YorkshireRider
Member
Where are those figures from.
that's over 500 million there, how much of that have they re-couped? I suspect your figures have been put together by a Man Utd fan!
http://www.transferleague.co.uk/
Where are those figures from.
that's over 500 million there, how much of that have they re-couped? I suspect your figures have been put together by a Man Utd fan!
how much of that have they re-couped? I suspect your figures have been put together by a Man Utd fan!
Sky Sports News has just confirmed this as true...what a sad day for genuine Rangers FansRangers to go into administration?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-17015966
Aberdeen were the last none-Old Firm winners, back the the 1990s ('92 I think).
It was longer than that Matt, 84/85 season I think Aberdeen won it. They were close in 92 though, last day 2 nil win for us at Ibrox against them won it if I remember.
Yep, we're finished no doubt, though Scottish football has been finished for years now.
Wasnt it when Sir Alex was at Aberdeen, he's been at united for 25 years or so!
The sale of Aiden McGeady last season gave the 'inflated' profit at CP last year, we're realistic in the fact that silly money was being offered for him and we could buy a few decent players and make a good profit out of any deal. The way of the 'modern world' in the SPL...come the summer James Forrest could be going 'south' as well for a similar fee I feel...I know there are many factors behind it, and it is nowhere near as severe as on the West side of Glasgow, but Celtic's profits are down significantly, from £7,000,000 to £180,000 in the last half of 2011:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-business-17009960
Aberdeen were the last none-Old Firm winners, back the the 1990s ('92 I think).
It was longer than that Matt, 84/85 season I think Aberdeen won it. They were close in 92 though, last day 2 nil win for us at Ibrox against them won it if I remember.
The Gers have gone into administration.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-17026172
*Makes joke about jelly and ice cream*
I guess the title race is over then.
But it's still misleading, if Man City had a fire sale they'd re-coup a huge amount of money from what they have spent.
Silva, Yaya, Aguero, Dzeko would bring millions and millions in if they were sold. Man Utd have still spent loads of money, they broke the transfer record about 5 times over the years.
It's easy to critisise Man City and Chelsea for their spending but ultimatley Man Utd have been just as bad. What's worse is Man Utd's milking of the Munich tradegy. No longer is it time to remember the dead it's now a time for the club to cash in both in sympathy terms and money. Remember those one off shirts they brought in for the City game a few years ago, they ended up flogging them in the club shop for £50 a time. They even had a sponsor on the "Munich 58" banner outside the stadium, it's just sick.
The police have made a statement concerning their worries about being paid for the policing costs for the coming match, plus the remaining matches in the season.
I think Gary Megson would do a good job at Arsenal. (Anything to get him and his hoof it up the field football away from Hillsborough... as it as we feared, not stood the test of time)
I guess I will get flamed for this, but isn't that an over-emotive argument that is akin to saying "RBS are too big to be allowed to go bust"? Either "the fans" are simply paying their money to be entertained, and, though part of this entertainment relies on the tribalism, they can join another tribe; or they are an essential part of the club - and must share the blame for what is happening at their club. At Rangers, I presume the fans were happy when a previous Chairman promised to spend double of whatever Celtic paid out; I presume they were happy to win trophies through spending other people's money rather than player development. And, before anyone asks what can a fan do - they can stop going to the games, just as they could withdraw funds from RBS before it went tits up, or they can stop shopping at Tesco if they disagree with its policies. I do not wish HMRC to continue to sponsor football clubs that are unwilling to operate in the real world..... for the sake of the fans .....
Ahh Yes, the 'classic' 'For every £5 Celtic spend , we'll spend £10 then', maybe they should of added 'even if it's not actually our Tenner to spend'I guess I will get flamed for this, but isn't that an over-emotive argument that is akin to saying "RBS are too big to be allowed to go bust"? Either "the fans" are simply paying their money to be entertained, and, though part of this entertainment relies on the tribalism, they can join another tribe; or they are an essential part of the club - and must share the blame for what is happening at their club. At Rangers, I presume the fans were happy when a previous Chairman promised to spend double of whatever Celtic paid out; I presume they were happy to win trophies through spending other people's money rather than player development. And, before anyone asks what can a fan do - they can stop going to the games, just as they could withdraw funds from RBS before it went tits up, or they can stop shopping at Tesco if they disagree with its policies. I do not wish HMRC to continue to sponsor football clubs that are unwilling to operate in the real world.
Anyone else notice how of a sudden Sky Sports News are now interested in the 'Europa League' now that United and City are in it? amazing...![]()
Fourth in the League.So the Arsenal bandwagon goes on:
1. Worst ever start to a league season.
2. Worst ever first division defeat.
3. Worst ever European defeat.