Minilad
Established Member
I believe Ice Hockey has limited video technology, for goals IIRC, and that is one of the fastest team sports going, so if they can use it there, why not in football?
Would it not be beyond the bounds of reality to have video technology when the ref isn't sure and play on as the ref sees fit. If the video comes back as the other way round, the clocks are reset and play goes back to that point, if not, it continues as it was. This would prevent much of the time wasting aspect. It would ofcourse rely on refs being honest about what they saw or didn't see.
As an example, a player's pass reaches the byline and another player claims to have kept it in, the opposition disagree, and the ref and assistants are not sure, the ref allows play to continue, but calls for video to decide. the home team go on to score a goal from it, but when the video comes back it shows the ball going out. The goal is ruled out, the elapsed time is added as injury time, or the clocks are put back, and play goes back to where the ball went off the pitch.
Ice Hockey is fast yes. But there are lots of stoppages where the clock is stopped. Not so in football. Video is only watched in Ice Hockey (while the game is in progress) for goals. Which in football I wouldn't have a problem with. And then its only to verify if the puck has crossed the line nothing else.
Under the method you suggest a game would go on for hours as everyone would challenge every decision that is borderline.
