VauxhallandI
Established Member
My gran used to serve the teas at Cathkin ParkI remember in the late 1950s asking a teacher from Scotland how Third Lanark football team got its name....and he told me.
My gran used to serve the teas at Cathkin ParkI remember in the late 1950s asking a teacher from Scotland how Third Lanark football team got its name....and he told me.
More of interest to both you and I, the draw has been made for the FA Cup Second Qualifying round with both our teams having home advantage.is the correct answer - i said it would. The whole thing is driven by media hype and nonsense
How do you work that out? If say, 10 out of 100 Northern clubs qualify and 20 out of 200 Southern clubs qualify, then the probability of qualifying is still the same for everyone.The FA Cup of course is heavily loaded against clubs in the north. Regionalisation of the draws for the early rounds mean it is easier for southern and midland clubs to make the first round proper as, in relative terms, there are larger numbers of lower league sides from those areas in the competition.
Regionalisation gives all of them a fair chance, but you need to remember that the midland clubs are actually northern. England is not square in shape (it's more triangular), and the theoretical dividing line is not half way up.The FA Cup of course is heavily loaded against clubs in the north. Regionalisation of the draws for the early rounds mean it is easier for southern and midland clubs to make the first round proper as, in relative terms, there are larger numbers of lower league sides from those areas in the competition.
That being the case, there are still what one regards as being "southern" clubs playing in "northern" leagues.Regionalisation gives all of them a fair chance, but you need to remember that the midland clubs are actually northern. England is not square in shape (it's more triangular), and the theoretical dividing line is not half way up.
That being the case, there are still what one regards as being "southern" clubs playing in "northern" leagues.
I think that a comparison of Best and Messi in terms of actual personal achievements may not agree with your summation above.From the BBC website:
Cristiano Ronaldo says he and Lionel Messi "changed the history of football" but their rivalry is now "gone".
Widely regarded as all-time greats, they often faced each other in Spain's La Liga with Real Madrid and Barcelona.
"We are respected all over the world, that's the most important thing," Ronaldo said.
He wants to think themselves lucky enough they didn’t play in the George Best era. He would have eclipsed the pair of them.
Maybe if Best had been Argentinian & not from Northern Island achievements may have been different. Unfortunately Best never got to play in World Cup Finals. However he did win with Manchester United.I think that a comparison of Best and Messi in terms of actual personal achievements may not agree with your summation above.
As Best represented a national team that didn't have a great pool of talent to draw from other than Best himself, it isn't entirely fair to use international trophies or medals as a benchmark for individual ability. One extremely talented individual can only carry a team so far, so it's entirely possible that the potential heir to the Messi/Ronaldo duopoly (a certain Mr. Haaland) may never get the chance to test himself on the biggest international stage... at least until Yorkshire declares independence allowing him to switch allegiance!I think that a comparison of Best and Messi in terms of actual personal achievements may not agree with your summation above.
In my posting, the achievements that I made reference to were not just "international trophies and medals" but more to the point of Messi's performance in the football leagues that he has played and the number of goals scored and goal assists which were credited to him.As Best represented a national team that didn't have a great pool of talent to draw from other than Best himself, it isn't entirely fair to use international trophies or medals as a benchmark for individual ability. One extremely talented individual can only carry a team so far, so it's entirely possible that the potential heir to the Messi/Ronaldo duopoly (a certain Mr. Haaland) may never get the chance to test himself on the biggest international stage... at least until Yorkshire declares independence allowing him to switch allegiance!![]()
On a side note, the term ‘goal assist’ is something I’d happily shove into the ‘Comedic “things you would ban”: minor things that irritate you’ thread.and goal assists which were credited to him.
Whilst Messi was regarded by many as the "GOAT" (Greatest Of All Time- another modern term that I'd be tempted to ban) prior to last year's World Cup triumph, there were just as many (if not more) who considered his lack of international success to be a demerit on his record in comparison to the likes of Pele, Maradona, and even Cristiano Ronaldo himself who won international honours with Portugal.In my posting, the achievements that I made reference to were not just "international trophies and medals" but more to the point of Messi's performance in the football leagues that he has played and the number of goals scored and goal assists which were credited to him.
Let's not forget Johan Cruyff please. He genuinely changed the way the game was played with Rinus Michels, and then went on to create the modern FC Barcelona.Good players yes, great players maybe. But to claim they "changed the history of football" is open to debate. If that is the case then Pele, Eusebio, Mathews, Maradonna and Best were also game changers.
Great minds think alike!Let's not forget Johan Cruyff please. He genuinely changed the way the game was played with Rinus Michels, and then went on to create the modern FC Barcelona.
And the Dutch national team of the 1970s was a thing of genuine beauty.
(I'd urge anyone interested to seek out a Dutch film simply called "Nummer 14" which shows his balletic visionary genius in all its glory. Wonderful.
Yes, we must have been composing our Johan Cruyff tributes at the same time!Great minds think alike!![]()
![]()
Agreed. As a teenager I paid my first visit to Wembley in 1977 to see the Dutch take England apart.Let's not forget Johan Cruyff please. He genuinely changed the way the game was played with Rinus Michels, and then went on to create the modern FC Barcelona.
And the Dutch national team of the 1970s was a thing of genuine beauty.
(I'd urge anyone interested to seek out a Dutch film simply called "Nummer 14" which shows his balletic visionary genius in all its glory. Wonderful.
He's before my time, but there were three players that my late dad would wax lyrical about more than any others. Those three were George Best, Johann Cruyff, and Frank Worthington. There may have been a little bit of bias creeping in with big Frank!Agreed. As a teenager I paid my first visit to Wembley in 1977 to see the Dutch take England apart.
"Who needs cars and cash, when you've got a big moustache? Oh bless my soul, Frank Worthington!"He's before my time, but there were three players that my late dad would wax lyrical about more than any others. Those three were George Best, Johann Cruyff, and Frank Worthington. There may have been a little bit of bias creeping in with big Frank!
Unfortunately there was no Match of the Day back then, so most of us will never know just how good Dixie Dean, Jackie Milburn, Stanley Matthews, Tom Finney, Nat Lofthouse, Duncan Edwards etc etc etc were. I know times change and the game has changed, but if my Dad was still alive he’d say these players were at least as good as any player today.Dixie Dean knew all routes to the goal of the opposition.

Add also: the initialism "EPL"On a side note, the term ‘goal assist’ is something I’d happily shove into the ‘Comedic “things you would ban”: minor things that irritate you’ thread.
That's not as bad as people who still call it the "Premiership"... though if it were up to me it'd still be called Division One (or the First Division).Add also: the initialism "EPL"
There are some who still call it that...That's not as bad as people who still call it the "Premiership"... though if it were up to me it'd still be called Division One (or the First Division).
Which they then have to clarify whether they mean the top flight; the second tier; or the one officially called "League One"!There are some who still call it that...
Particularly dumb when it's pundits referring to "the first division" or "division one" when it's their job to keep up to date with such basic facts as the competition name.Which they then have to clarify whether they mean the top flight; the second tier; or the one officially called "League One"!![]()
To be honest Leagues One and Two are the worst ones for this- it isn't just misleading, it's poor English.