• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

GBRf Class 99 - 30 locomotives now ordered

Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Mollman

Established Member
Joined
21 Sep 2016
Messages
1,715
Location
Preston
GBRf news of work for 99s:
As part of Belmond’s commitment to reduce its carbon footprint, it has been agreed that both the Britannic Explorer and Royal Scotsman services will switch from the Class 66s to the new bi-mode Class 99s in 2027. The new cutting-edge locomotives, running on both electricity and renewable fuels, will meet today’s demands and tomorrow’s standards
 

99009

Member
Joined
4 Apr 2025
Messages
314
Location
Chesterfield
As promised, here are the next moves for either one or both of 99001+99002. They're heading to Leicester via Peterborough yard on Monday morning.

0Q92 Whitemoor - Peterborough:

0Q93 Peterborough - Leicester:

Note that, for some reason, 0Q93 to Leicester is shown as running MFO (Monday and/or Friday only).
 

train_lover

Member
Joined
2 Nov 2007
Messages
444
The Belmond service does not need an ETH-fitted 99/4 fleet. It runs currently using 75mph, no-heat Class 66s.
Just because the train runs with a mk3 generator coach now doesnt mean it will stay in the rake forever. If you replace the generator coach with a normal coach then that's more tickets you can sell per train.
 

Class15

Established Member
Joined
30 Dec 2021
Messages
4,141
Location
North London or Mildmay line
Just because the train runs with a mk3 generator coach now doesnt mean it will stay in the rake forever. If you replace the generator coach with a normal coach then that's more tickets you can sell per train.
Indeed, currently the 66 is used as the generator car is available but in the future running a 99/4 gives more flexibility. What if the generator car has a fault or something?
 

D6130

Established Member
Joined
12 Jan 2021
Messages
9,073
Location
West Yorkshire/Tuscany
Just because the train runs with a mk3 generator coach now doesnt mean it will stay in the rake forever. If you replace the generator coach with a normal coach then that's more tickets you can sell per train.
Indeed, currently the 66 is used as the generator car is available but in the future running a 99/4 gives more flexibility. What if the generator car has a fault or something?
Is the generator car not also the brake vehicle?....in which case it will still be required; unless of course all the ex-IÉ Mark 3s are fitted with handbrakes, as is the norm in the continent.
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
18,819
Just because the train runs with a mk3 generator coach now doesnt mean it will stay in the rake forever. If you replace the generator coach with a normal coach then that's more tickets you can sell per train.

Indeed, currently the 66 is used as the generator car is available but in the future running a 99/4 gives more flexibility. What if the generator car has a fault or something?
The Britannic Explorer uses the Irish standard train supply system, hence why an Irish generator van is used. Are GBRf really going to fit a completely different train supply system to their locos for one train, which would be utterly useless on any other potential operation? I think not.
 
Joined
22 Jan 2024
Messages
588
Location
Yorkshire
Just because the train runs with a mk3 generator coach now doesnt mean it will stay in the rake forever. If you replace the generator coach with a normal coach then that's more tickets you can sell per train.

These are Irish Mk3s. I believe that Ireland uses a 3-phase system and assuming that hasn't been changed on that set then an ETS-capable loco with the standard UK system would be entirely useless so far as providing power to the stock. I also assume that there are two gensets in the generator vehicle, so there is redundancy should one fail - which isn't the case with a single loco.

The Scotsman likewise has its own gensets, and from the type of jumpers it has I assume that this set has also been re-wired for 3-phase.
 

ac6000cw

Established Member
Joined
10 May 2014
Messages
3,911
Location
Cambridge, UK
I believe that Ireland uses a 3-phase system
AFAIK that's correct. The IÉ 201 class locos were originally equipped to supply 3-phase ETS to the Mk 3 and Enterprise stock. Essentially a North American 'Head End Power' setup but running at European spec 230/400V 50Hz.
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
18,819
AFAIK that's correct. The IÉ 201 class locos were originally equipped to supply 3-phase ETS to the Mk 3 and Enterprise stock. Essentially a North American 'Head End Power' setup but running at European spec 230/400V 50Hz.
So the closest thing to supplying the stock in Britain would be an HST power car (415V three phase)?
 

cce

Member
Joined
10 May 2018
Messages
78
As a multi day excursion, having generators allows the loco to leave the stock and go for fuelling etc overnight while passengers sleep
 

JKF

Established Member
Joined
29 May 2019
Messages
1,299
Maybe Belmond will just keep the generator car.
If it stops in the same place every week for an overnight stay, would it be worth them installing a shore supply? Suppose that’s getting a bit off topic!
 

Rail Quest

Member
Joined
8 Apr 2023
Messages
757
Location
Warrington
As promised, here are the next moves for either one or both of 99001+99002. They're heading to Leicester via Peterborough yard on Monday morning.

0Q92 Whitemoor - Peterborough:

0Q93 Peterborough - Leicester:

Note that, for some reason, 0Q93 to Leicester is shown as running MFO (Monday and/or Friday only).
After the locomotives arrive into Leicester tomorrow (assuming they reach there), there's a 5Q** ECS move to Euston and back. The train service code is different to the light loco movements mentioned above, so these could be unrelated. If they run and are 99-related, I'm wondering if this is more ride quality testing or if these are something more.

 

Class15

Established Member
Joined
30 Dec 2021
Messages
4,141
Location
North London or Mildmay line
After the locomotives arrive into Leicester tomorrow (assuming they reach there), there's a 5Q** ECS move to Euston and back. The train service code is different to the light loco movements mentioned above, so these could be unrelated. If they run and are 99-related, I'm wondering if this is more ride quality testing or if these are something more.

I reckon this is more likely to be the GBRf class 769/5s, but anything is possible!
 
Joined
22 Jan 2024
Messages
588
Location
Yorkshire
If it stops in the same place every week for an overnight stay, would it be worth them installing a shore supply? Suppose that’s getting a bit off topic!

What, at all the locations where it might stable overnight? There are going to be a few of those!

Given that Belmond have been running the Scotsman with onboard generators for years, it would appear that they are happy with the arrangement!
 

Rail Quest

Member
Joined
8 Apr 2023
Messages
757
Location
Warrington
Looks like the locomotives returned to Leicester today. I can see an outbound move for them to go back to Peterborough (L.I.P. this time) on Wednesday:

And then a return to Leicester on Friday:
 

ac6000cw

Established Member
Joined
10 May 2014
Messages
3,911
Location
Cambridge, UK
So the closest thing to supplying the stock in Britain would be an HST power car (415V three phase)?
Yes, probably - whether the ETS connectors would be compatible is another matter though, I suspect.

The Euro 230/400V standard domestic/commercial supply voltage is a deliberate compromise between the typical original 220/380V European mainland standard and our original 240/415V standard anyway (all voltages are nominal e.g. the current standard allows a ± 10% tolerance on 230V which covers all the legacy voltages).
 

800001

Established Member
Joined
24 Oct 2015
Messages
7,369
Looks like the locomotives returned to Leicester today. I can see an outbound move for them to go back to Peterborough (L.I.P. this time) on Wednesday:

And then a return to Leicester on Friday:
Possibly in connection with launch event at Peterborough?

Wnxx website says they are getting spruced up at Leicester, comment from wnxx below
99001 & 99002 are to be spruced up for their official launch event (in Peterborough), then further testing is set to be undertaken on the ECML.
The livery carried by 99001 & 99002 is unique to these two. 99003 (currently due to arrive into the UK during November 2025) onwards will be slightly different.
 

Suraggu

Member
Joined
23 Oct 2013
Messages
1,083
Location
The Far North
Something that won't be mentioned in the press releases about the eco credentials of moving to class 99 haulage.
And also the additional cost to the customer for switching to a class 99. That leasing cost difference from a class 66 hauled service has to be paid somehow.
 

Class15

Established Member
Joined
30 Dec 2021
Messages
4,141
Location
North London or Mildmay line
And also the additional cost to the customer for switching to a class 99. That leasing cost difference from a class 66 hauled service has to be paid somehow.
One presumes that Ford will be willing to pay this for their GBRf services, considering that they have traditionally been one of the best users of electric traction in the post-privatisation era. Is the car terminal at Dagenham still electrified? (It was in 2018 but I wouldn’t be surprised if they took the wires down since)
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
18,535
Location
Northampton
One presumes that Ford will be willing to pay this for their GBRf services, considering that they have traditionally been one of the best users of electric traction in the post-privatisation era.
They'll only pay if the price is right. Ford won't be using electric traction for sentimental reasons.
Is the car terminal at Dagenham still electrified? (It was in 2018 but I wouldn’t be surprised if they took the wires down since)
Looking on google aerial and SV imagery the connection to Ripple Lane Exchange Sidings appears to be electrified (or at least have OLE Structures) to Kent Ave bridge or shortly after it, but there's no suggestion that the 'yard' area itself, nor any connections into the factory itself, were ever wired. Which section was wired in 2018? (Always possible for things to have been redeveloped in the meantime, some of the sidings looks to have reasonably fresh ballast). ORM shows no electrification beyond the crossovers connecting to the Up Ripple Lane Chord from HS1.

Although if I had a Class 99, using the diesel option to shunt around the yard and putting the pan up/down in Ripple Lane Exchange sidings would be the obvious option.
 

Class15

Established Member
Joined
30 Dec 2021
Messages
4,141
Location
North London or Mildmay line
They'll only pay if the price is right. Ford won't be using electric traction for sentimental reasons.
I rather meant that they seemed to be a good user and there’s no reason why that wouldn’t still be the case.
Looking on google aerial and SV imagery the connection to Ripple Lane Exchange Sidings appears to be electrified (or at least have OLE Structures) to Kent Ave bridge or shortly after it, but there's no suggestion that the 'yard' area itself, nor any connections into the factory itself, were ever wired. Which section was wired in 2018? (Always possible for things to have been redeveloped in the meantime, some of the sidings looks to have reasonably fresh ballast). ORM shows no electrification beyond the crossovers connecting to the Up Ripple Lane Chord from HS1.

Although if I had a Class 99, using the diesel option to shunt around the yard and putting the pan up/down in Ripple Lane Exchange sidings would be the obvious option.
Interesting, the Class 90s worked the 6L35/6X77 circuit regularly during that period into Dagenham. Maybe only the reception sidings were wired?
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
18,535
Location
Northampton
I rather meant that they seemed to be a good user and there’s no reason why that wouldn’t still be the case.
Other than the relative prices of electricity and diesel... I agree though for Ford's long distance routes a Class 99 would be very attractive.
Interesting, the Class 90s worked the 6L35/6X77 circuit regularly during that period into Dagenham. Maybe only the reception sidings were wired?
Kent Avenue Bridge is basically where the sidings start to fan out, and the Sectional Appendix does not say anything about the connecting line being non-electrified. It's very possible that the electrics worked up to the limit of OLE and then shunted off, letting the 08 take it the last hundred yards of so. On the 2009 Street View photo from Kent Avenue there's definitely no OLE into the sidings themselves.
The weird loop looks big enough for a pair of locos, which would fit with my suggestion of detach and shunt. 08 waits on the loop, 90(s) stop before points, detach and draw forwards, then 08 attaches and hauls the wagons in. in reverse, 90(s) would be standing waiting at the loop, 08 would haul out then detach and draw forward to loop, 90(s) drop on then depart towards Ripple Lane.
1752567850065.png

But there is apparently OLE in October 24 as far as this odd cripple sidings/loco cupboard (the big grey bridge in this image is the footbridge adjacent to Kent Avenue): Which suggests 90s worked beyond Ripple Lane but not all the way into the sidings

1752567934999.png
 

BRX

Established Member
Joined
20 Oct 2008
Messages
4,515
And also the additional cost to the customer for switching to a class 99. That leasing cost difference from a class 66 hauled service has to be paid somehow.

I don't see why the customer would pay any more unless there was any advantage to them. Surely they just want stuff moved from A to B. They don't care what's hauling it.

Presumably GBRf have worked out that using these machines will let them operate various services more efficiently, saving themselves some running costs in exchange for the capital cost of the locos themselves.
 

Top