• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Future of Class 379

Status
Not open for further replies.

Peter Sarf

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
9,659
Location
Croydon
Yes, how dare those naughty passengers try to use the passenger railway. They must be priced off!

If trains can be overcrowded and still not come close to "paying their way" at current British fare levels, there is something fundamentally wrong with the system which will not be fixed by just increasing the fares a bit.

Maybe Southern are selling too many extremely cheap advances on trains which are already busy, but I imagine if they had been, DfT would have told them to knock it off already.
That is the elephant in the room. A lot of the railways never were paying their way. If they did then the government would have to mind their own business. I am not saying subsidy is wrong but it has its downsides and may not be so forthcoming now.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

RailWonderer

Established Member
Joined
25 Jul 2018
Messages
2,217
Location
All around the network
Now with Sunak as PM it looks like austerity round two is the policy of the day so I can't see the DfT paying for leasing these. Scrap is a realistic option at this point unless rising leasing costs (as they are increasing now) see the 379s as cheaper than ordering new.
 

Peter Sarf

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
9,659
Location
Croydon
Now with Sunak as PM it looks like austerity round two is the policy of the day so I can't see the DfT paying for leasing these. Scrap is a realistic option at this point unless rising leasing costs (as they are increasing now) see the 379s as cheaper than ordering new.
I definitely think the possibility exists that ordering new EMUs will now be more expensive than the 379s. Interest rates on the rise means the loans to pay for any new trains will be higher than until a few months ago. BUT I do not think there will be any new orders for EMUs for the foreseeable future. Except perhaps for Scotrail, if this year.
 

Sutton in Ant

Member
Joined
2 Mar 2021
Messages
256
Location
Sutton Surrey
I still believe that the 379s will be leased out again in the future as I think that Akiem will lower there leasing costs and a rail franchise company will end up taking them.
 

RobShipway

Established Member
Joined
20 Sep 2009
Messages
3,337
I still believe that the 379s will be leased out again in the future as I think that Akiem will lower there leasing costs and a rail franchise company will end up taking them.
I think it is more likely that the class 379 fleet will be leased than new trains being ordered. I say this with being involved in the IT/Computer industry with the shortage of chips being manufactured from the likes of China. There is I believe delays in getting other parts needed to build trains, which if trains where ordered today would probably mean that the trains would not be delivered much before 2029.

So, it is not just the cost of leasing that you have to take into account. As I say above, there is the cost to the manufacturer are currently quite high.
 

Southern Dvr

Member
Joined
13 Oct 2010
Messages
991
I still believe that the 379s will be leased out again in the future as I think that Akiem will lower there leasing costs and a rail franchise company will end up taking them.
Nothing wrong with believing that, just prepare to be disappointed.
 

A0

On Moderation
Joined
19 Jan 2008
Messages
7,751
Plus we can't be sure of any transport ministers staying in post long enough to make decisions about the 379s for example.

I doubt "the ministers" will be making any decisions about a small EMU fleet. That will be devolved down to officials based on a "do what is best value for the taxpayer" basis.

That some people seriously think ministers will be sitting at their desks pondering which routes a fleet of 30 EMUs could be deployed to shows how little people know or understand about the job government ministers actually do.
 

Southern Dvr

Member
Joined
13 Oct 2010
Messages
991
They’ve been in store for almost a year I believe. There is no interest and they are deteriorating as any train does when it’s not in regular use.

We’ve already had 360 & 365 go for scrap after a period in store, and unless something happens with threes stored 379s by the end of the year the bin is the only place they’ll go.

Oh, and I think this is a shockingly sad stage of affairs.
 

A0

On Moderation
Joined
19 Jan 2008
Messages
7,751
They’ve been in store for almost a year I believe. There is no interest and they are deteriorating as any train does when it’s not in regular use.

We’ve already had 360 & 365 go for scrap after a period in store, and unless something happens with threes stored 379s by the end of the year the bin is the only place they’ll go.

Oh, and I think this is a shockingly sad stage of affairs.

Ignoring the fact the 365s were non-standard and the 360s in question were privately owned, there was only a small number of them and they were never being made available for re-leasing. Apart from that no difference at all.......
 

43102EMR

Established Member
Joined
28 Mar 2021
Messages
1,373
Location
UK
They’ve been in store for almost a year I believe. There is no interest and they are deteriorating as any train does when it’s not in regular use.

We’ve already had 360 & 365 go for scrap after a period in store, and unless something happens with threes stored 379s by the end of the year the bin is the only place they’ll go.

Oh, and I think this is a shockingly sad stage of affairs.
360/2s were rather limited with usage beyond Heathrow shuttles owing to equipment fitted, were privately owned and a small microfleet of 5, with only 2 having gone for scrap and the remaining 3 saved at the last second. 365s were an unfortunate case of newer EMUs being available and are non-standard compared to, say, an Electrostar or a Desiro and lacked the capability to be refitted for freight/parcel work, hence Eversholt cut their losses and sent them for scrap.

I’m not saying the 379s will not go for scrap, but there’s a strong possibility they won’t.
 

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
20,393
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
Ignoring the fact the 365s were non-standard and the 360s in question were privately owned, there was only a small number of them and they were never being made available for re-leasing. Apart from that no difference at all.......

There is a slight potential difference, namely that there are potential deployments for the 379s, not least GTR.

The problem with the 365s was the fleet had essentially got boxed in to a corner by being partially surplus on GTR, and then the remainder at short-notice due to Covid.

I suspect what is going on with the 379s is a game of brinkmanship, who blinks first. That’s not to say one party misjudges the other and they end up getting scrapped though.
 

Peter Sarf

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
9,659
Location
Croydon
I would say there is no need for any more EMUs for the time being. By the time there is a need for more the 379s will have been stored for too long. They might get used to swap out some other EMUs which will gather dust instead. The only real chance they have is if demand for train services picks up - at the moment I wonder if cuts are looming.
 

Southern Dvr

Member
Joined
13 Oct 2010
Messages
991
Ignoring the fact the 365s were non-standard and the 360s in question were privately owned, there was only a small number of them and they were never being made available for re-leasing. Apart from that no difference at all.......
The point still stands that units that are relatively new have been scrapped when it became clear there was no future work on the horizon. As for 360s being privately owned, aren’t the 379s privately owned as well?

Once upon a time the concept of relatively new stock going for scrap would be shocking, but now stock that’s 10 years old will go in the bin as standard practice because despite what it looks like the railways are desolate places with only 1 punter per carriage. (They’re not but this is the picture DfT wishes to paint)

Reality check people, 379s were pretty much ready to go and earn their keep wherever there was OHLE once GA had finished with them. Nobody has shown a serious interest. The reality is that they’re going to be deteriorating the longer they are out of use. They don’t get warm storage runs to keep them operational and this tells me that they’re just gonna rot away at Harwich and Norwich and then get scrapped. Decent rolling stock that could be very efficiently used elsewhere but DfT won’t allow the cost. They could have relatively easily replaced WMT Class 319s for example, they could have been deployed in Scotrail territory or as was mooted originally on Great Northern. Those were relatively simple out of the box options and they’ve not gone anywhere. So what’s left that doesn’t involve even more expenditure?
 

RobShipway

Established Member
Joined
20 Sep 2009
Messages
3,337
The point still stands that units that are relatively new have been scrapped when it became clear there was no future work on the horizon. As for 360s being privately owned, aren’t the 379s privately owned as well?

Once upon a time the concept of relatively new stock going for scrap would be shocking, but now stock that’s 10 years old will go in the bin as standard practice because despite what it looks like the railways are desolate places with only 1 punter per carriage. (They’re not but this is the picture DfT wishes to paint)

Reality check people, 379s were pretty much ready to go and earn their keep wherever there was OHLE once GA had finished with them. Nobody has shown a serious interest. The reality is that they’re going to be deteriorating the longer they are out of use. They don’t get warm storage runs to keep them operational and this tells me that they’re just gonna rot away at Harwich and Norwich and then get scrapped. Decent rolling stock that could be very efficiently used elsewhere but DfT won’t allow the cost. They could have relatively easily replaced WMT Class 319s for example, they could have been deployed in Scotrail territory or as was mooted originally on Great Northern. Those were relatively simple out of the box options and they’ve not gone anywhere. So what’s left that doesn’t involve even more expenditure?
I think what was meant that the Class 360/2 and class 332 fleets where owned by BAA plc (hheathrow Airport Holdings), rather than a leasing company, which is who owns the class 379 units.

When you think that the class 379 fleet came about from a government white paper in 2007 and how they are now as Southern Dvr states deteriorating away being stored the last 9 months having been withdrawn from service February this year, it would be a shame that the class 379 fleet gets scrapped possibly for parts for other Electrostar fleets still operating.

In an ideal world, the class 379 fleet should have gone to GTR Great Northern, to replace the class 387's which would then go south to Southern.

When you think that the class 379 fleet is 10 - 11 years old, it is a shame to see these being scrapped when Southern are still using trains that are more than 40 years old with very little signs that those trains will be replaced.
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
19,874
Location
East Anglia
Reality check people, 379s were pretty much ready to go and earn their keep wherever there was OHLE once GA had finished with them. Nobody has shown a serious interest. The reality is that they’re going to be deteriorating the longer they are out of use. They don’t get warm storage runs to keep them operational and this tells me that they’re just gonna rot away at Harwich and Norwich and then get scrapped.

Nothing wrong with the ones at Norwich. Regularly checked over & brought under the wires. In fact two had a a little holiday outing to Ilford the week before last.
 

A0

On Moderation
Joined
19 Jan 2008
Messages
7,751
They could have relatively easily replaced WMT Class 319s for example, they could have been deployed in Scotrail territory or as was mooted originally on Great Northern. Those were relatively simple out of the box options and they’ve not gone anywhere. So what’s left that doesn’t involve even more expenditure?

They couldn't have replaced the 319s on WMR without a load of driver training - more complex than the 319s which were similar to the 321s they replaced. Plus WMR doesn't have any maintenance facilities familiar with Electrostars. And WMR already had their fleet plans in place which removes the 319s and 350/2s.

Scotrail same thing - they'd have ended up as a non standard sub class north of the border.

And if they were wanted / needed on GN they'd have gone there already.
 

Peter Sarf

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
9,659
Location
Croydon
.......................

In an ideal world, the class 379 fleet should have gone to GTR Great Northern, to replace the class 387's which would then go south to Southern.

When you think that the class 379 fleet is 10 - 11 years old, it is a shame to see these being scrapped when Southern are still using trains that are more than 40 years old with very little signs that those trains will be replaced.
It does not look good that the cascade you refer to was not forthcoming. All those 313s, 455s, 465s & 466s will need replacing sooner rather than later unless a severe decline in service levels (frequency and/or length) is really so likely !.

But at least some of the 379s are being kept in "warm storage" as per report by @dk1.
 

RailWonderer

Established Member
Joined
25 Jul 2018
Messages
2,217
Location
All around the network
Reality check people, 379s were pretty much ready to go and earn their keep wherever there was OHLE once GA had finished with them. Nobody has shown a serious interest. The reality is that they’re going to be deteriorating the longer they are out of use. They don’t get warm storage runs to keep them operational and this tells me that they’re just gonna rot away at Harwich and Norwich and then get scrapped. Decent rolling stock that could be very efficiently used elsewhere but DfT won’t allow the cost. They could have relatively easily replaced WMT Class 319s for example, they could have been deployed in Scotrail territory or as was mooted originally on Great Northern. Those were relatively simple out of the box options and they’ve not gone anywhere. So what’s left that doesn’t involve even more expenditure?
GWR put out a tender that was worded to imply they wanted 379s although I'm not sure why. They have enough 387s for the half hourly Didcot semi fasts, the hourly Newbury fast and the odd longer distance service even after giving up 12 for the HeX operation.
 

Trainbike46

Established Member
Joined
18 Sep 2021
Messages
4,374
Location
belfast
GWR put out a tender that was worded to imply they wanted 379s although I'm not sure why. They have enough 387s for the half hourly Didcot semi fasts, the hourly Newbury fast and the odd longer distance service even after giving up 12 for the HeX operation.
The general opinion seems to be that they wanted to put some pressure on the 387 leasing company to reduce charges by making them compete with the akiem 379s
 

43102EMR

Established Member
Joined
28 Mar 2021
Messages
1,373
Location
UK
GWR put out a tender that was worded to imply they wanted 379s although I'm not sure why. They have enough 387s for the half hourly Didcot semi fasts, the hourly Newbury fast and the odd longer distance service even after giving up 12 for the HeX operation.
It was a market testing exercise which has since been dropped, given GWR has just put out a tender for maintenance on the 387s.

Personally, I can only see them going to Great Northern, should the DfT allow the move as was previously blocked.
 

Failed Unit

Established Member
Joined
26 Jan 2009
Messages
9,791
Location
Central Belt
It will be an interesting situation when you think about it as just a metal box.

These numbers are to demonstrate the point, they are not real.

Current owned can’t least them so they decide to sell them
Scrap dealer offers £10,000
I offer £12,000

They should really sell them to me to get best value for their shareholders.

However I have got a cunning plan to least them a £1000 per year.

Suddenly scrapping them seems the better options as I am going to undercut them on other fleets, so they may scrap them to avoid me getting them. However they may also think, actually it is better to get £1500 per year (rather than the £3000 we originally wanted) to a least get some money back from our asset.

I don’t think they will be scrapped. I suspect they will lease them at a more realistic rate in the end. Scrapping will get immediate cash, but they are likely to offer them out on tender which means that others could buy them with the view of leasing them out. Selling them for scrap only could cause issue with shareholders.

Whatever happens, is this the first time a modern unit has gone out of use so early in its life? Did anyone expect the 315s and 317s to outlive them?

I also have a sense of Dejavu. Traffic is down, let’s scrap the 379s. 2 years time traffic is back and 12 car units are needed, but nothing is left. Lets build some more EMUs.
 

py_megapixel

Established Member
Joined
5 Nov 2018
Messages
7,489
Location
Northern England
It will be an interesting situation when you think about it as just a metal box.

These numbers are to demonstrate the point, they are not real.

Current owned can’t least them so they decide to sell them
Scrap dealer offers £10,000
I offer £12,000

They should really sell them to me to get best value for their shareholders.

However I have got a cunning plan to least them a £1000 per year.

Suddenly scrapping them seems the better options as I am going to undercut them on other fleets, so they may scrap them to avoid me getting them. However they may also think, actually it is better to get £1500 per year (rather than the £3000 we originally wanted) to a least get some money back from our asset.

I don’t think they will be scrapped. I suspect they will lease them at a more realistic rate in the end. Scrapping will get immediate cash, but they are likely to offer them out on tender which means that others could buy them with the view of leasing them out. Selling them for scrap only could cause issue with shareholders.

Whatever happens, is this the first time a modern unit has gone out of use so early in its life? Did anyone expect the 315s and 317s to outlive them?

I also have a sense of Dejavu. Traffic is down, let’s scrap the 379s. 2 years time traffic is back and 12 car units are needed, but nothing is left. Lets build some more EMUs.
I hope (possibly in vain) that this might not be the case for the 379s, as their owners don't own any other UK passenger fleets so there's no real way for them to be undercut.
 

TT-ONR-NRN

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2016
Messages
12,867
Location
Cambridge
They’ve been in store for almost a year I believe. There is no interest and they are deteriorating as any train does when it’s not in regular use.

We’ve already had 360 & 365 go for scrap after a period in store, and unless something happens with threes stored 379s by the end of the year the bin is the only place they’ll go.
The 365 is not a suitable comparison. 1994 entry to service is far, far earlier than 2011.
 

Bikeman78

Established Member
Joined
26 Apr 2018
Messages
6,183
Parking them up next to the sea was not, in hindsight, the best idea if they wanted the units to see further use, although I suspect they were expecting the period out of service to be shorter when they were initially withdrawn.
They can be seen on Google satellite. I count 15 so some must have moved since the image was recorded. The prevailing wind will normally blow the salty air away from them. Do they move from time to time?
 

Failed Unit

Established Member
Joined
26 Jan 2009
Messages
9,791
Location
Central Belt
The 365 is not a suitable comparison. 1994 entry to service is far, far earlier than 2011.
I must admit - 26 years of service isn’t too shabby for the 365s. Granted they could have gone on for longer, but you can understand why they didn’t. You could understand the issues with the 379s if they were not really part of a common platform. It isn’t as if spare parts will be an issue.

The other shame is that the timing didn’t work out that EMR got the 360s rather than the 379s. Again if they had we would be having the exact same discussions about the 360s.

That is the trouble with fragmentation, back in BRs days people would have factored in the 150’s are not going to last forever and will cost x to replace. so we are going to need to spend this anyway, might as well spend this on wires and use existing trains.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top