Trainman40083
Established Member
When I passed by a couple of weeks ago, only 99001/99002 were outside.Anyone know if either or both 99003 99004 are outside at Leicester or tucked up in the warmth of their new home??
When I passed by a couple of weeks ago, only 99001/99002 were outside.Anyone know if either or both 99003 99004 are outside at Leicester or tucked up in the warmth of their new home??
Thank you...When I passed by a couple of weeks ago, only 99001/99002 were outside.
Assuming that this is still accurate, I've had a look at this website linked below.Wnxx website reporting that 99005 and 99006 due to dock at Portbury on February 5th.
There is another ship expected to arrive on Wednesday that is a General Cargo Ship and originates from SpainAssuming that this is still accurate, I've had a look at this website linked below.
The link shows a list of vessels that are expected to arrive at Portbury in the coming days.
Port of Portbury (United Kingdom (UK)) - Arrivals, Departures, Expected vessels - VesselFinder
Port of Portbury (United Kingdom (UK)) - Real-time data for recent ship arrivals and departures, ships in port and scheduled vessel arrivals. Weather information and forecasts for the next 7 days.www.vesselfinder.com
99001+99002 arrived on Constance, which according to the website above is a General Cargo Ship.
99003+99004 arrived on Nereus Highway, which according to the website above is a Vehicles Carrier.
The only vehicles carrier scheduled to arrive at Portbury in the next 3 days (according to the above link) is the Grande Roma tomorrow at 10:00. So could that be the ship for 99005+99006?
Also while I'm typing here, a quick question. Did anyone see either 0Q75 or 0Q76 on Saturday and if so, can anyone please confirm that 99002 led 0Q75 Millerhill - Peterborough and 99001 led 0Q76 Peterborough - Leicester?
If it helps, the pair visible outside at Leicester yesterday ( 11/02/26 ) were 99 001 + 99 003, so very possibly those two?The next outing of a 99 is tomorrow afternoon in daylight to Peterborough. I don't think all the paths are in the system yet, so I've only posted the Peterborough related ones here for now, but whichever 99 (or 99's) go to Peterborough will be testing on the GEML between Ipswich and Temple Mills loop tomorrow night/Saturday morning.
99 Facebook page reporting that 005/6 are on the Canadian Highway, now due to dock on Feb 17th at 11.00.Anyone know whether they have arrived yet or still on course for 12th?
Yes.Looks like they will then do 3 runs between Ipswich and Felixstowe on Sunday. Then back to Peterborough in the evening.
The ship looks to be sat in the lee of southern Portugal/Spain waiting for the weather to drop. There’s currently 6m+ waves in the Atlantic.99 Facebook page reporting that 005/6 are on the Canadian Highway, now due to dock on Feb 17th at 11.00.
Would those be with a trailing load to test performance on the hill?Looks like they will then do 3 runs between Ipswich and Felixstowe on Sunday. Then back to Peterborough in the evening.
Full train, as close to 2200 tonnes as possible.Would those be with a trailing load to test performance on the hill?
Only timed for 1600 tonnes for the Felixstowe runs. 1200 for the Stratford and 2400 to/from Peterborough. So they must all be less than 1200 unless they take off and then add back on some wagons at Ipswich.Full train, as close to 2200 tonnes as possible.
According to RTT, the first run to Felixstowe, 4Q26, is timed for 2400 tonnes.Only timed for 1600 tonnes for the Felixstowe runs. 1200 for the Stratford and 2400 to/from Peterborough. So they must all be less than 1200 unless they take off and then add back on some wagons at Ipswich.
Note 4Q24, 4Q26 and 4Q27 involve two visits to Temple Mills in London via the GEML !.Yes.
4Q26 0900 Ex Ipswich
4Q28 1028 Ex FXN
4Z28 1137 Ex Ipswich
4Q29 1331 Ex FXN
4Z29 1437 Ex Ipswich
4Q30 1625 Ex FXN
4Q05 1801 Ex Ipswich (To Peterborough)
wnxx website now stating the 20th for docking and 23rd Feb for onward movement.99 Facebook page reporting that 005/6 are on the Canadian Highway, now due to dock on Feb 17th at 11.00.
Class 99s...
The arrival of 99005 & 99006 (both MBEL) into the UK has been delayed slightly again, shipping arrangements, and they are now currently expected to arrive on/around the 20th. Movement from Avonmouth is currently scheduled to take place on the 23rd.
Anyone know what the total weight of 4Q04 was?
By the looks of this video, 4Q26 was indeed headed by the sheds and 4Q28 headed by 99001 (though it's hard to tell if this was on its own under power as, in the departure seen at 2:10 in the video, I feel like I can hear 99002's engine idling):Looking at the Sunday runs listed in post #1271 above:
4Q26 this morning (09:00 Ipswich Yard - Felixstowe North) was consisted with 66721 / 66301 / 99002 / 99001 and the full train of 36 wagons used on 4Q24 Friday night (see post #1279).
If the 66s were leading as per consist (?) this may have just been a positioning move.
4Q28 10:26 Felixstowe North - Ipswich Yard is consisted as 99001 / 99002 / 66721 / 66301 and 24 of the intermodal wagons ex 4Q26. Assuming 99001 is working solo, this gives a trailing weight of 1651 tons (3 dead locos + 24 wagons). It departed late and lost a further 30 mins on the way to Ipswich, but this appears to be due to regulation for passenger trains on the branch rather than any performance issues.
Final clip in the video is of 4Q30 with 99001 working very hard. I think it's the only one under power but again can't quite tell for sure. That 36 wagon consist is absolutely huge! Presumably 4Q28 was intended as a software test with 4Q30 being the stretch goal for testing.4Q30 16:27 Felixstowe North - Ipswich Yard is interesting as the consist shows 99001 / 99002 / 66301 / 66721 with the full formation of 36 wagons marshalled back together that had arrived on 4Q26 this morning. It's not clear on TOPS if 99001 was working solo (should be some YouTube videos to check later) but if so it would be 2357 tons trailing again. If 99001 + 99002 were working in multi it would be 2244 tons trailing.
Trouble building air I was told caused the late start.Looking at the Sunday runs listed in post #1271 above:
4Q26 this morning (09:00 Ipswich Yard - Felixstowe North) was consisted with 66721 / 66301 / 99002 / 99001 and the full train of 36 wagons used on 4Q24 Friday night (see post #1279).
If the 66s were leading as per consist (?) this may have just been a positioning move.
4Q28 10:26 Felixstowe North - Ipswich Yard is consisted as 99001 / 99002 / 66721 / 66301 and 24 of the intermodal wagons ex 4Q26. Assuming 99001 is working solo, this gives a trailing weight of 1651 tons (3 dead locos + 24 wagons). It departed late and lost a further 30 mins on the way to Ipswich, but this appears to be due to regulation for passenger trains on the branch rather than any performance issues.
Thanks for that, I must have skimmed it and not clocked that. Certainly a hefty load then, the results are going to be very interesting!Same as 4Q24 (post #1279) - assuming 99001 was working solo, it would have been a trailing tonnage of 2357 (pulling 3 locos + 36 wagons).
But does any one know the actual container weights? Most container services are lighter than the wagon max weights would permit, hence surely those numbers are the maximum they could be and in reality the train would be lighter than the maximum?Same as 4Q24 (post #1279) - assuming 99001 was working solo, it would have been a trailing tonnage of 2357 (pulling 3 locos + 36 wagons).
If 99001 + 99002 were working in multi it would be 2244 tons trailing.