• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Football

EM2

Established Member
Joined
16 Nov 2008
Messages
7,522
Location
The home of the concrete cow
I wish 'Arry all the best in finding a new post. I think he could certainly do worse than Swansea, that much is for certain.
Swansea are very interested in Michael Laudrup, and have a recent track record of young, exciting managers. Redknapp would not suit them at all. Nor do they have the kind of budget he likes to spend.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

SS4

Established Member
Joined
30 Jan 2011
Messages
8,589
Location
Birmingham
Harry could have done an O'Neill - that is throwing his toys out of the pram because the chairman won't bankroll him further without success (defined as champions league for spurs). Remember they were (about) 11 points ahead of Arsenal at one point.
Of course since Redknapp is more of a media darling than the chairman it'll be the chairman who receives the brunt of complaints.
 

Scotrail84

On Moderation
Joined
5 Jul 2010
Messages
2,977
Yes he was highly impressed with their form when Spurs struggled to tank them 5-0 at Tynecastle :roll:

His wage is probably higher than the whole Hearts 1st team put together !!

I was at that game in the spurs end, great game especially with me coming from the green and white side of the capital. ;)
 

Ivo

Established Member
Joined
8 Jan 2010
Messages
7,307
Location
Bath (or Southend)
Latest update was this last minute attempt was too late and the deal already tabled by the other party seems to have gone through.

Source: BBC

Charles Green is said to hope talks with Ally McCoist with a view to him remaining in his position of Manager for the foreseeable future. But more interestingly, in a move that clearly shows that Green does have at least seem interest in the club, he has reportedly offered to make Walter Smith - the club's former Manager and part of the consortium that tried to rival the successful bid at the last minute - Club Chairman.

However, sources around the club still hope that Green will sell to Smith, and the supporters' club have indicated that fans should boycott the club and not renew existing season tickets as a means of keeping the pressure on Green's ownership.
 

richw

Veteran Member
Joined
10 Jun 2010
Messages
11,528
Location
Liskeard
Surely this rangers fiasco is not legitimate, when liquidated doesn't a company's assets have to be sold to the highest bidder, to get the best return for creditors. from what I have read, the charles green consortium are getting them cut priced!
 

Oswyntail

Established Member
Joined
23 May 2009
Messages
4,183
Location
Yorkshire
Surely this rangers fiasco is not legitimate, when liquidated doesn't a company's assets have to be sold to the highest bidder, to get the best return for creditors. from what I have read, the charles green consortium are getting them cut priced!
There seems to be an interesting principle at question: are the players assets or employees? The new company claims the players are covered by TUPE, i.e. employees, so transfer without fuss, and the purchase price offered is for other assets. The players association are claiming they are not covered, and have become free agents, suggesting they are not employees but a special class of asset. If the "players are employees" argument wins, this could prompt a re-evaluation of the value of clubs, especially those like Manchester United where a large proportion of their assets, and hence ability to borrow, is based on supposed player values.
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
32,907
Location
Fenny Stratford
The players are employees and thus are TUPED over to the NEWCO, the registration documents for the players are the assets. That is a very interesting and complex question. Very interesting.

Darlo are in a similar position. We TUPED the two contracted players over to the NEWCO (to hold onto their registration) and released the rest as their contracts had expired. The two contracted players will end up playing elsewhere but we should be compensated for their registration.
 

RyanB

Member
Joined
20 May 2011
Messages
142
Location
Edinburgh, UK
Surely this rangers fiasco is not legitimate, when liquidated doesn't a company's assets have to be sold to the highest bidder, to get the best return for creditors. from what I have read, the charles green consortium are getting them cut priced!

The entire thing has been a bloody shambles from start to finish. I can't make sense of the whole thing. Fixtures come out Monday, will there be one set of fixtures with Rangers in it? Or will there be a second set with Dundee (not Dundee United) in it?

As things stand neither the old company nor the new company have any right to play in Scottish football, the New Club have the stadium and training ground but no players, the Old Club has the players but no stadium to play in.

The SPL has suspended their investigation into the EBTs and dual contracts situation until the whole situation is resolved. The SFA appeals tribunal has yet to be re-convened after Rangers went to the Court of Session and had the case sent back to the tribunal, FIFA and UEFA aren't happy with Rangers going to the law courts rather than the Court of Arbitration for Sport.

The entire thing is a mess, so many different things going on.
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
32,907
Location
Fenny Stratford
Surely this rangers fiasco is not legitimate, when liquidated doesn't a company's assets have to be sold to the highest bidder, to get the best return for creditors. from what I have read, the charles green consortium are getting them cut priced!

it is perfectly legitimate. The assets will be bought out by the NEWCO and the remains liquidated. Whatever is left will go to the creditors. This happens all the time with company insolvency.

Taking Darlington as an example the NEWCO bought the following:

1) Name
2) Crest
3) Colours
4) 2 players registrations
5) Goodwill (essentially the History)
6) Some stock and footballing equipment

Whether this meets SFA rules is a different matter. It meets the requirements of Insolvency Law.
 

richw

Veteran Member
Joined
10 Jun 2010
Messages
11,528
Location
Liskeard
The players are employees and thus are TUPED over to the NEWCO, the registration documents for the players are the assets. That is a very interesting and complex question. Very interesting.

Darlo are in a similar position. We TUPED the two contracted players over to the NEWCO (to hold onto their registration) and released the rest as their contracts had expired. The two contracted players will end up playing elsewhere but we should be compensated for their registration.

However under tupe, employees can decline a transfer of employment, or resign without notice within a certain period at the start of transfer
 

richw

Veteran Member
Joined
10 Jun 2010
Messages
11,528
Location
Liskeard
it is perfectly legitimate. The assets will be bought out by the NEWCO and the remains liquidated. Whatever is left will go to the creditors. This happens all the time with company insolvency.

Taking Darlington as an example the NEWCO bought the following:

1) Name
2) Crest
3) Colours
4) 2 players registrations
5) Goodwill (essentially the History)
6) Some stock and footballing equipment

Whether this meets SFA rules is a different matter. It meets the requirements of Insolvency Law.

I was under the impression the assets have to be sold to the highest bidder either as a Job lot, or as individual items.
 

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
35,406
Location
A typical commuter-belt part of north-west England
Ross County, with their coming first season in the SPL approaching, have signed 22 year old Gary Glen, who scored seven goals for Hearts last season, on a one-year contract. It reflects well on the Highland League that two of their former clubs have now managed to achieve the distinction of reaching this level in Scottish football.

On the downside, I cannot see either Fort William or Strathspey Thistle ever making this type of upward movement..:roll:
 

Ivo

Established Member
Joined
8 Jan 2010
Messages
7,307
Location
Bath (or Southend)
The over-rated Nicklas Bendtner has been given a €100,000 fine and a one match suspension (applicable at international level) after his celebration against Portugal. For anyone who didn't notice what he was up to at the time, click here for the BBC article.
 

MidnightFlyer

Veteran Member
Joined
16 May 2010
Messages
12,856
The over-rated Nicklas Bendtner has been given a €100,000 fine and a one match suspension (applicable at international level) after his celebration against Portugal. For anyone who didn't notice what he was up to at the time, click here for the BBC article.

It's a sad day when a player revealing sponsored underwear gets fined more than Spain and Serbia have in the past for racist chanting... :roll:
 

CC 72100

Established Member
Joined
23 Jan 2012
Messages
3,850
The over-rated Nicklas Bendtner has been given a €100,000 fine and a one match suspension (applicable at international level) after his celebration against Portugal. For anyone who didn't notice what he was up to at the time, click here for the BBC article.

Over the top reaction completely by UEFA. Once again, they need to sort their priorities out better. Whilst this is against the rules, and he should be punished, racist fan behaviour still seems to be given just a tap on the back with a 'Now be a good boy and don't do that again' mentality. :(

I also hear UEFA are opening proceedings with the FA over some England fan behaviour - anyone got more knowledge over what this is about?
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
It's a sad day when a player revealing sponsored underwear gets fined more than Spain and Serbia have in the past for racist chanting... :roll:

Didn't spot that first time round, but what I was hinting at in my post, very true.
 

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
35,406
Location
A typical commuter-belt part of north-west England
It's a sad day when a player revealing sponsored underwear gets fined more than Spain and Serbia have in the past for racist chanting... :roll:

Perhaps they may see this fine as a deterrent against the money paid to an individual player for his misdemeanour in accepting money for a strange form of advertising of a commercial company.

However, with regard to the matter of both Spain and Serbia, there should have been a total ban on both of these two teams from playing International Football for a period of years. Whether this would even then stop the mental mindset of the fans who indulge in such disgraceful behaviour is debatable, but at least it would not be happening on the world football stage.
 

ReverendFozz

Member
Joined
26 Feb 2011
Messages
484
Location
Murton, Co. Durham
The over-rated Nicklas Bendtner has been given a €100,000 fine and a one match suspension (applicable at international level) after his celebration against Portugal. For anyone who didn't notice what he was up to at the time, click here for the BBC article.

Talking about excessive and ludicrous fines, does anybody remember Robbie Savage once getting a hefty fine for having a crap in a referees toilet

Sent from my GT-S5830 using Tapatalk 2
 

Butts

Veteran Member
Joined
16 Jan 2011
Messages
11,821
Location
Stirlingshire
Talking about excessive and ludicrous fines, does anybody remember Robbie Savage once getting a hefty fine for having a crap in a referees toilet

Sent from my GT-S5830 using Tapatalk 2

Yes if only he'd remembered to flush it afterwards he would have been ok :oops:
 
Last edited:

Top