the bridegroom’s place of worship, rather than the bride’s?
The were both married by proxy?
EbbwJunction1
Established Member
Was it that neither spouse took the title of Queen?
OhNoAPacer
Member
They did become queen, albeit for Catherine after she married Arthur's brother Henry.
Is the correct answer.
Your turn at the altar
GRALISTAIR
Established Member
The French lady Michelle Mouton perhaps?
It wasn’t Sabine, she would've only been a kid in 1983.
Correct answer, the floor is yours.