SS4
Established Member
The question is would you be willing to pay Sky for a poor standard of football with paltry crowds
Keeping rangers in the league will show that if you've got enough power you can bend the rules. How is that good for Scotland?
The question is would you be willing to pay Sky for a poor standard of football with paltry crowds
Chelseas images released for the proposal at Battersea power station.
Daily mail with lazy picture editor
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...a-images-Battersea-Power-Station-stadium.html
I've read somewhere today that Kilmarnock reckon they'll need to shift an extra thousand season tickets next season to cover the loss they make from not playing the Gers at home twice.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Don't forget Chelsea FC are also willing to fund the majority of the Northern line Battersea extension if they do indeed win the right to use the Power Station.
Sorry if this point has already been made, but can anyone cite another case in British football of a football team accused of misdemeanors to be allowed a vote in a similar situation, where all the other teams alone should be the only ones allowed.
Is this something peculiar to Scottish Law ? It is like the accused in a Court of Law having his/her representative amongst the jurors.
How long has this situation existed within the rules of Scottish football ?
Just a thought...
If Rangers had to start again from SD3, would they be the most likely winners in the history of League football worldwide? Surely they would be more likely to win 108 points (i.e. the maximum) than not win it...
Green has said that story is rubbish and the Bury chairman said they wouldn't sell anyway.
If an approach to Bury FC had actually been made, under the present financial strictures that currently govern Glasgow Rangers FC, would any "football offence" have been committed under the rules of either the English FA or the Scottish FA ?
The champions league place would last about a year before UEFA told the SFA that your clubs are not good enough to warrant two places in champions league, then you would be back to square one.
How do you think Motherwell be go on in the Champions league? knocked out well before group stages by some team from Hungary!!
If you get rid of Rangers in two or three years time your champions league place will be replaced with a place in Europa league, it happened to the italians there teams never did anything in champions league and they lost a place.
The better your team does in european competitions the more places you have, look at England they have 4 teams in the champions league thats because there teams do well in the competition year in year out.
Only Rangers and Celtic have kept Scottish football with two places in the champions league, and the fact that they qualified for the group stages.
If you let Rangers go and replace them with Motherwell and other second rated clubs who never get to group stages then your place will go
Sky is holding the SPL to ransom - you can dress it up however you like. Has nobody considered they might be better off without sky and domestic competition can increase between the SPL and Scottish Division 1
The question is would you be willing to pay Sky for a poor standard of football with paltry crowds
Keeping rangers in the league will show that if you've got enough power you can bend the rules. How is that good for Scotland?
Sorry if this point has already been made, but can anyone cite another case in British football of a football team accused of misdemeanors to be allowed a vote in a similar situation, where all the other teams alone should be the only ones allowed.
Is this something peculiar to Scottish Law ? It is like the accused in a Court of Law having his/her representative amongst the jurors.
How long has this situation existed within the rules of Scottish football ?
No because it will be Charles Green buying Bury not Rangers, with his personal wealth.
Regulations state can not own two clubs Fa affiliated, but one would be Fa and the other SFA. This affected the original Plymouth Argyle take over as Kevin Heaney already owned Truro City.
Charles green has no connection with the rangers in financial turmoil, he has simply purchased All the assets of the liquidated company.
Yes, I realise what you say, but as holder of these assets, he therefore has the stated connection with Glasgow Rangers FC.
Nope not at all, his only connection is that he has bought the assets from the old co, in such a manner as a customer. It is no different to the connection I have from the estate agent I bought my house off, or the car dealer i bought my car from.
He is however connected to the new co, which have no debts or financial irregularatories
We eventually reach the nub of the matter. If matters are as you so describe above, with his connection to a "blameless" new company, why did the matter of an approach to Bury FC ever need to have been made at all ?
Not a lot of 'love' for the AFKA 'Rangers FC' is there??? Shame, but I bet they still 'worm' their way back into the SPL...pi** poor if they do...lets hope not (based on the 'Livingston' situation)
Any news as to how Ross County might cast their vote, as this could be one of the crucial team votes.
im a proud blackpool supporter and held a season ticket last year while in the prem shame charlie adam had to go to liverpool great player now traiter
im a proud blackpool supporter and held a season ticket last year while in the prem shame charlie adam had to go to liverpool great player now traiter