158722
Member
- Joined
- 8 Nov 2009
- Messages
- 831
Another set of cascades that I really like the sound of.Oh if only such joined up thinking actually prevailed...
I probably wouldn't throw out quite so many displaced 142s mind, seeing how woefully short of units Northern are. As much as I hate the idea of Northern becoming even more of a kingdom where the dreaded 142 reigns supreme than it already is, I wouldn't start scrapping Pacers until the stage of the cascaded Transpennine 170/3s was reached, when I'd get rid of about 10 Pacers following the arrival of 9 158s from FSR, starting with the ones with surviving 3+2 bus seating (even though I get all nostalgic when I end up travelling on one of these units). If the remaining South Clyde branches were electrified and displaced FSR 156s went to Northern (the previously mentioned 12-15 units), I would then see fit to also scrap the 15 ex-ATW 142s (Or whichever 15 142s were most knackered).
I was assuming a no-growth situation, but of course, the 142s only get binned if there is spare capacity as you correctly say. As we know, some of the Northern routes are badly overcrowded, so the spare 142s could just be used sparingly at peak times.
A slow attrition in Pacer numbers from a variety of sources is what I was getting at, as opposed to any general new build. Do I recall some mention of NXEA cutting back Lowestoft services to Ipswich only? Perhaps 2 170s saved there, displacing 153s? Also, don't MerseyRail want to extend to Wrexham? Couple more 150s or whatever saved there. Reading-Basingstoke-Salisbury-Romsey-Southampton getting 3rd rail would also free up some quality 158/159 stock for use elsewhere.